Connective tissue graft as a biological barrier for guided tissue regeneration in intrabony defects: a histological study in dogs

被引:4
|
作者
Ribeiro, Fernando Salimon [1 ]
Farias Pontes, Ana Emilia [1 ]
Zuza, Elizangela Partata [1 ]
da Silva, Vanessa Camila [2 ]
Comelli Lia, Raphael Carlos [1 ]
Marcantonio Junior, Elcio [3 ]
机构
[1] Educ Fdn Barretos UNIFEB, Sch Dent, Dept Master Dent Sci, BR-14783226 Barretos, SP, Brazil
[2] Fed Univ Maranhao UFMA, Sch Dent, Dept Dent 2, Maranhao, MA, Brazil
[3] Sao Paulo State Univ UNESP, Sch Dent, Dept Diag & Surg, Araraquara, SP, Brazil
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
Connective tissue graft(s); Guided tissue regeneration; Periodontal regeneration; Histology; CONTROLLED CLINICAL-TRIAL; AUTOGENOUS PERIOSTEAL GRAFTS; PHOSPHATE BONE-CEMENT; PLATELET-RICH PLASMA; PERIODONTAL REGENERATION; FURCATION DEFECTS; POCKET REDUCTION; MEMBRANES; HUMANS; SUBPERIOSTEAL;
D O I
10.1007/s00784-014-1323-1
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background The use of the autogenous periosteal graft as biological barrier has been proposed for periodontal regeneration. The aim of this study was to evaluate the histometric findings of the subepithelial connective tissue graft as barrier in intrabony defects compared to a bioabsorbable membrane. Methods Three-walled intrabony defects were created surgically in the mesial aspect of the right and left maxillary canines in five healthy mongrel dogs. The defects were chronified, and two types of barriers were randomly carried out for guided tissue regeneration in a split-mouth design: the test group with a subepithelial connective tissue graft and the control group with a bioabsorbable membrane. The specimens were processed for histometric analyses of the epithelium (E), connective tissue (CT), newly formed cementum (NC), new bone (NB), and total newly formed tissues (NFT). Results The test side showed smaller mean of NC (3.6 +/- 1.2), NB (2.1 +/- 0.7), and NFT (7.7 +/- 0.8) than the control group (NC 7.3 +/- 0.5; NB 5.3 +/- 1.3; NFT 10.1 +/- 2.2; P<0.05). No statistically significant differences were verified for E (test 3.1 +/- 2.0; control 2.8 +/- 2.1; P>0.05) and CT (test 2.5 +/- 1.1; control 2.0 +/- 0.5; P>0.05) between groups. Conclusion The bioabsorbable membrane was more effective in maintaining the space for periodontal regeneration than periosteal connective graft when used as barrier. Clinical relevance The bioabsorbable membrane showed more favorable regenerative results in intrabony defects in dogs than the subepithelial connective tissue graft as biological barrier.
引用
收藏
页码:997 / 1004
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Connective tissue graft as a biological barrier for guided tissue regeneration in intrabony defects: a histological study in dogs
    Fernando Salimon Ribeiro
    Ana Emília Farias Pontes
    Elizangela Partata Zuza
    Vanessa Camila da Silva
    Raphael Carlos Comelli Lia
    Elcio Marcantonio Junior
    Clinical Oral Investigations, 2015, 19 : 997 - 1004
  • [2] Focus on intrabony defects: guided tissue regeneration
    Cortellini, P
    Tonetti, MS
    PERIODONTOLOGY 2000, 2000, 22 : 104 - 132
  • [3] Guided tissue regeneration in intrabony defects.
    DeLima, AFM
    Hebling, E
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1996, 75 : 2470 - 2470
  • [4] Periodontal regeneration in intrabony defects after application of enamel matrix proteins with guided tissue regeneration: An experimental study in dogs
    Onodera, Hiroko
    Shibukawa, Yoshihiro
    Sugito, Hiroki
    Ota, Mikio
    Yamada, Satoru
    BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH-TOKYO, 2005, 26 (02): : 69 - 77
  • [5] Guided periodontal tissue regeneration in interproximal intrabony defects following treatment with a synthetic bioabsorbable barrier
    Hurzeler, MB
    Quinones, CR
    Caffesse, RG
    Schupbach, P
    Morrison, EC
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 1997, 68 (05) : 489 - 497
  • [6] Guided tissue regeneration for periodontal intrabony defects - a Cochrane Systematic Review
    Needleman, I
    Tucker, R
    Giedrys-Leeper, E
    Worthington, H
    PERIODONTOLOGY 2000, 2005, 37 : 106 - 123
  • [7] The Effectiveness of Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft as a Barrier Membrane in Guided Bone Regeneration: A Case Report
    Kabli, Ahmed M.
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (11)
  • [8] Subpedicle connective tissue graft versus guided tissue regeneration with bioabsorbable membrane in the treatment of human gingival recession defects
    Trombelli, L
    Scabbia, A
    Tatakis, DN
    Calura, G
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 1998, 69 (11) : 1271 - 1277
  • [9] Treatment of gingival recession: Comparative study between subepithelial connective tissue graft and guided tissue regeneration
    Rosetti, EP
    Marcantonio, RAC
    Rossa, C
    Chaves, ES
    Goissis, G
    Marcantonio, E
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2000, 71 (09) : 1441 - 1447
  • [10] Guided tissue regeneration of intrabony defects with perforated barrier membranes, simvastatin, and EDTA root surface modification: A clinical and biochemical study
    Issa, Dalia Rasheed
    Abdel-Ghaffar, Khaled A.
    Al-Shahat, Mohamed A.
    Hassan, Ahmed Abdel Aziz
    Iacono, Vincent J.
    Gamal, Ahmed Y.
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTAL RESEARCH, 2020, 55 (01) : 85 - 95