Fidelity of the Observational/Reanalysis Datasets and Global Climate Models in Representation of Extreme Precipitation in East China

被引:4
|
作者
He, Sicheng [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Yang, Jing [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Bao, Qing [4 ]
Wang, Lei [4 ,5 ]
Wang, Bin [6 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Normal Univ, State Key Lab Earth Surface Proc & Resource Ecol, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Normal Univ, Acad Disaster Reduct & Emergency Management, Minist Civil Affairs, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Beijing Normal Univ, Fac Geog Sci, Minist Educ, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] Chinese Acad Sci, Lab Numer Modeling Atmospher Sci & Geophys Fluid, Inst Atmospher Phys, Beijing, Peoples R China
[5] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing, Peoples R China
[6] Univ Hawaii Manoa, Dept Atmospher Sci, Honolulu, HI 96822 USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Monsoons; Model evaluation; performance; SUMMER PRECIPITATION; DENSE NETWORK; EVENTS; SENSITIVITY; SIMULATION; RESOLUTION; TRENDS; RAIN; INTERPOLATION; DISASTERS;
D O I
10.1175/JCLI-D-18-0104.1
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
Realistic reproduction of historical extreme precipitation has been challenging for both reanalysis and global climate model (GCM) simulations. This work assessed the fidelities of the combined gridded observational datasets, reanalysis datasets, and GCMs [CMIP5 and the Chinese Academy of Sciences Flexible Global Ocean-Atmospheric Land System Model-Finite-Volume Atmospheric Model, version 2 (FGOALS-f2)] in representing extreme precipitation over East China. The assessment used 552 stations' rain gauge data as ground truth and focused on the probability distribution function of daily precipitation and spatial structure of extreme precipitation days. The TRMM observation displays similar rainfall intensity-frequency distributions as the stations. However, three combined gridded observational datasets, four reanalysis datasets, and most of the CMIP5 models cannot capture extreme precipitation exceeding 150 mm day(-1), and all underestimate extreme precipitation frequency. The observed spatial distribution of extreme precipitation exhibits two maximum centers, located over the lower-middle reach of Yangtze River basin and the deep South China region, respectively. Combined gridded observations and JRA-55 capture these two centers, but ERA-Interim, MERRA, and CFSR and almost all CMIP5 models fail to capture them. The percentage of extreme rainfall in the total rainfall amount is generally underestimated by 25%-75% in all CMIP5 models. Higher-resolution models tend to have better performance, and physical parameterization may be crucial for simulating correct extreme precipitation. The performances are significantly improved in the newly released FGOALS-f2 as a result of increased resolution and a more realistic simulation of moisture and heating profiles. This work pinpoints the common biases in the combined gridded observational datasets and reanalysis datasets and helps to improve models' simulation of extreme precipitation, which is critically important for reliable projection of future changes in extreme precipitation.
引用
收藏
页码:195 / 212
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Consistency of Temperature and Precipitation Extremes across Various Global Gridded In Situ and Reanalysis Datasets
    Donat, Markus G.
    Sillmann, Jana
    Wild, Simon
    Alexander, Lisa V.
    Lippmann, Tanya
    Zwiers, Francis W.
    JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2014, 27 (13) : 5019 - 5035
  • [32] Consistency of extreme temperature changes in China under a historical half-degree warming increment across different reanalysis and observational datasets
    Zhao, Siyao
    Zhou, Tianjun
    Chen, Xiaolong
    CLIMATE DYNAMICS, 2020, 54 (3-4) : 2465 - 2479
  • [33] Precipitation over southern Africa: is there consensus among global climate models (GCMs), regional climate models (RCMs) and observational data?
    Karypidou, Maria Chara
    Katragkou, Eleni
    Sobolowski, Stefan Pieter
    GEOSCIENTIFIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT, 2022, 15 (08) : 3387 - 3404
  • [34] Consistency of extreme temperature changes in China under a historical half-degree warming increment across different reanalysis and observational datasets
    Siyao Zhao
    Tianjun Zhou
    Xiaolong Chen
    Climate Dynamics, 2020, 54 : 2465 - 2479
  • [35] Variability in Antarctic surface climatology across regional climate models and reanalysis datasets
    Carter, Jeremy
    Leeson, Amber
    Orr, Andrew
    Kittel, Christoph
    van Wessem, Jan Melchior
    CRYOSPHERE, 2022, 16 (09): : 3815 - 3841
  • [36] Assessment of summer monsoon precipitation derived from five reanalysis datasets over East Asia
    Huang, Dan-Qing
    Zhu, Jian
    Zhang, Yao-Cun
    Huang, Ying
    Kuang, Xue-Yuan
    QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2016, 142 (694) : 108 - 119
  • [37] Alaska Daily Extreme Precipitation Processes in a Subset of CMIP5 Global Climate Models
    Smalley, Kevin M.
    Glisan, Justin M.
    Gutowski, William J., Jr.
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2019, 124 (08) : 4584 - 4600
  • [38] The response of actual evaporation to global warming in China based on six reanalysis datasets
    Su, Tao
    Feng, Guolin
    Zhou, Jie
    Ye, Min
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLIMATOLOGY, 2015, 35 (11) : 3238 - 3248
  • [39] Similarity and difference of global reanalysis datasets (WFD and APHRODITE) in driving lumped and distributed hydrological models in a humid region of China
    Xu, Hongliang
    Xu, Chong-Yu
    Chen, Sidian
    Chen, Hua
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2016, 542 : 343 - 356
  • [40] Global precipitation measurements for validating climate models
    Tapiador, F. J.
    Navarro, A.
    Levizzani, V.
    Garcia-Ortega, E.
    Huffman, G. J.
    Kidd, C.
    Kucera, P. A.
    Kummerow, C. D.
    Masunaga, H.
    Petersen, W. A.
    Roca, R.
    Sanchez, J. -L.
    Tao, W. -K.
    Turk, F. J.
    ATMOSPHERIC RESEARCH, 2017, 197 : 1 - 20