Factors associated with inappropriate use of emergency departments: findings from a cross-sectional national study in France

被引:45
|
作者
Naouri, Diane [1 ,2 ]
Ranchon, Guillaume [3 ]
Vuagnat, Albert [4 ]
Schmidt, Jeannot [5 ,6 ]
El Khoury, Carlos [3 ,7 ]
Yordanov, Youri [1 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Sorbonne Univ, Hop St Antoine, AP HP, Serv Accueil Urgences, Paris, France
[2] Univ Paris Sud, Univ Paris Saclay, UVSQ, French Natl Inst Hlth & Med Res INSERM U1018,Ctr, Villejuif, France
[3] Medipole, Emergency Dept, Villeurbanne, France
[4] Univ Hosp, Biostat & Bioinformat DIM, Dijon, France
[5] Clermont Ferrand Univ Hosp, Emergency Dept, Clermont Ferrand, France
[6] Univ Clermont Auvergne, EA 4679, Clermont Ferrand, France
[7] RESCUe RESUVal, INSERM, HESPER EA 7425, Lyon, France
[8] Sorbonne Univ, INSERM, Inst Pierre Louis Epidemiol & Sante Publ, UMR S 1136, Paris, France
关键词
emergency department; primary care; healthcare quality improvement; health services research; NON-URGENT UTILIZATION; PRIMARY-CARE; NONURGENT EMERGENCY; HEALTH; VISITS; INEQUALITIES; CONTINUITY; SERVICES; INSURANCE; ACCIDENT;
D O I
10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009396
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Inappropriate visits to emergency departments (EDs) could represent from 20% to 40% of all visits. Inappropriate use is a burden on healthcare costs and increases the risk of ED overcrowding. The aim of this study was to explore socioeconomic and geographical determinants of inappropriate ED use in France. Method The French Emergency Survey was a nationwide cross-sectional survey conducted on June 11 2013, simultaneously in all EDs in France and covered characteristics of patients, EDs and counties. The survey included 48 711 patient questionnaires and 734 ED questionnaires. We focused on adult patients (>= 15 years old). The appropriateness of the ED visit was assessed by three measures: caring physician appreciation of appropriateness (numeric scale), caring physician appreciation of whether or not the patient could have been managed by a general practitioner and ED resource utilisation. Descriptive statistics and multilevel logistic regression were used to examine determinants of inappropriate ED use, estimating adjusted ORs and 95% CIs. Results Among the 29 407 patients in our sample, depending on the measuring method, 13.5% to 27.4% ED visits were considered inappropriate. Regardless of the measure method used, likelihood of inappropriate use decreased with older age and distance from home to the ED >10 km. Not having a private supplementary health insurance, having universal supplementary health coverage and symptoms being several days old increased the likelihood of inappropriate use. Likelihood of inappropriate use was not associated with county medical density. Conclusion Inappropriate ED use appeared associated with socioeconomic vulnerability (such as not having supplementary health coverage or having universal coverage) but not with geographical characteristics. It makes us question the appropriateness of the concept of inappropriate ED use as it does not consider the distress experienced by the patient, and segments of society seem to have few other choices to access healthcare than the ED.
引用
收藏
页码:449 / 464
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Prevalence and factors associated with inappropriate use of treadmill exercise stress test for coronary artery disease: a cross-sectional study
    Antônio M. L. Silva
    Anderson C. Armstrong
    Fernando J. C. Silveira
    Marcelo D. Cavalcanti
    Fernando M. F. França
    Luis C. L. Correia
    BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, 15
  • [22] Inappropriate Use of Emergency Services from the Perspective of Primary Care Underutilization in a Local Romanian Context: A Cross-Sectional Study
    Lacatus, Anca Maria
    Atudorei, Ioana Anisa
    Neculau, Andrea Elena
    Isop, Laura Mihaela
    Vecerdi, Cristina Agnes
    Rogozea, Liliana
    Vacaru, Mihai
    HEALTHCARE, 2024, 12 (07)
  • [23] Prevalence and factors associated with inappropriate use of treadmill exercise stress test for coronary artery disease: a cross-sectional study
    Silva, Antonio M. L.
    Armstrong, Anderson C.
    Silveira, Fernando J. C.
    Cavalcanti, Marcelo D.
    Franca, Fernando M. F.
    Correia, Luis C. L.
    BMC CARDIOVASCULAR DISORDERS, 2015, 15
  • [24] The evaluation of the factors associated with asthma in Korean adolescents-findings from a national cross-sectional survey in 2007
    Jung, J.
    Yun, H.
    Choi, E.
    Ahn, H.
    Kim, J.
    ALLERGY, 2012, 67 : 307 - 307
  • [25] End-of-life care in emergency departments: A national cross-sectional survey of emergency care nurses
    Aquino, Jose
    Crilly, Julia
    Ranse, Kristen
    AUSTRALASIAN EMERGENCY CARE, 2022, 25 (02) : 161 - 166
  • [26] FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH INAPPROPRIATE HOSPITALIZATION IN MEDICAL WARDS - A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY IN 2 UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS
    PALDI, Y
    PORATH, A
    FRIEDMAN, L
    MOZES, B
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 1995, 7 (03) : 261 - 265
  • [27] ORGANIZATIONAL JUSTICE IS ASSOCIATED WITH TINNITUS FINDINGS FROM A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY
    Herr, R. M.
    Loerbroks, A.
    Bosch, J. A.
    Seegel, M.
    Schneider, M.
    Schmidt, B.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2014, 21 : S136 - S136
  • [28] Patients Opinion on the use of Generics and Factors Associated with it: A Cross-sectional Study
    Charan, Jaykaran
    Chaudhari, Mayur
    Saxena, Deepak
    Bhardwaj, Pankaj
    Dwivedi, Pradeep
    Ambwani, Sneha
    JOURNAL OF YOUNG PHARMACISTS, 2019, 11 (02) : 172 - 176
  • [29] FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH THE USE OF WARFARIN AND THE RISK OF BLEEDING: CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY
    ALAmmari, Maha
    Alturaiki, Abdulrahman
    Althemery, Abdullah Uthman
    Alfaifi, Abdullah Ali
    INDO AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, 2019, 6 (04): : 7284 - 7291
  • [30] Factors Associated With PIM use in the Frail Elderly: A Cross-sectional Study
    Tranhago, Camilla da P.
    Colatto, Luana L.
    Fernandes, Brigida D.
    Teixeira, Alexandra S. do C.
    Baldoni, Andre de O.
    Ayres, Lorena R.
    do Bem, Daniela A. M. G.
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACY PRACTICE, 2024, 37 (02) : 374 - 382