Evaluation of Ceftaroline Activity versus Daptomycin (DAP) against DAP-Nonsusceptible Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Strains in an In Vitro Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Model

被引:23
|
作者
Steed, Molly [1 ]
Vidaillac, Celine [1 ]
Rybak, Michael J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Wayne State Univ, Eugene Applebaum Coll Pharm & Hlth Sci, Antiinfect Res Lab, Detroit, MI 48201 USA
[2] Wayne State Univ, Sch Med, Detroit, MI 48201 USA
关键词
COMPLICATED SKIN; DOUBLE-BLIND; PHASE-III; CANVAS; VANCOMYCIN-INTERMEDIATE; ANTIMICROBIAL ACTIVITY; SUSCEPTIBILITY; CEPHALOSPORIN; SAFETY; FOSAMIL;
D O I
10.1128/AAC.00347-11
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
The objective of this study was to investigate the potential role of ceftaroline, a new broad-spectrum cephalosporin, as a therapeutic option for the treatment of daptomycin-nonsusceptible (DNS) methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections. Four clinical DNS MRSA strains, R5717, R5563, R5996 (heteroresistant vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus) and R5995 (vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus) were evaluated in a two-compartment hollow-fiber in vitro pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model at a starting inoculum of 10(7) CFU/ml for 96 h. Simulated regimens were ceftaroline at 600 mg every 12 h (q12h) (maximum free-drug concentration [fC(max)], 15.2 mu g/ml; serum half-life [t(1/2)], 2.3 h), daptomycin at 6 mg/kg q24h (fC(max), 7.9 mu g/ml; t(1/2), 8 h), and daptomycin at 10 mg/kg q24h (fC(max), 15.2 mu g/ml; t(1/2), 8 h). Differences in CFU/ml between 24 and 96 h were evaluated by analysis of variance with Tukey's post-hoc test. Bactericidal activity was defined as a >= 3-log(10) CFU/ml decrease in the colony count from the initial inoculum. The ceftaroline MIC values were 0.25, 0.5, 0.5, and 0.5 mu g/ml, and the daptomycin MIC values were 2, 2, 4, and 4 mu g/ml for R5717, R5563, R5996, and R5995, respectively. Ceftaroline displayed sustained bactericidal activity against 3 of the 4 strains at 96 h (R5717, -3.1 log(10) CFU/ml; R5563, -2.5 log(10) CFU/ml; R5996, -5.77 log(10) CFU/ml; R5995, -6.38 log(10) CFU/ml). Regrowth occurred during the daptomycin at 6-mg/kg q24h regimen (4 strains) and the daptomycin at 10-mg/kg q24h regimen (3 strains). At 96 h, ceftaroline was significantly more active, resulting in CFU/ml counts lower than those obtained with daptomycin at 6 mg/kg q24h (4 strains, P <= 0.008) and daptomycin at 10 mg/kg q24 h (3 strains, P <= 0.001). Isolates with increased MIC values for daptomycin (all 4 strains) but not for ceftaroline were recovered. Ceftaroline was effective against the 4 isolates tested and may provide a clinical option for the treatment of DNS MRSA infections.
引用
收藏
页码:3522 / 3526
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Evaluation of vancomycin and daptomycin against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and heterogeneously vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus in an in vitro pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model with simulated endocardial vegetations
    Leonard, Steven N.
    Rybak, Michael J.
    JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2009, 63 (01) : 155 - 160
  • [22] Bactericidal activity of ceftaroline, vancomycin and daptomycin against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from cancer patients
    Rolston, Kenneth V. I.
    Jamal, Mohamed
    Nesher, Lior
    Raad, Issam
    Rice, Seth A.
    Rybak, Michael J.
    Prince, Randall A.
    JOURNAL OF GLOBAL ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE, 2019, 17 : 16 - 18
  • [23] Evaluation of Telavancin Alone and Combined with Ceftaroline or Rifampin against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in an In Vitro Biofilm Model
    Jahanbakhsh, Seyedehameneh
    Singh, Nivedita B.
    Yim, Juwon
    Rose, Warren E.
    Rybak, Michael J.
    ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2018, 62 (08)
  • [24] Daptomycin-β-Lactam Combinations in a Rabbit Model of Daptomycin-Nonsusceptible Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Endocarditis
    Chambers, Henry F.
    Basuino, Li
    Hamilton, Stephanie M.
    Choo, Eun Ju
    Moise, Pamela
    ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2016, 60 (07) : 3976 - 3979
  • [25] CEFTAROLINE: A NEW CEPHALOSPORIN WITH ACTIVITY AGAINST METHICILLIN-RESISTANT STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS (MRSA)
    Varghese, Anu Anna
    Biju, Roshni Acha
    Renuka, R.
    Abraham, Elessy
    INDO AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, 2019, 6 (04): : 7022 - 7028
  • [26] Observed Antagonistic Effect of Linezolid on Daptomycin or Vancomycin Activity against Biofilm-Forming Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in an In Vitro Pharmacodynamic Model
    Luther, Megan K.
    LaPlante, Kerry L.
    ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2015, 59 (12) : 7790 - 7794
  • [27] Vancomycin and Piperacillin-Tazobactam Against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Vancomycin-Intermediate Staphylococcus aureus in an In Vitro Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Model
    Dilworth, Thomas J.
    Leonard, Steve N.
    Vilay, A. Mary
    Mercier, Renee-Claude
    CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2014, 36 (10) : 1334 - 1344
  • [28] Detection of Synergistic Antimicrobial Activities of Ceftaroline, Telavancin, Daptomycin, and Vancomycin Against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Strains in Intensive Care
    Sanal, Laser
    Yilmaz, Neziha
    Uludag, Hatice
    Ozturk, Reyhan
    Sen, Suha
    Cesur, Salih
    JUNDISHAPUR JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY, 2018, 11 (11)
  • [29] Multicenter Cohort Study of Ceftaroline Versus Daptomycin for Treatment of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bloodstream Infection
    Zasowski, Evan J.
    Trinh, Trang D.
    Claeys, Kimberly C.
    Lagnf, Abdalhamid M.
    Bhatia, Sahil
    Klinker, Kenneth P.
    Veve, Michael P.
    Estrada, Sandy J.
    Johns, Scott T.
    Sawyer, Adam J.
    Huang, Vanthida
    LaFrance, Brandi
    Levine, Donald P.
    Kaye, Keith S.
    Davis, Susan L.
    Rybak, Michael J.
    OPEN FORUM INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2022, 9 (03):
  • [30] IN VITRO ACTIVITY OF CHLORHEXIDINE GLUCONATE AGAINST METHICILLIN-RESISTANT AND -SENSITIVE STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS STRAINS
    Opacic, Dolores
    Lepsanovic, Zorica
    Sbutega-Milosevic, Gorica
    ARCHIVES OF BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2013, 65 (03) : 949 - 953