Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Permeable Reactive Barriers: Effects of Construction Methods, Reactive Materials and Groundwater Constituents

被引:22
|
作者
Mak, Mark S. H. [1 ]
Lo, Irene M. C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Hong Kong Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
ZERO-VALENT IRON; CONTAMINATED SITE; CHROMIUM REMOVAL; HUMIC-ACID; REMEDIATION; KINETICS; IMPACTS; WATER; FIELD;
D O I
10.1021/es202016d
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The effects of the construction methods, materials of reactive media and groundwater constituents on the environmental impacts of a permeable reactive barrier (PRB) were evaluated using life cycle assessment (LCA). The PRB is assumed to be installed at a simulated site contaminated by either Cr(VI) alone or Cr(VI) and As(V). Results show that the trench-based construction method can reduce the environmental impacts of the remediation remarkably compared to the caisson based method due to less construction material consumption by the funnel. Compared to using the zerovalent iron (Fe-0) and quartz sand mixture, the use of the Fe-0 and iron oxide coated sand (IOCS) mixture can reduce the environmental impacts. In the presence of natural organic matter (NOM) in groundwater, the environmental impacts generated by the reactive media were significantly increased because of the higher usage of Fe-0. The environmental impacts are lower by using the Fe-0 and IOCS mixture in the groundwater with NOM, compared with using the Fe-0 and quartz sand mixture. Since IOCS can enhance the removal efficiency of Cr(VI) and As(V), the usage of the Fe-0 can be reduced, which in turn reduces the impacts induced by the reactive media.
引用
收藏
页码:10148 / 10154
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Constructal design of permeable reactive barriers: groundwater-hydraulics criteria
    Kacimov, Anvar R.
    Klammler, Harald
    Il'yinskii, Nikolay
    Hatfield, Kirk
    JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MATHEMATICS, 2011, 71 (04) : 319 - 338
  • [22] Behavior of multi-layer permeable reactive barriers for groundwater remediation
    Bilardi, Stefania
    Simonetti, Silvia
    Calabro, Paolo Salvatore
    Moraci, Nicola
    SOILS AND FOUNDATIONS, 2023, 63 (06)
  • [23] Constructal design of permeable reactive barriers: groundwater-hydraulics criteria
    Anvar R. Kacimov
    Harald Klammler
    Nikolay Il’yinskii
    Kirk Hatfield
    Journal of Engineering Mathematics, 2011, 71 : 319 - 338
  • [24] The removal of arsenic from groundwater using permeable reactive materials
    Bain, J
    Spink, L
    Blowes, D
    Smyth, D
    TAILINGS AND MINE WASTE '02, 2002, : 213 - 216
  • [25] Nanocomposite permeable reactive barriers: "Green" nanotech for environmental remediation
    Harrup, Mason K.
    Polson, Linda A.
    White, Byron
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2006, 231
  • [26] Understanding pH effects on trichloroethylene and perchloroethylene adsorption to iron in permeable reactive barriers for groundwater remediation
    J. Luo
    J. Farrell
    International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 2013, 10 : 77 - 84
  • [27] Understanding pH effects on trichloroethylene and perchloroethylene adsorption to iron in permeable reactive barriers for groundwater remediation
    Luo, J.
    Farrell, J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 10 (01) : 77 - 84
  • [28] Permeable reactive barriers: A sustainable technology for cleaning contaminated groundwater in developing countries
    Phillips, D. H.
    DESALINATION, 2009, 248 (1-3) : 352 - 359
  • [29] Three-Dimensional Groundwater Flow Simulation for the Design of Permeable Reactive Barriers
    Chung, Young Wook
    Kim, Juyoul
    Kong, Sung-Ho
    Environmental Science and Technology, Pt 1, 2011, 6 : VI207 - VI210
  • [30] In situ treatment of metals-contaminated groundwater using permeable reactive barriers
    Smyth, DJA
    Blowes, DW
    Benner, SG
    Ptacek, CJ
    BIOREMEDIATION OF INORGANIC COMPOUNDS, 2001, 6 (09): : 71 - 78