Soil qualities and change rules of Eucalyptus grandis x Eucalyptus urophylla plantation with different slash disposals

被引:3
|
作者
Zhang, Lin [1 ]
Chen, Zongfu [2 ]
Wu, Qinzhan [2 ]
Huang, Kangting [2 ]
Wen, Jianke [3 ]
Li, Hui [4 ]
Zhu, Lingyue [1 ]
Tang, Yabin [4 ]
Chen, Lijun [1 ]
Wu, Lichao [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Cent South Univ Forestry & Technol, Coll Forestry, Key Lab Soil & Water Conservat & Desertificat Comb, Changsha, Hunan, Peoples R China
[2] State Owned Daguishan Forest Farm, Hezhou, Guangxi, Peoples R China
[3] Guangxi Lvtuo Forestry CO LTD, Nanning, Guangxi, Peoples R China
[4] Guangxi Diyuan Zhiben Fertilizer Co Ltd, Nanning, Guangxi, Peoples R China
[5] Cent South Univ Forestry & Technol, Key Lab Cultivat & Protect Nonwood Forest Trees, Natl Minist Educ, Changsha, Hunan, Peoples R China
关键词
COMMUNITY STRUCTURE; ORGANIC-MATTER; FIRE; PHOSPHORUS; MANAGEMENT; NITROGEN; WATER; DECOMPOSITION; DYNAMICS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-022-25687-0
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Slash disposal changes soil quality by affecting soil properties and nutrient cycling, and the appropriate disposal approaches remain controversial. This work aimed to explore the impact of different slash disposal methods on soil qualities. For this purpose, a Eucalyptus grandis x Eucalyptus urophylla plantation that had been cultivated in 2002 and felled for the third time in 2016 was established in Hezhou City, China. Burning forest (BF, for moderate intensity fire) and no-burning forest (NF) were set in the plantation, and the native evergreen broadleaf forest near the plantation was used as the control (CK). Soils were sampled quarterly in 2017, and 27 indicators that represent soil physical, chemical, and biological properties were analyzed and compared through the analysis of the sustainability index (SI), which adopts five indices to calculate soil quality. The obtained data showed that the indicators of BF and NF, except for the total potassium content, were much lower than those of CK. The physical properties (Max-WHC, CWHC, Min-WHC, MMC, CPD, TPD) of NF were significantly better (29.07%, 30.98%, 29.61%, 52.08%, 21.89%, 19.76%) than those of BF, unlike the chemical properties of BF (SOM, TN, ACa, AFe, AMn, ACu, AZn) were significantly better than those of NF (45.61%, 81.33%, 12.78%, 23.18%, 96.13%, 144.30%, 114.04%). The enzymatic activities of NF (URE, APHO) were significantly better (43.33%, 156.58%)than those of BF, except the activities of INV (- 25.21%). Results of SI showed that the soil quality of CK was much better than that of BF, and NF the worst. But it exhibited the most unevenness of CK, followed by NF, and BF the best. The change rules of BF and NF were contrasting, and soil quality reached the same level after half a year. In summary, the soil qualities, either BF or CK, were not comparable to that of CK. BF increased the soil quality fleetly and transiently, and NF was sustainable for the eucalyptus plantation.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Effect of light intensity on in vitro introduction and multiplication of Eucalyptus grandis x Eucalyptus urophylla
    Costa Souza, Denys Matheus Santana
    Fernandes, Sergio Bruno
    Silva, Eduardo Oliveira
    Duarte, Vinicius Politi
    Goncalves, Douglas Santos
    de Carvalho, Dulcineia
    Teixeira, Gustavo Leal
    Brondani, Gilvano Ebling
    IN VITRO CELLULAR & DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY-PLANT, 2022, 58 (02) : 225 - 239
  • [22] Soil characteristics of Eucalyptus urophylla x Eucalyptus grandis plantations under different management measures for harvest residues with soil depth gradient across time
    Zhu, Lingyue
    Wang, Jiachen
    Weng, Yilin
    Chen, Xiaolong
    Wu, Lichao
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2020, 117
  • [23] Effects of an inducible aiiA gene on disease resistance in Eucalyptus urophylla x Eucalyptus grandis
    Ouyang, L. J.
    Li, L. M.
    TRANSGENIC RESEARCH, 2016, 25 (04) : 441 - 452
  • [24] Decomposition of harvest residues and soil chemical properties in a Eucalyptus urophylla x grandis plantation under different residue management practices in southern China
    Chen, Chen
    Weng, Yilin
    Huang, Kangting
    Chen, Xiaolong
    Li, Hui
    Tang, Yabin
    Zhu, Lingyue
    Wang, Jiachen
    Zhao, Junyu
    Chen, Lijun
    Wu, Lichao
    Xie, Chunjun
    Tang, Jian
    FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2023, 529
  • [25] Genes expression profiles in vascular cambium of Eucalyptus urophylla × Eucalyptus grandis at different ages
    Guo Liu
    Zhihua Wu
    Jianzhong Luo
    Chubiao Wang
    Xiuhua Shang
    Guowu Zhang
    BMC Plant Biology, 23
  • [26] SPECIFIC DENSITY AND DIMENSIONAL VARIATION OF A Eucalyptus urophylla x Eucalyptus grandis CLONAL HYBRID
    Goncalves, Fabricio Gomes
    da Silva Oliveira, Jose Tarcisio
    Della Lucia, Ricardo Marius
    Nappo, Mauro Eloi
    Sartorio, Robert Cardoso
    REVISTA ARVORE, 2009, 33 (02): : 277 - 288
  • [27] Air-drying of Seven Clones of Eucalyptus grandis x Eucalyptus urophylla Wood
    Franca, Frederico J. N.
    Maciel, Andre P. V.
    Franca, Tamara S. F. A.
    Silva, Joao G. M.
    Batista, Djeison C.
    BIORESOURCES, 2019, 14 (03): : 6591 - 6607
  • [28] Silicon attenuates nutritional disorder of phosphorus in seedlings of Eucalyptus grandis x Eucalyptus urophylla
    Reis, Eduarda Goncalves
    de Paula, Rinaldo Cesar
    de Souza Junior, Jonas Pereira
    de Mello Prado, Renato
    Soares, Mariana Bomfim
    Canteral, Kleve Freddy Ferreira
    BMC PLANT BIOLOGY, 2024, 24 (01):
  • [29] INFLUENCE OF CLONE HARVESTING AGE OF Eucalyptus grandis AND HYBRIDS OF Eucalyptus grandis x Eucalyptus urophylla IN THE WOOD CHEMICAL COMPOSITION AND IN KRAFT PULPABILITY
    Damasceno de Morais, Paulo Henrique
    Longue Junior, Dalton
    Colodette, Jorge Luiz
    da Costa Morais, Elisa Helena
    Jardim, Carolina Marangon
    CIENCIA FLORESTAL, 2017, 27 (01): : 237 - 248
  • [30] BARK BEETLE (CURCULIONIDAE: SCOLYTINAE) IN Eucalyptus urophylla x Eucalyptus grandis PLANTATION IN SOUTHERN AMAZON IN ALTA FLORESTA, MATO GROSSO STATE
    Monteiro, Marcelo
    Carvalho, Camila Craus
    Garlet, Juliana
    CIENCIA FLORESTAL, 2018, 28 (03): : 913 - 923