What is the genetic origin of teak (Tectona grandis L.) introduced in Africa and in Indonesia?

被引:43
|
作者
Verhaegen, Daniel [1 ]
Fofana, Inza Jesus [1 ,2 ]
Logossa, Zenor A. [1 ,3 ]
Ofori, Daniel [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] CIRAD Biol Syst Dept Res Unit 39 Genet Divers & B, F-34398 Montpellier 5, France
[2] Univ Cocody, Genet Lab, Abidjan 22, Cote Ivoire
[3] Univ Lome, Fac Sci, Lome, Togo
[4] UST, Biotechnol Lab, Biodivers & Land Use Div, Forestry Res Inst Ghana,Council Sci & Ind Res, Kumasi, Ghana
关键词
Genetic diversity; Genetic structure; Phylogenetic origin; Microsatellite; Tectona grandis; MICROSATELLITE DATA; GENOTYPING ERRORS; DIVERSITY; CONSEQUENCES; POPULATIONS; DISTANCE; QUALITY; NUMBER;
D O I
10.1007/s11295-010-0286-x
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
The first introduction of Tectona grandis in Indonesia took place between the fourteenth and sixteenth centuries and in Africa in the nineteenth century. A total of 1.1 and 0.3 million ha, respectively were planted in the two areas. The extension of teak plantations often started from these first introductions. Unfortunately, the documentation concerning dates, planting stocks and the sources of origin of the teak imported into the different countries was very inaccurate. In this study, the use of 15 microsatellite molecular markers enabled us to compare 22 exotic teak provenances with 17 provenances of the natural range. Results of the analysis showed that the provenances from South India were not related to the provenances that were first introduced in either Africa or Indonesia. Nearly 95% of teak landraces in Benin, Cameroon, Cte d'Ivoire, Tanzania, Togo and Senegal came from North India, and 96% of Indonesian and Ghanaian teak appeared to be very closely linked to Central Laos. The genetic origin of introduced teak was confirmed by the main traits of interest of provenances observed in international trials. Thus, trees from North India had very bad stem forms compared to Laotian and Thai provenances, which generally had good stem forms but low vigour. This genetic knowledge is essential for programmes to develop varieties and to improve the quality of plantations, particularly in Africa.
引用
收藏
页码:717 / 733
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Spectral signatures of teak (Tectona grandis L.) using hyperspectral (EO-1) data
    Ecology Laboratory, Department of Botany, M.S. University of Baroda, Baroda 390 002, India
    Curr. Sci., 2007, 9 (1291-1296):
  • [32] Spectral signatures of teak (Tectona grandis L.) using hyperspectral (EO-1) data
    Christian, Binal
    Krishnayya, N. S. R.
    CURRENT SCIENCE, 2007, 93 (09): : 1291 - 1296
  • [33] PLASTID ULTRASTRUCTURE IN THE CAMBIUM OF TEAK (TECTONA-GRANDIS L F)
    DAVE, YS
    RAO, KS
    ANNALS OF BOTANY, 1982, 49 (03) : 425 - 427
  • [34] Impact of particulate pollution on photosynthesis, transpiration and plant water potential of teak (Tectona grandis L.)
    Anoob, P.
    Santhoshkumar, A. V.
    Roby, Paul C.
    CURRENT SCIENCE, 2017, 112 (06): : 1272 - 1276
  • [35] Sprouting buds in vitro teak (Tectona grandis L.f.)
    Rojas Parajeles, Fabiana
    Abdelnour Esquivel, Ana
    TECNOLOGIA EN MARCHA, 2012, 25 (05): : 67 - 72
  • [36] Genetic Differentiation and Adaptability of Teak (Tectona grandis L.f.) Meta-Population in India
    Vaishnav, Vivek
    Ansari, Shamim Akhtar
    PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY REPORTER, 2018, 36 (04) : 564 - 575
  • [37] GENETIC-STRUCTURE AND MATING SYSTEM IN TEAK (TECTONA-GRANDIS L-F) PROVENANCES
    KERTADIKARA, AWS
    PRAT, D
    SILVAE GENETICA, 1995, 44 (2-3) : 104 - 110
  • [38] Genetic Differentiation and Adaptability of Teak (Tectona grandis L.f.) Meta-Population in India
    Vivek Vaishnav
    Shamim Akhtar Ansari
    Plant Molecular Biology Reporter, 2018, 36 : 564 - 575
  • [39] SSR GENOTYPING-GENETIC DIVERSITY AND FINGERPRINTING OF TEAK (TECTONA GRANDIS) CLONES
    Huang, G. H.
    Liang, K. N.
    Zhou, Z. Z.
    Ma, H. M.
    JOURNAL OF TROPICAL FOREST SCIENCE, 2016, 28 (01) : 48 - 58
  • [40] Degradation ability of wood decay fungi in teak (Tectona grandis L.) wood under storage condition
    Sudha, A.
    Thiribhuvanamala, G.
    Rajamanickam, S.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL BIOLOGY, 2021, 42 (04): : 982 - 987