Spinaplasty following lumbar laminectomy for multilevel lumbar spinal stenosis to prevent iatrogenic instability

被引:11
|
作者
Tuli, Surendra Mohan [3 ]
Kapoor, Varun [3 ]
Jain, Anil K. [1 ,2 ]
Jain, Saurabh [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Coll Med Sci, Delhi 110095, India
[2] GTB Hosp, Delhi 110095, India
[3] Vidyasagar Inst Mental Hlth & Neurosci, New Delhi, India
关键词
Decompression; laminectomies; lumbar canal stenosis; multilevel; posterior ligamentous complex; spinaplasty; SURGICAL-TREATMENT; DECOMPRESSIVE SURGERY; FUSION; SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; INSTRUMENTATION; LAMINOPLASTY; LAMINOTOMY; ADJACENT;
D O I
10.4103/0019-5413.83140
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Iatrogenic instability following laminectomy occurs in patients with degenerative lumbar canal stenosis. Long segment fusions to obviate postoperative instability result in loss of motion of lumbar spine and predisposes to adjacent level degeneration. The best alternative would be an adequate decompressive laminectomy with a nonfusion technique of preserving the posterior ligament complex integrity. We report a retrospective analysis of multilevel lumbar canal stenosis that were operated for posterior decompression and underwent spinaplasty to preserve posterior ligament complex integrity for outcome of decompression and iatrogenic instability. Materials and Methods: 610 patients of degenerative lumbar canal stenosis (n=520) and development spinal canal stenosis (n=90), with a mean age 58 years (33-85 years), underwent multilevel laminectomies and spinaplasty procedure. At followup, changes in the posture while walking, increase in the walking distance, improvement in the dysesthesia in lower limb, the motor power, capability to negotiate stairs and sphincter function were assessed. Forward excursion of vertebrae more than 4 mm in flexion-extension lateral X-ray of the spine as compared to the preoperative movements was considered as the iatrogenic instability. Clinical assessment was done in standing posture regarding active flexion-extension movement, lateral bending and rotations. Results: All patients were followed up from 3 to 10 years. None of the patients had neurological deterioration or pain or catch while movement. Walking distance improved by 5-10 times, with marked relief (70-90%) in neurogenic claudication and preoperative stooping posture, with improvement in sensation and motor power. There was no significant difference in the sagittal alignment as well as anterior translation. Two patients with concomitant scoliosis and one with cauda equine syndrome had incomplete recovery. Two patients who developed disc protrusion, underwent a second operation for a symptomatic disc prolapse. Conclusion: Spinaplasty following posterior decompression for multilevel lumbar canal stenosis is a simple operation, without any serious complications, retaining median structures, maintaining the tension band and the strength with least disturbance of kinematics, mobility, stability and lordosis of the lumbar spine.
引用
收藏
页码:396 / 403
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison of Spinous Process-Splitting Laminectomy versus Conventional Laminectomy for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
    Uehara, Masashi
    Takahashi, Jun
    Hashidate, Hiroyuki
    Mukaiyama, Keijiro
    Kuraishi, Shugo
    Shimizu, Masayuki
    Ikegami, Shota
    Futatsugi, Toshimasa
    Ogihara, Nobuhide
    Hirabayashi, Hiroki
    Kato, Hiroyuki
    ASIAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2014, 8 (06) : 768 - 776
  • [32] Reoperations Following Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis
    Goel, Shakti A.
    Modi, Hitesh N.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, 2018, 52 (06) : 578 - 583
  • [33] POSTOPERATIVE INSTABILITY AFTER DECOMPRESSION FOR LUMBAR SPINAL STENOSIS
    JOHNSSON, KE
    WILLNER, S
    JOHNSSON, K
    SPINE, 1986, 11 (02) : 107 - 110
  • [34] Iatrogenic Spondylolisthesis Following Open Lumbar Laminectomy: Case Series and Review of the Literature
    Ramhmdani, Seba
    Xia, Yuanxuan
    Xu, Risheng
    Kosztowski, Thomas
    Sciubba, Daniel
    Witham, Timothy
    Bydon, Ali
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2018, 113 : E383 - E390
  • [35] NARROW LUMBAR SPINAL CANAL OR LUMBAR SPINAL STENOSIS
    MCKINLEY, LM
    DAVIS, GL
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 1976, (114) : 319 - 325
  • [36] WIDENING OF THE LUMBAR VERTEBRAL CANAL AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO LAMINECTOMY IN THE TREATMENT OF LUMBAR STENOSIS
    SENEGAS, J
    ETCHEVERS, JP
    VITAL, JM
    BAULNY, D
    GRENIER, F
    REVUE DE CHIRURGIE ORTHOPEDIQUE ET REPARATRICE DE L APPAREIL MOTEUR, 1988, 74 (01): : 15 - 22
  • [37] Functional outcome of surgical treatment for multilevel lumbar spinal stenosis
    Panagiotis, Zouboulis E.
    Athanasios, Karageorgos
    Panagiotis, Dimakopoulos
    Minos, Tyllianakis
    Charis, Matzaroglou
    Elias, Lambiris
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA, 2006, 77 (04) : 670 - 676
  • [38] Comparison of Lumbar Laminectomy Alone, Lumbar Laminectomy and Fusion, Stand-alone Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion, and Stand-alone Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Review of the Literature
    Shah, Manan
    Kolb, Bradley
    Yilmaz, Emre
    Halalmeh, Dia R.
    Moisi, Marc D.
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2019, 11 (09)
  • [39] Interspinous device versus laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: a comparative effectiveness study
    Patil, Chirag G.
    Sarmiento, J. Manuel
    Ugiliweneza, Beatrice
    Mukherjee, Debraj
    Nuno, Miriam
    Liu, John C.
    Walia, Sartaaj
    Lad, Shivanand P.
    Boakye, Maxwell
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2014, 14 (08): : 1484 - 1492
  • [40] Surgical outcomes of decompressive laminectomy by transspinous approach for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis
    Ucer, Melih
    Aydin, Ilhan
    Tacyildiz, Abdullah Emre
    Dogan, Ihsan
    Emel, Erhan
    JOURNAL OF THE PAKISTAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2018, 68 (11) : 1618 - 1624