Weak lensing goes bananas: what flexion really measures

被引:52
|
作者
Schneider, P. [1 ]
Er, X. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bonn, Argelander Inst Astron, D-53121 Bonn, Germany
[2] Max Planck Inst Radioastron, D-53121 Bonn, Germany
关键词
gravitational lensing; galaxies : evolution; galaxies : statistics; cosmology : diffuse radiation;
D O I
10.1051/0004-6361:20078631
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
In weak gravitational lensing, the image distortion caused by shear measures the projected tidal gravitational field of the deflecting mass distribution. To lowest order, the shear is proportional to the mean image ellipticity. If the image sizes are not small compared to the scale over which the shear varies, higher-order distortions occur, called flexion. For ordinary weak lensing, the observable quantity is not the shear, but the reduced shear, owing to the mass-sheet degeneracy. Likewise, the flexion itself is unobservable. Instead, higher-order image distortions measure the reduced flexion, i.e., derivatives of the reduced shear. We derive the corresponding lens equation in terms of the reduced flexion and calculate the resulting relation between brightness moments of source and image. Assuming an isotropic distribution of source orientations, estimates for the reduced shear and flexion are obtained and then tested with simulations. In particular, the presence of flexion affects the determination of the reduced shear. The results of these simulations yield the amount of bias of the estimators as a function of the shear and flexion. We point out and quantify a fundamental limitation of the flexion formalism in terms of the product of reduced flexion and source size. If this product increases above the derived threshold, multiple images of the source are formed locally, and the formalism breaks down. Finally, we show how a general (reduced) flexion field can be decomposed into its four components. Two of them are due to a shear field, carrying an E- and B-mode in general. The other two components do not correspond to a shear field, and they can also be split up into corresponding E- and B-modes.
引用
收藏
页码:363 / 376
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] What Weak Measurements and Weak Values Really Mean: Reply to Kastner
    Eliahu Cohen
    Foundations of Physics, 2017, 47 : 1261 - 1266
  • [22] Hand hygiene monitoring: what it really measures
    Nicol, P.
    Watkins, R.
    JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION, 2007, 67 (02) : 195 - 196
  • [23] What Really Counts? Taking Measure of Measures
    Billings, J. Andrew
    JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2010, 13 (02) : 105 - 106
  • [24] Reducing distance errors for standard candles and standard sirens with weak-lensing shear and flexion maps
    Hilbert, Stefan
    Gair, Jonathan R.
    King, Lindsay J.
    MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2011, 412 (02) : 1023 - 1037
  • [25] The impact of camera optical alignments on weak lensing measures for the Dark Energy Survey
    Antonik, Michelle L.
    Bacon, David J.
    Bridle, Sarah
    Doel, Peter
    Brooks, David
    Worswick, Sue
    Bernstein, Gary
    Bernstein, Rebecca
    DePoy, Darren
    Flaugher, Brenna
    Frieman, Joshua A.
    Gladders, Michael
    Gutierrez, Gaston
    Jain, Bhuvnesh
    Jarvis, Michael
    Kent, Stephen M.
    Lahav, Ofer
    Parker, S. -J.
    Roodman, Aaron
    Walker, Alistair R.
    MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2013, 431 (04) : 3291 - 3300
  • [26] Meniscal translation during knee flexion: what do we really know?
    Scholes, Corey
    Houghton, Eleanor R.
    Lee, Matthew
    Lustig, Sebastien
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2015, 23 (01) : 32 - 40
  • [27] Meniscal translation during knee flexion: what do we really know?
    Corey Scholes
    Eleanor R. Houghton
    Matthew Lee
    Sebastien Lustig
    Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2015, 23 : 32 - 40
  • [28] Gynecologic oncology quality measures: What really matters?
    Chalas, Eva
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2013, 130 (03) : 401 - 402
  • [29] Rationality and politics: What really goes on when funders evaluate the performance of fundees?
    Tassie, B
    Murray, V
    Cutt, J
    Bragg, D
    NONPROFIT AND VOLUNTARY SECTOR QUARTERLY, 1996, 25 (03) : 347 - 363
  • [30] What repeated measures analysis of variances really tells us
    Lee, Younsuk
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2015, 68 (04) : 340 - 345