Bankruptcy prediction using multivariate grey prediction models

被引:8
|
作者
Hu, Yi-Chung [1 ]
Jiang, Peng [2 ]
Jiang, Hang [3 ]
Tsai, Jung-Fa [4 ]
机构
[1] Chung Yuan Christian Univ, Chungli, Taiwan
[2] Shandong Univ, Weihai, Peoples R China
[3] Jimei Univ, Xiamen, Peoples R China
[4] Natl Taipei Univ Technol, Taipei, Taiwan
关键词
Bankruptcy prediction; Grey system; Genetic algorithm; Multicriteria Decision-making; Artificial intelligence; NEURAL-NETWORKS; FINANCIAL RATIOS; EMISSIONS; OUTPUT;
D O I
10.1108/GS-12-2019-0067
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
Purpose In the face of complex and challenging economic and business environments, developing and implementing approaches to predict bankruptcy has become important for firms. Bankruptcy prediction can be regarded as a grey system problem because while factors such as the liquidity, solvency and profitability of a firm influence whether it goes bankrupt, the precise manner in which these factors influence the discrimination between failed and non-failed firms is uncertain. In view of the applicability of multivariate grey prediction models (MGPMs), this paper aimed to develop a grey bankruptcy prediction model (GBPM) based on the GM (1,N) (BP-GM (1,N)). Design/methodology/approach As the traditional GM (1,N) is designed for time series forecasting, it is better to find an appropriate permutation of firms in the financial data as if the resulting sequences are time series. To solve this challenging problem, this paper proposes GBPMs by integrating genetic algorithms (GAs) into the GM (1,N). Findings Experimental results obtained for the financial data of Taiwanese firms in the information technology industries demonstrated that the proposed BP-GM (1,N) performs well. Practical implications Among artificial intelligence (AI)-based techniques, GBPMs are capable of explaining which of the financial ratios has a stronger impact on bankruptcy prediction by driving coefficients. Originality/value Applying MGPMs to a problem without relation to time series is challenging. This paper focused on bankruptcy prediction, a crucial issue in financial decision-making for businesses, and proposed several GBPMs.
引用
收藏
页码:46 / 62
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Bankruptcy Prediction Using Logit and Genetic Algorithm Models: A Comparative Analysis
    Leila Bateni
    Farshid Asghari
    [J]. Computational Economics, 2020, 55 : 335 - 348
  • [22] Bankruptcy Prediction Using Logit and Genetic Algorithm Models: A Comparative Analysis
    Bateni, Leila
    Asghari, Farshid
    [J]. COMPUTATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2020, 55 (01) : 335 - 348
  • [23] Analysis of Impact of Using the Trend Variables on Bankruptcy Prediction Models Performance
    Gavurova, Beata
    Janke, Frantisek
    Packova, Miroslava
    Pridavok, Mojmir
    [J]. EKONOMICKY CASOPIS, 2017, 65 (04): : 370 - 383
  • [24] Bankruptcy Prediction Models Based on Value Measures
    Jaki, Andrzej
    Cwiek, Wojciech
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RISK AND FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, 2021, 14 (01)
  • [25] Modelling bankruptcy prediction models in Slovak companies
    Kovacova, Maria
    Kliestikova, Jana
    [J]. INNOVATIVE ECONOMIC SYMPOSIUM 2017 (IES2017): STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP IN INTERNATIONAL TRADE, 2017, 39
  • [26] NEURAL NETWORK MODELS AND THE PREDICTION OF BANK BANKRUPTCY
    TAM, KY
    [J]. OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1991, 19 (05): : 429 - 445
  • [27] Loan defaults and hazard models for bankruptcy prediction
    Foster, Benjamin P.
    Zurada, Jozef
    [J]. MANAGERIAL AUDITING JOURNAL, 2013, 28 (06) : 516 - 541
  • [28] AN EMPIRICAL-COMPARISON OF BANKRUPTCY PREDICTION MODELS
    COLLINS, RA
    [J]. FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, 1980, 9 (02) : 52 - 57
  • [29] BANKRUPTCY PREDICTION MODELS IN THE SERBIAN AGRICULTURAL SECTOR
    Rajin, Danica
    Milenkovic, Danijela
    Radojevic, Tijana
    [J]. EKONOMIKA POLJOPRIVREDA-ECONOMICS OF AGRICULTURE, 2016, 63 (01): : 89 - 105
  • [30] Explainability of Machine Learning Models for Bankruptcy Prediction
    Park, Min Sue
    Son, Hwijae
    Hyun, Chongseok
    Hwang, Hyung Ju
    [J]. IEEE ACCESS, 2021, 9 : 124887 - 124899