The role of affect in science literacy for all

被引:21
|
作者
Fortus, David [1 ]
Lin, Jing [2 ]
Neumann, Knut [3 ]
Sadler, Troy D. [4 ]
机构
[1] Weizmann Inst Sci, Rehovot, Israel
[2] Beijing Normal Univ, Collaborat Innovat Ctr Assessment Basic Educ Qual, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] IPN Leibniz Inst Sci & Math Educ, Kiel, Germany
[4] Univ North Carolina Chapel Hill, Sch Educ, Chapel Hill, NC USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Science literacy; science education standards; motivation; self-efficacy; lifelong learning; SELF-EFFICACY; SCIENTIFIC LITERACY; CONCEPTUAL CHANGE; MOTIVATION; EDUCATION; GOALS;
D O I
10.1080/09500693.2022.2036384
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The goal of science literacy for all underlies much of today's K-12 science education (National Academies of Sciences [2016]. Science literacy: Concepts, contexts, and consequences. National Academies Press; Roberts, [2007]. Scientific literacy/science literacy. In S. K. Abell, & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 729-780). Lawrence Erlbaum). This goal assumes that the citizens of contemporary societies must be able to appreciate the relevance of and draw upon scientific knowledge and practices in a broad range of personal and social issues. Many national science education standards, which aim to promote science literacy for all, focus almost entirely on prescribing the conceptual knowledge and practices that underlie science literacy, with only little, if any, reference to the affective characteristics that need to be fostered in parallel to conceptual knowledge and skills. This position paper highlights why affect is so important for the development of science literacy by critiquing the arguments that underlie many national standards documents and by considering the crucial role affect plays in becoming and remaining a lifelong learner of science. We argue that there is a discrepancy between the science education research literature and many national science education standards in terms of the latter not acknowledging the affective domain as an important education outcome, and that this discrepancy is an obstacle to the attainment of science literacy for all.
引用
收藏
页码:535 / 555
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] POPULAR SCIENCE, A TOOL FOR SCIENCE LITERACY
    Diego, Arceredillo Alonso
    Jose, Hidalgo Navarrete
    AULA DE ENCUENTRO, 2023, 25 (01): : 1 - 3
  • [42] SCIENCE EDUCATION Disparities in science literacy
    Allum, Nick
    Besley, John
    Gomez, Louis
    Brunton-Smith, Ian
    SCIENCE, 2018, 360 (6391) : 861 - 862
  • [43] A culture of literacy in science
    Topping, DH
    McManus, RA
    EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP, 2002, 60 (03) : 30 - 33
  • [44] DECLINING SCIENCE LITERACY
    LAGOWSKI, JJ
    JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL EDUCATION, 1981, 58 (01) : 1 - 1
  • [45] SCIENCE LITERACY FOR WHOM
    ORLIN, J
    SCIENCES-NEW YORK, 1993, 33 (05): : 4 - 4
  • [46] Math and science literacy
    Caldbeck, L
    SCIENCE, 1998, 279 (5359) : 2021 - 2021
  • [47] SCIENCE LITERACY IS POSSIBLE
    HERSHEY, DR
    BIOSCIENCE, 1990, 40 (07) : 482 - 482
  • [48] Linking Science and Literacy
    Plummer, Donna M.
    Davis, Betty Jo
    Brazier, Victoria
    SCIENCE ACTIVITIES, 2011, 48 (03): : 85 - 90
  • [49] Global science literacy
    Gough, N
    SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2004, 88 (01) : 146 - 148
  • [50] Improved science literacy
    Campos, Bibiana
    CHEMICAL & ENGINEERING NEWS, 2022, 100 (04) : 2 - 2