Energy Efficiency Evaluation and Optimization of Industrial Park Customers Based on PSR Model and Improved Grey-TOPSIS Method

被引:10
|
作者
Zhao, Hongshan [1 ]
Li, Jingxuan [1 ]
机构
[1] North China Elect Power Univ, Sch Elect & Elect Engn, Baoding 071003, Peoples R China
关键词
Indexes; Energy efficiency; Optimization; Principal component analysis; Energy consumption; Biological system modeling; Correlation; Energy efficiency evaluation; industrial park customers; pressure-state-response model; Grey-technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution; energy efficiency optimization; MANAGEMENT; INTERNET; ENTROPY; AHP;
D O I
10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3081142
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Energy efficiency evaluation of industrial park customers is carried out to help customers develop optimization strategies and improve the energy efficiency level. The evaluation indexes are proposed based on pressure-state-response (PSR) model and the redundant indexes are selected by combining principal component analysis (PCA) and correlation analysis. Thus the dynamic energy efficiency index system is constructed. The weight of indexes is calculated by the entropy weight method (EWM). An energy efficiency evaluation model based on improved Grey-technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) is proposed, which replaces the Euclidean distance by weighted grey correlation degree and can accurately evaluate customers' energy efficiency level. An energy efficiency optimization model is proposed, which can maximize optimization benefits while improving energy efficiency. The validity of the evaluation and optimization models is verified by the case study of an industrial park.
引用
收藏
页码:76423 / 76432
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Evaluation of the Maturity of Urban Energy Internet Development Based on AHP-Entropy Weight Method and Improved TOPSIS
    Wang, Yongli
    Zhou, Xiangyi
    Liu, Hao
    Chen, Xichang
    Yan, Zixin
    Li, Dexin
    Liu, Chang
    Wang, Jiarui
    ENERGIES, 2023, 16 (13)
  • [42] Double-Layer-Optimizing Method of Hybrid Energy Storage Microgrid Based on Improved Grey Wolf Optimization
    Zhong, Xianjing
    Sun, Xianbo
    Wu, Yuhan
    CMC-COMPUTERS MATERIALS & CONTINUA, 2023, 76 (02): : 1599 - 1619
  • [43] A new energy efficiency evaluation solution for ethylene cracking furnace based on integrated TOPSIS-DEA model
    Meng, Di
    Shao, Cheng
    Zhu, Li
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESEARCH, 2020, 44 (02) : 732 - 755
  • [44] Research on the Performance Evaluation Model of Higher Education Teachers Based on the Improved Grey Clustering Analysis Method
    Li, Wenlu
    Wang, Yinghui
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES IN LEARNING, 2015, 10 (08) : 46 - 50
  • [45] Evaluation method for urban renewable energy utilisation efficiency based on DEA model
    Niu, Lede
    Pan, Mei
    Zhou, Yan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GLOBAL ENERGY ISSUES, 2020, 42 (3-4) : 127 - 143
  • [46] Energy efficiency evaluation method based on multi-model fusion strategy
    Meng Fansheng
    Li Bin
    Yang Donghui
    Yue Zenglei
    Liu Zhi
    Cluster Computing-The Journal of Networks Software Tools and Applications, 2016, 19 (04): : 1937 - 1949
  • [47] Energy efficiency evaluation method based on multi-model fusion strategy
    Meng Fansheng
    Li Bin
    Yang Donghui
    Yue Zenglei
    Liu Zhi
    Cluster Computing, 2016, 19 : 1937 - 1949
  • [48] Evaluation Method of Insulation Paper Deterioration Status with Mechanical-Thermal Synergy Based on Improved TOPSIS Model
    Jiang Y.
    Yu Y.
    Li C.
    Diangong Jishu Xuebao/Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2022, 37 (06): : 1572 - 1582
  • [49] Energy savings bottleneck diagnosis and optimization decision method for industrial auxiliary system based on energy efficiency gap analysis
    Zhu, Xiaochen
    Fuli, Wang
    ENERGY, 2023, 263
  • [50] Chinese regional industrial energy efficiency evaluation based on a DEA model of fixing non-energy inputs
    Shi, Guang-Ming
    Bi, Jun
    Wang, Jin-Nan
    ENERGY POLICY, 2010, 38 (10) : 6172 - 6179