Enhancing teachers' STEM understanding through observation, discussion and reflection

被引:4
|
作者
Huang, Xiao [1 ]
Erduran, Sibel [2 ]
Zhang, Piaosa [3 ]
Luo, Kangkang [3 ]
Li, Chumni [4 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Normal Univ, Coll Teacher Educ, Jinhua, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Oxford, Dept Educ, Oxford, England
[3] Univ Sains Malaysia, Sch Educ Studies, Minden, Malaysia
[4] Beijing Normal Univ, Dept Phys, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
STEM literacy; stem education; classroom observation; discussion in group; video reflection; ODR; PROFESSIONAL-DEVELOPMENT;
D O I
10.1080/02607476.2021.2006571
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Effective teaching of STEM has become a significant concern for teachers' professional development (PD). Many teachers are not familiar with STEM strategies and do not possess the disciplinary knowledge or pedagogical strategies demanded by STEM teaching. The purpose of the study reported in this paper was to explore the path and model of Chinese teachers' professional development about STEM understanding based on their participation in the Zhejiang-Indiana STEM summer programme. This programme capitalises on strategies referred to as the observation-discussion-reflection (ODR) framework. The participants were 82 teachers who specialise in science, technology, or mathematics and who attended the training activities. There were two weeks of training interventions. Statistical analysis of two groups of teachers' pre-test and post-test, as well as the comparative analysis of two groups, were conducted. The changes in teachers' STEM discipline knowledge as well as their abilities and attitudes were investigated. Overall, the findings indicate variations in how teachers understand the different components of STEM knowledge with integrated knowledge requiring the most attention for further professional development.
引用
收藏
页码:576 / 591
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Asynchronous Discussion Forum: Fostering Reflection among Preservice Math Teachers
    de Leon, Josephine Luz S.
    Prudente, Maricar S.
    2019 10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON E-EDUCATION, E-BUSINESS, E-MANAGEMENT AND E-LEARNING (IC4E 2019), 2019, : 48 - 51
  • [32] ONLINE DISCUSSION FORUMS: A TOOL TO STIMULATE LANGUAGE TEACHERS' INTERACTION AND REFLECTION
    Ribas, Fernanda Costa
    Perine, Cristiane Manzan
    LINGUAS & LETRAS, 2016, 17 (35): : 187 - 210
  • [33] Enhancing Motivation and Engagement Through Collaborative Discussion
    Wu, Xiaoying
    Anderson, Richard C.
    Nguyen-Jahiel, Kim
    Miller, Brian
    JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 105 (03) : 622 - 632
  • [34] Enhancing language teachers' skills for intercultural instruction: affordance of collaborative reflection
    Tajeddin, Zia
    Saeedi, Zari
    Khanlarzadeh, Neda
    LANGUAGE AND INTERCULTURAL COMMUNICATION, 2024, 24 (06) : 693 - 709
  • [35] Empowering Teachers through Core Reflection: A Case in Korea
    Yin, Judy
    JOURNAL OF ASIA TEFL, 2018, 15 (04): : 1005 - 1020
  • [36] Reflection through critical friendship: Promoting growth of teachers
    Kelley, Michaelann
    Curtis, Gayle A.
    Craig, Cheryl J.
    Reid, Donna
    Easley, Annette
    FRONTIERS IN EDUCATION, 2022, 7
  • [37] Developing an understanding procedures observation rubric for mathematics intervention teachers
    Crawford, Angela R.
    Johnson, Evelyn S.
    Zheng, Yuzhu Z.
    Moylan, Laura A.
    SCHOOL SCIENCE AND MATHEMATICS, 2020, 120 (03) : 153 - 164
  • [38] Mutual observation, reflection and discussion and professional development for magistrates: further developments
    Hiskey, G. F.
    JOURNAL OF JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION, 2005, 15 (02):
  • [39] Mining Online Discussion Data for Understanding Teachers' Reflective Thinking
    Liu, Qingtang
    Zhang, Si
    Wang, Qiyun
    Chen, Wenli
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES, 2018, 11 (02): : 243 - 254
  • [40] Development of a formative peer observation protocol for STEM faculty reflection
    Dillon, Heather
    James, Carolyn
    Prestholdt, Tara
    Peterson, Valerie
    Salomone, Stephanie
    Anctil, Eric
    ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2020, 45 (03) : 387 - 400