Connective tissue graft as a biological barrier for guided tissue regeneration in intrabony defects: a histological study in dogs

被引:4
|
作者
Ribeiro, Fernando Salimon [1 ]
Farias Pontes, Ana Emilia [1 ]
Zuza, Elizangela Partata [1 ]
da Silva, Vanessa Camila [2 ]
Comelli Lia, Raphael Carlos [1 ]
Marcantonio Junior, Elcio [3 ]
机构
[1] Educ Fdn Barretos UNIFEB, Sch Dent, Dept Master Dent Sci, BR-14783226 Barretos, SP, Brazil
[2] Fed Univ Maranhao UFMA, Sch Dent, Dept Dent 2, Maranhao, MA, Brazil
[3] Sao Paulo State Univ UNESP, Sch Dent, Dept Diag & Surg, Araraquara, SP, Brazil
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
Connective tissue graft(s); Guided tissue regeneration; Periodontal regeneration; Histology; CONTROLLED CLINICAL-TRIAL; AUTOGENOUS PERIOSTEAL GRAFTS; PHOSPHATE BONE-CEMENT; PLATELET-RICH PLASMA; PERIODONTAL REGENERATION; FURCATION DEFECTS; POCKET REDUCTION; MEMBRANES; HUMANS; SUBPERIOSTEAL;
D O I
10.1007/s00784-014-1323-1
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background The use of the autogenous periosteal graft as biological barrier has been proposed for periodontal regeneration. The aim of this study was to evaluate the histometric findings of the subepithelial connective tissue graft as barrier in intrabony defects compared to a bioabsorbable membrane. Methods Three-walled intrabony defects were created surgically in the mesial aspect of the right and left maxillary canines in five healthy mongrel dogs. The defects were chronified, and two types of barriers were randomly carried out for guided tissue regeneration in a split-mouth design: the test group with a subepithelial connective tissue graft and the control group with a bioabsorbable membrane. The specimens were processed for histometric analyses of the epithelium (E), connective tissue (CT), newly formed cementum (NC), new bone (NB), and total newly formed tissues (NFT). Results The test side showed smaller mean of NC (3.6 +/- 1.2), NB (2.1 +/- 0.7), and NFT (7.7 +/- 0.8) than the control group (NC 7.3 +/- 0.5; NB 5.3 +/- 1.3; NFT 10.1 +/- 2.2; P<0.05). No statistically significant differences were verified for E (test 3.1 +/- 2.0; control 2.8 +/- 2.1; P>0.05) and CT (test 2.5 +/- 1.1; control 2.0 +/- 0.5; P>0.05) between groups. Conclusion The bioabsorbable membrane was more effective in maintaining the space for periodontal regeneration than periosteal connective graft when used as barrier. Clinical relevance The bioabsorbable membrane showed more favorable regenerative results in intrabony defects in dogs than the subepithelial connective tissue graft as biological barrier.
引用
收藏
页码:997 / 1004
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Periodontal repair in intrabony defects treated with a calcium carbonate implant and guided tissue regeneration
    Kim, CK
    Choi, EJ
    Cho, KS
    Chai, JK
    Wikesjo, UME
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 1996, 67 (12) : 1301 - 1306
  • [22] Gingival recession treatment: Guided tissue regeneration with bioabsorbable membrane versus connective tissue graft
    Tatakis, DN
    Trombelli, L
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2000, 71 (02) : 299 - 307
  • [23] Digital subtraction radiograph analysis of guided tissue regeneration in human intrabony defects.
    Danesh-Meyer, MJ
    Chen, S
    Rams, TE
    Wikesjö, UME
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2000, 79 : 580 - 580
  • [24] Effect of guided tissue regeneration in intrabony peridontal pockets
    NygaardOstby, P
    Tellefsen, G
    Sigurdsson, TJ
    Zimmerman, GJ
    Wikesjo, UME
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1996, 75 : 108 - 108
  • [25] Guided tissue regeneration in intrabony periodontal defects following treatment with two bioabsorbable membranes in combination with bovine bone mineral graft
    Vouros, I
    Aristodimou, E
    Konstantinidis, A
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2004, 31 (10) : 908 - 917
  • [26] Amnion-Chorion Allograft Barrier Used for Guided Tissue Regeneration Treatment of Periodontal Intrabony Defects: A Retrospective Observational Report
    Holtzclaw, Dan J.
    Toscano, Nicholas J.
    CLINICAL ADVANCES IN PERIODONTICS, 2013, 3 (03): : 131 - 137
  • [27] Retrospective analysis of factors related to clinical outcome of guided tissue regeneration procedures in intrabony defects
    Trombelli, L
    Kim, CK
    Zimmerman, GJ
    Wikesjo, UME
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 1997, 24 (06) : 366 - 371
  • [28] Healing of human intrabony defects following treatment with enamel matrix proteins or guided tissue regeneration
    Sculean, A
    Donos, N
    Windisch, P
    Brecx, M
    Gera, I
    Reich, E
    Karring, T
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTAL RESEARCH, 1999, 34 (06) : 310 - 322
  • [29] Smoking affects the outcome of guided tissue regeneration with bioresorbable membranes: a retrospective analysis of intrabony defects
    Stavropoulos, A
    Mardas, N
    Herrero, F
    Karring, T
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2004, 31 (11) : 945 - 950
  • [30] Assessment of guided tissue regeneration procedures in intrabony defects with bioabsorbable and non-resorbable barriers
    Weltman, R
    Trejo, PM
    Morrison, E
    Caffesse, R
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 1997, 68 (06) : 582 - 590