Signal analysis of auditory evoked cortical fields in fetal magnetoencephalography

被引:50
|
作者
Schneider, U
Schleussner, E
Haueisen, J
Nowak, H
Seewald, HJ
机构
[1] Univ Hosp, Dept Obstet, D-07740 Jena, Germany
[2] Univ Jena, Dept Neurol, Biomagnet Ctr, D-6900 Jena, Germany
关键词
fetal magnetoencephalography; fetal magnetocardiography; auditory evoked cortical fields; functional brain maturation; signal-to-noise ratio; signal analysis;
D O I
10.1023/A:1012519923583
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Magnetoencephalography (MEG) using auditory evoked cortical fields (AEF) is an absolutely non-invasive method of passive measurement which utilizes magnetic fields caused by specific cortical activity. By applying the exceptionally sensitive SQUID technology to record these fields of dipolar configuration produced by the fetal brain, MEG as an investigational tool could provide new insights into the development of the human brain in utero. The major constraint to this application is a very low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) that has to be attributed to a variety of factors including the magnetic signals generated by the fetal and maternal hearts which inevitably obscure a straightforward signal analysis. By applying a new algorithm of specific heart artefact reduction based on the relative regularity of the heart signals, we were able to increase the chance of extracting a fetal AEF from the raw data by the means of averaging techniques and principle component analysis. Results from 27 pregnant, healthy women (third trimester of their uncomplicated pregnancy) indicate an improved detection rate and the reproducibility of the fetal MEG. We evaluate and discuss a-priori criteria for signal analyses which will enable us to systematically analyze additional limiting factors, to further enhance the efficiency of this method and to promote the assessment of its possible clinical value in the future.
引用
收藏
页码:69 / 80
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Signal type and signal-to-noise ratio interact to affect cortical auditory evoked potentials
    Billings, Curtis J.
    Grush, Leslie D.
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2016, 140 (02): : EL221 - EL226
  • [22] Cortical-Hippocampal Auditory Processing Identified by Magnetoencephalography
    Nishitani, N.
    Nagamine, T.
    Fujiwara, N.
    Yazawa, S.
    Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10 (02):
  • [23] Cortical-hippocampal auditory processing identified by magnetoencephalography
    Nishitani, N
    Nagamine, T
    Fujiwara, N
    Yazawa, S
    Shibasaki, H
    JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 1998, 10 (02) : 231 - 247
  • [24] Auditory cortical responses evoked by pure tones in healthy and sensorineural hearing loss subjects: functional MRI and magnetoencephalography
    Zhang Yun-ting
    Geng Zuo-jun
    Zhang Quan
    Li Wei
    Zhang Jing
    CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2006, 119 (18) : 1548 - 1554
  • [25] Analysis of auditory magnetic fields evoked by speech sounds
    Hayashi, M
    BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH-TOKYO, 1997, 18 : 91 - 100
  • [26] A neuromagnetic analysis of the mechanism for generating auditory evoked fields
    Hamada, T
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2005, 56 (02) : 93 - 104
  • [27] Analysis of the Effect of Musical Stimulation on Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials
    Baptista de Lima, Daiane Damaris
    Regacone, Simone Fiuza
    Silva de Oliveira, Anna Caroline
    Alcantara, Yara Bagali
    Baisi Chagas, Eduardo Federighi
    Figueiredo Frizzo, Ana Claudia
    INTERNATIONAL ARCHIVES OF OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2019, 23 (01) : 31 - 35
  • [28] VARIABILITY OF CORTICAL AUDITORY EVOKED RESPONSE
    HORVATH, RS
    JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1969, 32 (06) : 1056 - &
  • [29] EFFECTS OF SIGNAL RISE TIME AND DURATION ON EARLY COMPONENTS OF AUDITORY EVOKED CORTICAL RESPONSE
    SKINNER, PH
    ANTINORO, F
    JOURNAL OF SPEECH AND HEARING RESEARCH, 1971, 14 (03): : 552 - &
  • [30] Analysis and modeling of the mechanism for generating auditory-evoked fields
    Hamada, T
    UNVEILING THE MYSTERY OF THE BRAIN: NEUROPHYSIOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION OF THE BRAIN FUNCTION, 2005, 1278 : 207 - 210