Evaluation of a mainstream genetic testing program for women with ovarian or breast cancer

被引:6
|
作者
Ip, Emilia [1 ,2 ]
Young, Alison Luk [3 ,4 ]
Scheinberg, Tahlia [3 ,5 ,6 ]
Harrison, Michelle [2 ,5 ]
Beale, Philip [4 ,5 ,7 ]
Goodwin, Annabel [1 ,3 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Royal Prince Alfred Hosp, Dept Canc Genet, Missenden Rd, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia
[2] Liverpool Hosp, Dept Canc Genet, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
[3] Univ Sydney, Fac Med & Hlth, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
[4] Univ Sydney, Sydney Catalyst Translat Res Ctr, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
[5] Chris OBrien Lifehouse, Med Oncol, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
[6] Garvan Inst Med Res, Adv Prostate Canc Grp, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia
[7] Concord Repatriat Gen Hosp, Med Oncol, Concord, NSW, Australia
关键词
BRCA; genetic testing; mainstreaming; mutation; ovarian neoplasms;
D O I
10.1111/ajco.13741
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Introduction Mainstream genetic testing refers to genetic testing arranged by a patient's treating specialist. The aim of this study was to retrospectively review a Sydney-based ovarian cancer mainstream genetic testing program. Methods A Cancer Genetics Service (CGS)-supported mainstream genetic testing program was commenced in 2015. The CGS provided training, paperwork and ongoing and adaptable advice regarding appropriate genes for testing and interpretation of results. Written and electronic medical records were reviewed until August 2019 to assess patient and family history characteristics, genetic testing eligibility, results and posttest management for women who had testing coordinated via mainstreaming or by the CGS. Results Genetic testing was arranged for 289 women with ovarian cancer. Prior to 2017, 44% of genetic tests were mainstreamed, compared with 76% of tests from 2017 onwards. CGS was more likely to arrange testing for women with a strong family history of cancer and nonserous pathology. Germline pathogenic variants were detected in 13.7% (19/138) of women who had mainstream testing and 20.3% (14/69) of women tested by the CGS. Referral for posttest counseling occurred for pathogenic variant carriers identified through mainstreaming. Conclusion This study demonstrated successful uptake of a mainstream ovarian cancer genetic testing program by medical oncologists, as evidenced by higher proportion and absolute numbers of eligible ovarian cancer patients accessing genetic testing through this pathway over time. The genetic testing criteria were appropriately assessed by oncologists and posttest referral occurred where required.
引用
收藏
页码:E414 / E419
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The pros and cons of genetic testing for breast and ovarian cancer risk
    Frank, TS
    Braverman, AM
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FERTILITY AND WOMENS MEDICINE, 1999, 44 (03): : 139 - 145
  • [32] Genetic testing for breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility: A family experience
    Van Riper, M
    McKinnon, WC
    JOURNAL OF MIDWIFERY & WOMENS HEALTH, 2004, 49 (03) : 210 - 219
  • [33] Genetic testing for breast and ovarian cancer risk: The psychosocial issues
    Pasacreta, JV
    Jacobs, L
    Cataldo, JK
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NURSING, 2002, 102 (12) : 40 - 47
  • [35] Impact of genetic testing for breast-ovarian cancer susceptibility
    Loader, S
    Shields, CG
    Rowley, PT
    GENETIC TESTING, 2004, 8 (01): : 1 - 12
  • [36] Genetic testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer and the USPSTF recommendations
    Wood, Marie E.
    Garber, Judy E.
    Isaacs, Claudine
    Masood, Shahla
    Bedrosian, Isabelle
    Tung, Nadine
    Chun, Jennifer
    Schnabel, Freya R.
    Arun, Banu K.
    BREAST JOURNAL, 2019, 25 (04): : 575 - 577
  • [37] The changing landscape of genetic testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer
    Bellcross, Cecelia A.
    CURRENT PROBLEMS IN CANCER, 2014, 38 (06) : 209 - 215
  • [38] Genetic testing for patients at risk of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer
    DeTroye, Alisha
    Gabbett, Kayla
    Yi, Cheryl
    Judice, Melanie
    Luu, Victor
    Nelson, Brittany
    Gregory, Tanya
    JAAPA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PHYSICIAN ASSISTANTS, 2022, 35 (10): : 48 - 52
  • [39] Disparities in genetic testing for women with ovarian cancer: a systematic review
    Lin, Jenny
    Feit, Julia
    Khoury, Andrea
    Saganty, Rachel
    Wright, Drew
    Thomas, Charlene
    Christos, Paul
    Sharaf, Ravi
    Frey, Melissa
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2021, 162 : S135 - S136
  • [40] Position statement on genetic testing for women diagnosed with ovarian cancer
    Milch, Vivienne
    Anderson, Katrina
    Chynoweth, Jennifer
    Zorbas, Helen
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 14 : 110 - 110