Comparison of Terrestrial Laser Scanning and Structure-from-Motion Photogrammetry for steep slope mapping

被引:9
|
作者
Nikolakopoulos, Konstantinos G. [1 ]
Antonakakis, Antonis [2 ]
Kyriou, Aggeliki [1 ]
Koukouvelas, Ioannis [1 ]
Stefanopoulos, Panagiotis [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Patras, Dept Geol, Patras, Greece
[2] Metrica SA, 88A Ginossati St, Metamorfosis 14452, Greece
关键词
TLS; UAV; 3D; point cloud; accuracy; LANDSLIDE; SENSORS; SYSTEM; SFM;
D O I
10.1117/12.2326175
中图分类号
TP7 [遥感技术];
学科分类号
081102 ; 0816 ; 081602 ; 083002 ; 1404 ;
摘要
Both Terrestrial Laser Scanner and Structure from Motion photogrammetry are considered as reliable methods for collecting relief elevation data in the form of dense point clouds. The point density is their common big advantage compared to classical survey measurements. Although both methods produce millions of XYZ points, the manner of collecting data is different resulting in point clouds with serious differences. In the current study these two methodologies for 3D point cloud generation are compared. As a test site is considered a part of a well mapped active landslide in western Greece. In this landslide a terrestrial laser scanner was deployed for the collection of 3D information of the steep slopes. At the same time UAVs flights were performed and dense point clouds were also generated. The derived products from the TLS and UAV are compared and the results are presented.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Assessing Repeatability and Reproducibility of Structure-from-Motion Photogrammetry for 3D Terrain Mapping of Riverbeds
    De Marco, Jessica
    Maset, Eleonora
    Cucchiaro, Sara
    Beinat, Alberto
    Cazorzi, Federico
    REMOTE SENSING, 2021, 13 (13)
  • [22] Mapping tall shrub biomass in Alaska at landscape scale using structure-from-motion photogrammetry and lidar
    Alonzo, Michael
    Dial, Roman J.
    Schulz, Bethany K.
    Andersen, Hans-Erik
    Lewis-Clark, Eric
    Cook, Bruce D.
    Morton, Douglas C.
    REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 245
  • [23] Mapping with LIDAR and Structure-from-motion photogrammetry: accuracy assessment of point cloud over multiple platforms
    Freguete, Larissa Marques
    Chu, Tianxing
    Starek, Michael J.
    REMOTE SENSING TECHNOLOGIES AND APPLICATIONS IN URBAN ENVIRONMENTS VI, 2021, 11864
  • [24] Comparing UAS LiDAR and Structure-from-Motion Photogrammetry for Peatland Mapping and Virtual Reality (VR) Visualization
    Kalacska, Margaret
    Arroyo-Mora, J. Pablo
    Lucanus, Oliver
    DRONES, 2021, 5 (02)
  • [25] Combined Use of Terrestrial Laser Scanning and UAV Photogrammetry in Mapping Alpine Terrain
    Sasak, Jan
    Gallay, Michal
    Kanuk, Jan
    Hofierka, Jaroslav
    Minar, Jozef
    REMOTE SENSING, 2019, 11 (18)
  • [26] A Concept for Three-Dimensional particle metrology based on scanning electron microscopy and structure-from-motion photogrammetry
    Tondare1 V.N.
    Tondare1, Vipin N. (vipin.tondare@nist.gov); Tondare1, Vipin N. (vipin.tondare@nist.gov), 1600, National Institute of Standards and Technology (125):
  • [27] Integrating structure-from-motion photogrammetry into rock weathering field methodologies
    Mol, Lisa
    Clarke, Lucy
    EARTH SURFACE PROCESSES AND LANDFORMS, 2019, 44 (13) : 2671 - 2684
  • [28] Photogrammetry is for everyone: Structure-from-motion software user experiences in archaeology
    Jones, Christine A.
    Church, Elizabeth
    JOURNAL OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL SCIENCE-REPORTS, 2020, 30
  • [29] Time lapse structure-from-motion photogrammetry for continuous geomorphic monitoring
    Eltner, Anette
    Kaiser, Andreas
    Abellan, Antonio
    Schindewolf, Marcus
    EARTH SURFACE PROCESSES AND LANDFORMS, 2017, 42 (14) : 2240 - 2253
  • [30] A simplified structure-from-motion photogrammetry approach for urban development analysis
    Iheaturu, Chima
    Okolie, Chukwuma
    Ayodele, Emmanuel
    Egogo-Stanley, Andy
    Musa, Solomon
    Speranza, Chinwe Ifejika
    REMOTE SENSING APPLICATIONS-SOCIETY AND ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 28