Team Learning Developing interdisciplinary project teams

被引:0
|
作者
Schaffer, Scott P. [1 ]
Chen, Xiaojun [1 ]
Zhu, Xiumei [2 ]
Oakes, William [3 ]
机构
[1] Purdue Univ, Dept Curriculum & Instruct, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[2] Purdue Univ, Dept Commun, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[3] Purdue Univ, Sch Engn Educ, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
关键词
multi-disciplinary teams; cross-disciplinary; self-efficacy; SELF-EFFICACY;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Teachers of STEM students and employers of graduates recognize that success in many professions requires effective multi-disciplinary team performance. While there is abundant evidence that having "diversity" on a team can contribute to greater creativity and innovation, it is not clear how a group of individuals come to function as a team or how they learn from one other [1,2]. To better understand how university students learn in multi-disciplinary teams, 256 undergraduate students participating in teams in the spring of 2010 at a Midwest university were studied. Data collection included self-reported efficacy for cross-disciplinary team learning (CDTL), as well as self-reported attitudes toward team processes and outcomes, and individual characteristics. During the course of the semester, overall self-efficacy for CDTL increased across all respondents. However, a large number of individual students also displayed decreases in self-efficacy from the beginning to the end of the semester. A previously developed framework for CDTL [2] was further tested and modified as part of this study. Individuals with a high "identity" score at the start of the semester tended to report a smaller increase in this score at the end semester, probably for two reasons: they had less room for improvement, and greater likelihood of overestimating their abilities at the start. Several other findings related to team processes and characteristics were identified and will be discussed.
引用
收藏
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Team behaviors as antecedents for team members' work engagement in interdisciplinary health care teams
    Gerbeth, Sebastian
    Mulder, Regina H.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [23] Tools for Developing Effective Interdisciplinary Research Teams in Neurosurgery
    Muhlestein, Whitney E.
    Chang, Kate W. -C.
    Justice, Denise
    Johnson, Sarah
    Brown, Shawn
    Popadich, Miriana
    [J]. WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2023, 178 : 268 - 269
  • [24] Does team stability mediate the relationship between leadership and team learning? An empirical study among Dutch project teams
    Savelsbergh, Chantal M. J. H.
    Poell, Rob F.
    van der Heijden, Beatrice I. J. M.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2015, 33 (02) : 406 - 418
  • [25] Team learning in teacher teams: team entitativity as a bridge between teams-in-theory and teams-in-practice
    Vangrieken, Katrien
    Dochy, Filip
    Raes, Elisabeth
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY OF EDUCATION, 2016, 31 (03) : 275 - 298
  • [26] Team learning in teacher teams: team entitativity as a bridge between teams-in-theory and teams-in-practice
    Katrien Vangrieken
    Filip Dochy
    Elisabeth Raes
    [J]. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 2016, 31 : 275 - 298
  • [27] In liminality: interdisciplinary teams learning through challenges
    Brandshaug, Sigrid Westad
    Sjolie, Ela
    [J]. HIGHER EDUCATION SKILLS AND WORK-BASED LEARNING, 2021, 11 (02) : 406 - 419
  • [28] Creating a realistic experience of an IS project: The team of teams approach
    Lamp, J
    Lockwood, C
    [J]. CHALLENGES OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT IN THE 21ST CENTURY, 2000, : 737 - 740
  • [29] Team cognition: Development and evolution in software project teams
    He, Jun
    Butler, Brian S.
    King, William R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2007, 24 (02) : 261 - 292
  • [30] MANAGEMENT OF VIRTUAL PROJECT TEAMS: GUIDELINES FOR TEAM LEADERS
    Beranek, Peggy M.
    Broder, Joanna
    Reinig, Bruce A.
    Romano, Nicholas C., Jr.
    Sump, Stacia
    [J]. COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2005, 16 : 247 - 259