Restoration of genetic connectivity among Northern Rockies wolf populations

被引:3
|
作者
Hebblewhite, Mark [1 ]
Musiani, Marco [2 ]
Mills, L. Scott [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Montana, Coll Forestry & Conservat, Wildlife Biol Program, Missoula, MT 59812 USA
[2] Univ Calgary, Fac Environm Design, Calgary, AB T2N 1N2, Canada
[3] Univ Montana, Wildlife Biol Program, Coll Forestry & Conservat, Missoula, MT 59812 USA
关键词
conservation genetics; dispersal; Endangered Species Act; gene flow; Northwestern United States; wolf re-introduction; MOUNTAINS; WOLVES; RESCUE;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04770.x
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Probably no conservation genetics issue is currently more controversial than the question of whether grey wolves (Canis lupus) in the Northern Rockies have recovered to genetically effective levels. Following the dispersal-based recolonization of Northwestern Montana from Canada, and reintroductions to Yellowstone and Central Idaho, wolves have vastly exceeded population recovery goals of 300 wolves distributed in at least 10 breeding pairs in each of Wyoming, Idaho and Montana. With > 1700 wolves currently, efforts to delist wolves from endangered status have become mired in legal battles over the distinct population segment (DPS) clause of the Endangered Species Act (ESA), and whether subpopulations within the DPS were genetically isolated. An earlier study by vonHoldt et al. (2008) suggested Yellowstone National Park wolves were indeed isolated and was used against delisting in 2008. Since then, wolves were temporarily delisted, and a first controversial hunting season occurred in fall of 2009. Yet, concerns over the genetic recovery of wolves in the Northern Rockies remain, and upcoming District court rulings in the summer of 2010 will probably include consideration of gene flow between subpopulations. In this issue of Molecular Ecology, vonHoldt et al. (2010) conduct the largest analysis of gene flow and population structure of the Northern Rockies wolves to date. Using an impressive sampling design and novel analytic methods, vonHoldt et al. (2010) show substantial levels of gene flow between three identified subpopulations of wolves within the Northern Rockies, clarifying previous analyses and convincingly showing genetic recovery.
引用
收藏
页码:4383 / 4385
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Genetic analysis of landscape connectivity in tree populations
    Sork, Victoria L.
    Smouse, Peter E.
    LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2006, 21 (06) : 821 - 836
  • [22] Modeling genetic connectivity in sticklebacks as a guideline for river restoration
    Raeymaekers, Joost A. M.
    Maes, Gregory E.
    Geldof, Sarah
    Hontis, Ingrid
    Nackaerts, Kris
    Volckaert, Filip A. M.
    EVOLUTIONARY APPLICATIONS, 2008, 1 (03): : 475 - 488
  • [23] Genetic structure and connectivity among Aedes aegypti populations within Madurai city in Southern India
    Kumar, M. Senthil
    Kalimuthu, M.
    Selvam, A.
    Mathivanan, A.
    Paramasivan, R.
    Kumar, Ashwani
    Gupta, Bhavna
    INFECTION GENETICS AND EVOLUTION, 2021, 95
  • [24] Genetic differentiation among populations of a specialist fishing bat suggests lack of suitable habitat connectivity
    Campbell, Susan
    Guay, Patrick-Jean
    Mitrovski, Paul John
    Mulder, Raoul
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2009, 142 (11) : 2657 - 2664
  • [25] Genetic population differentiation and connectivity among fragmented Moor frog (Rana arvalis) populations in The Netherlands
    Paul Arens
    Theo van der Sluis
    Wendy P. C. van’t Westende
    Ben Vosman
    Claire C. Vos
    Marinus J. M. Smulders
    Landscape Ecology, 2007, 22 : 1489 - 1500
  • [26] Mitochondrial DNA markers reveal genetic connectivity among populations of Osteoglossiform fish Chitala chitala
    Nimisha Dutta
    Rajeev Kumar Singh
    Abhinav Pathak
    Vindhya Mohindra
    Sangeeta Mandal
    Gurjeet Kaur
    Kuldeep Kumar Lal
    Molecular Biology Reports, 2020, 47 : 8579 - 8592
  • [27] Genetic connectivity among osprey populations and consequences for conservation: philopatry versus dispersal as key factors
    Monti, Flavio
    Delfour, Florie
    Arnal, Veronique
    Zenboudji, Saliha
    Duriez, Olivier
    Montgelard, Claudine
    CONSERVATION GENETICS, 2018, 19 (04) : 839 - 851
  • [28] Genetic connectivity among osprey populations and consequences for conservation: philopatry versus dispersal as key factors
    Flavio Monti
    Florie Delfour
    Véronique Arnal
    Saliha Zenboudji
    Olivier Duriez
    Claudine Montgelard
    Conservation Genetics, 2018, 19 : 839 - 851
  • [29] Genetic population differentiation and connectivity among fragmented Moor frog (Rana arvalis) populations in The Netherlands
    Arens, Paul
    van der Sluis, Theo
    van't Westende, Wendy P. C.
    Vosman, Ben
    Vos, Claire C.
    Smulders, Marinus J. M.
    LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2007, 22 (10) : 1489 - 1500
  • [30] Relationship and genetic structure among autoecious and heteroecious populations of Cronartium pini in northern Fennoscandia
    Samils, Berit
    Kaitera, Juha
    Persson, Torgny
    Stenlid, Jan
    Barklund, Pia
    FUNGAL ECOLOGY, 2021, 50