Readability of the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry Patient Education Materials

被引:0
|
作者
Amini, Honna [1 ]
Casamassimo, Paul S. [1 ]
Lin, Hsuan L.
Hayes, John R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Coll Dent, Sect Pediat Dent, Pediat Dent Residency Program, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[2] Columbus Childrens Hosp Res Inst, Columbus, OH 43205 USA
关键词
health literacy; readability; patient education materials;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess the readability of the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry's (AAPD) patient education brochures and compare their readability level with that recommended by health education experts. Methods: Readability for the 25AAPD brochures was assessed using the: (1) Flesch-Kincaid formula, (2) Gunning Fog formula, and (3) Flesch reading ease formula. The results were compared to the reading level recommended by the experts. Results. Mean readability for all 25 brochures was: (a) 9.1( +/- 18 SD) using the Flesch-Kincaid formula, (b) 9.2 (+/- 1.5 SD) with the Gunning Fog formula, and (c) 53.0 (+/- 12.2 SD) with the Flesch reading ease formula. Using the Flesch-Kincaid and Gunning Fog formulas, 88% and 92% of the AAPD patient education materials were written above the recommended sixth-grade reading level, respectively. Conclusions. Overall, American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry patient education materials were difficult to read and written above the recommended level for the general public using accepted measures. Readability formulas may be used Os 0 guide to help improve the reading ease of health education materials.
引用
收藏
页码:431 / 435
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [32] Readability, Content, and Quality of Online Patient Education Materials on Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity in the Pediatric Population
    Freed, Karen
    Taylor, Michael G.
    Toledo, Paloma
    Kruse, Jessica H.
    Palanisamy, Arvind
    Lange, Elizabeth M. S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2024, 41 : e341 - e347
  • [33] Utilizing Artificial Intelligence to Increase the Readability of Patient Education Materials in Pediatric Otolaryngology: Comment
    Daungsupawong, Hinpetch
    Wiwanitkit, Viroj
    ENT-EAR NOSE & THROAT JOURNAL, 2024,
  • [34] Readability and Comprehension of Printed Patient Education Materials
    Szabo, Palma
    Biro, Eva
    Kosa, Karolina
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 9
  • [35] Readability of iPledge program patient education materials
    Howard, Rachel
    Smith, Gideon
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 2018, 79 (04) : E69 - E70
  • [36] Readability of Online Patient Education Materials for Glaucoma
    Cheng, Brian T.
    Kim, Anne B.
    Tanna, Angelo P.
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2022, 31 (06) : 438 - 442
  • [37] THE EVALUATION OF PATIENT EDUCATION MATERIALS - FOCUS ON READABILITY
    PASTORE, PO
    BERG, BK
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 1987, 9 (02) : 216 - 219
  • [38] Readability of patient education materials for bariatric surgery
    Adam Timothy Lucy
    Stephanie L. Rakestraw
    Courtney Stringer
    Daniel Chu
    Jayleen Grams
    Richard Stahl
    Margaux N. Mustian
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2023, 37 : 6519 - 6525
  • [39] Readability of patient education materials for bariatric surgery
    Lucy, Adam Timothy
    Rakestraw, Stephanie L. L.
    Stringer, Courtney
    Chu, Daniel
    Grams, Jayleen
    Stahl, Richard
    Mustian, Margaux N. N.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2023, 37 (08): : 6519 - 6525
  • [40] Readability of American Online Patient Education Materials in Urologic Oncology: A Need for Simple Communication
    Pruthi, Amanda
    Nielsen, Matthew E.
    Raynor, Mathew C.
    Woods, Michael E.
    Wallen, Eric M.
    Smith, Angela B.
    UROLOGY, 2015, 85 (02) : 351 - 356