Thermodynamic Optimization of Advanced Organic Rankine Cycle Configurations for Geothermal Energy Applications

被引:4
|
作者
Mustapic, Nenad [1 ]
Brkic, Vladislav [2 ]
Duic, Zeljko [2 ]
Kralj, Toni [1 ]
机构
[1] Karlovac Univ Appl Sci, Trg Josipa Jurja Strossmayera 9, Karlovac 47000, Croatia
[2] Univ Zagreb, Fac Min Geol & Petr Engn, Pierottijeva 6, Zagreb 10000, Croatia
关键词
Organic Rankine Cycle; dual-pressure ORC; double stage serial-parallel ORC configuration; geothermal energy; WASTE HEAT-RECOVERY; WORKING FLUIDS; PERFORMANCE ANALYSES; ORC; SYSTEM; LAYOUTS; DESIGN;
D O I
10.3390/en15196990
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) is commonly accepted as a viable technology to convert from low to medium temperature geothermal energy into electrical energy. In practice, the reference technology for converting geothermal energy to electricity is the subcritical simple ORC system. Over time, geothermal ORC plants with more complex configurations (architectures) have been developed. In the open literature, a large number of advanced architectures or configurations have been introduced. An analysis of the scientific literature indicates that there is some confusion regarding the terminology of certain advanced ORC system architectures. A new categorization of advanced configurations has been proposed, with a special emphasis on the application of geothermal energy. The basic division of advanced plant configurations is into dual-pressure and dual-stage ORC systems. In this study, the real potential of advanced ORC architectures or configurations to improve performance as compared with the simple ORC configuration was explored. The research was conducted for a wide range of geothermal heat source temperatures (from 120 degrees C to 180 degrees C) and working fluids. Net power output improvements as compared with the basic subcritical simple ORC (SORC) configuration were examined. The ability to produce net power with different ORC configurations depends on the magnitude of the geothermal fluid temperature and the type of working fluid. At a lower value of geothermal fluid temperature (120 degrees C), the most net power of 18.71 (kW/(kg/s)) was realized by the dual-pressure ORC (DP ORC configuration) with working fluid R1234yf, while the double stage serial-parallel ORC configuration with a low-temperature preheater in a high-temperature stage ORC (DS parHTS LTPH ORC) generated 18.51 (kW/(kg/s)) with the working fluid combination R1234yf/R1234yf. At 140 degrees C, three ORC configurations achieved similar net power values, namely the simple ORC configuration (SORC), the DP ORC configuration, and the DS parHTS LTPH ORC configuration, which generated 31.03 (kW/(kg/s)) with R1234yf, 31.07 (kW/(kg/s)) with R1234ze(E), and 30.96 (kW/(kg/s)) with R1234ze(E)/R1234yf, respectively. At higher values of geothermal fluid temperatures (160 degrees C and 180 degrees C) both the SORC and DP ORC configurations produced the highest net power values, namely 48.58 (kW/(kg/s)) with R1234ze(E), 67.23 (kW/(kg/s)) with isobutene for the SORC configuration, and 50.0 (kW/(kg/s)) with isobutane and 69.67 (kW/(kg/s)) with n-butane for the the DP ORC configuration.
引用
收藏
页数:36
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Advanced Organic Rankine Cycle for geothermal application
    Preissinger, Markus
    Heberle, Florian
    Brueggemann, Dieter
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LOW-CARBON TECHNOLOGIES, 2013, 8 : I62 - I68
  • [2] Robust optimization of an organic Rankine cycle for geothermal application
    Serafino, Aldo
    Obert, Benoit
    Verge, Lea
    Cinnella, Paola
    [J]. RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2020, 161 : 1120 - 1129
  • [3] Applications of geothermal organic Rankine Cycle for electricity production
    Ahmadi, A.
    Assad, M. El Haj
    Jamali, D. H.
    Kumar, R.
    Li, Z. X.
    Salameh, T.
    Al-Shabi, M.
    Ehyae, M. A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 274
  • [4] Investigation of Energy and Exergy of Geothermal Organic Rankine Cycle
    Alghamdi, Mohammed
    Al-Kharsan, Ibrahim
    Shahab, Sana
    Albaker, Abdullah
    Alayi, Reza
    Kumar, Laveet
    Assad, Mamdouh El Haj
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2023, 16 (05)
  • [5] Thermodynamic Optimization of a Double-pressure Organic Rankine Cycle Driven by Geothermal Heat Source
    Sun, Qingxuan
    Wang, Yaxiong
    Cheng, Ziyang
    Wang, Jiangfeng
    Zhao, Pan
    Dai, Yiping
    [J]. 4TH INTERNATIONAL SEMINAR ON ORC POWER SYSTEMS, 2017, 129 : 591 - 598
  • [6] Thermodynamic optimization and comparative economic analysis of four organic Rankine cycle configurations with a zeotropic mixture
    Sohrabi, Arvin
    Behbahaninia, Ali
    Sayadi, Saeed
    [J]. ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2021, 250
  • [7] Energy and exergy optimization of a combined solar/geothermal organic Rankine cycle power plant
    Maali, Rafika
    Khir, Tahar
    Arici, Muslum
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CENTRAL SOUTH UNIVERSITY, 2023, 30 (11) : 3601 - 3616
  • [8] Exergy and exergoeconomic analyses and optimization of geothermal organic Rankine cycle
    El-Emam, Rami Salah
    Dincer, Ibrahim
    [J]. APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2013, 59 (1-2) : 435 - 444
  • [9] Deterministic Global Optimization of the Design of a Geothermal Organic Rankine Cycle
    Huster, Wolfgang R.
    Bongartz, Dominik
    Mitsos, Alexander
    [J]. 4TH INTERNATIONAL SEMINAR ON ORC POWER SYSTEMS, 2017, 129 : 50 - 57
  • [10] Thermodynamic, economic and thermo-economic optimization of a new proposed organic Rankine cycle for energy production from geothermal resources
    Kazemi, Neda
    Samadi, Fereshteh
    [J]. ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2016, 121 : 391 - 401