Managing Uncertainty in Geological Engineering Models for Open-Pit Feasibility

被引:0
|
作者
Munro, Rosalind [1 ]
Keaton, Jeffrey R. [1 ]
机构
[1] AMEC Amer Inc, Los Angeles, CA 90040 USA
关键词
Confidence interval; Precision index; Reliability; Practical strength value;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-319-09060-3_63
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Open-pit mines rely on geology for economic feasibility based on mineral value and geotechnical parameters. Pit slope angles may control economics; therefore, open-pit mine design utilizes a reliability approach that specifies confidence interval, precision index, and practical strength values. The geological model for economic evaluation is developed before pit slope stability analyses are undertaken and is based on lithology and mineralization, both of which are essential for the geological engineering model. The preliminary mine plan includes a shell for the ultimate pit based on assumed pit slope configuration that includes haul-road benches. Geological engineering characterization utilizes the geological model to identify locations for geotechnical bore holes and detailed mapping of rock structure to document aspects critical for slope stability. Uncertainty is common; rock structure variability is represented from direct observation of selected outcrops and from detailed logging of rock core. Lithologies that form the ultimate pit walls are sampled for unconfined compression testing. Samples of a single lithology from different bore holes reflect formation variability. Typically, a few (3-15) samples of each lithology are tested. The desired precision index and reliability may not be met for a specified confidence interval with a limited program; these parameters cannot be determined until test-result variability is known. Geological uncertainty may be managed for open-pit mines by using practical strength values, drilling a few additional bore holes, and performing additional unconfined compression tests.
引用
收藏
页码:367 / 370
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Adaptive open-pit mining planning under geological uncertainty
    Armstrong, Margaret
    Lagos, Tomas
    Emery, Xavier
    Homem-de-Mello, Tito
    Lagos, Guido
    Saure, Denis
    RESOURCES POLICY, 2021, 72
  • [2] A framework for adaptive open-pit mining planning under geological uncertainty
    Lagos, Tomas
    Armstrong, Margaret
    Homem-de-Mello, Tito
    Lagos, Guido
    Saure, Denis
    OPTIMIZATION AND ENGINEERING, 2022, 23 (01) : 111 - 146
  • [3] A framework for adaptive open-pit mining planning under geological uncertainty
    Tomás Lagos
    Margaret Armstrong
    Tito Homem-de-Mello
    Guido Lagos
    Denis Sauré
    Optimization and Engineering, 2022, 23 : 111 - 146
  • [4] Engineering geological environmental analysis of the mining area in open-pit mines
    Li, Huafeng
    Cai, Meifeng
    Jinshu Kuangshan/Metal Mine, 2000, (04): : 56 - 57
  • [5] Globally optimising open-pit and underground mining operations under geological uncertainty
    Montiel, L.
    Dimitrakopoulos, R.
    Kawahata, K.
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE INSTITUTIONS OF MINING AND METALLURGY SECTION A-MINING TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 125 (01): : 2 - 14
  • [6] Stochastic Final Pit Limits: An Efficient Frontier Analysis under Geological Uncertainty in the Open-Pit Mining Industry
    Jelvez, Enrique
    Morales, Nelson
    Ortiz, Julian M.
    MATHEMATICS, 2022, 10 (01)
  • [7] Incorporation of Geometallurgical Attributes and Geological Uncertainty into Long-Term Open-Pit Mine Planning
    Morales, Nelson
    Seguel, Sebastian
    Caceres, Alejandro
    Jelvez, Enrique
    Alarcon, Maximiliano
    MINERALS, 2019, 9 (02):
  • [8] A dynamic stochastic programming approach for open-pit mine planning with geological and commodity price uncertainty
    Rimele, Adrien
    Dimitrakopoulos, Roussos
    Gamache, Michel
    RESOURCES POLICY, 2020, 65
  • [9] FLEXIBLE OPEN-PIT MINE DESIGN UNDER UNCERTAINTY
    Groeneveld, B.
    Topal, E.
    JOURNAL OF MINING SCIENCE, 2011, 47 (02) : 212 - 226
  • [10] Flexible open-pit mine design under uncertainty
    Groeneveld B.
    Topal E.
    Journal of Mining Science, 2011, 47 (2) : 212 - 226