Teaching Bilingual Learners: Effects of a Language-Based Reading Intervention on Academic Language and Reading Comprehension in Grades 4 and 5

被引:48
|
作者
Proctor, C. Patrick [1 ]
Silverman, Rebecca D. [2 ]
Harring, Jeffrey R. [3 ]
Jones, Renata Love [4 ]
Hartranft, Anna M. [5 ]
机构
[1] Boston Coll, Dept Teacher Educ Special Educ Curriculum & Instr, Chestnut Hill, MA 02167 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Dept Curriculum Studies & Teacher Educ, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[3] Univ Maryland, Dept Human Dev & Quantitat Methodol, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[4] Boston Coll, Language Literacy & Culture & Crit Perspect Curri, Chestnut Hill, MA 02167 USA
[5] Univ Maryland, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
关键词
Oral language; Vocabulary; Comprehension; Instructional strategies; methods and materials; Cognitive; Linguistic; Socio-cultural; Discussion; Grammar; Syntax; Metalinguistic Awareness; Oral Language; Spoken Language; Vocabulary-Morphology; Experimental; Quasi-experimental; 3-Early adolescence; VOCABULARY INSTRUCTION; STRUGGLING READERS; CLUSTERED DATA; MORPHOLOGY; 4TH; DISCUSSIONS; PROFICIENCY; KNOWLEDGE; STRATEGY; PEDAGOGY;
D O I
10.1002/rrq.258
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Students are expected to comprehend and produce increasingly complex texts in upper elementary school, and academic language and literacy skills are considered critical to meeting these expectations. Notions of academic language are also controversial and require careful deliberation when applied to traditionally minoritized populations, including bilingual learners who negotiate more than one language in their daily lives and have varied linguistic repertoires. In the present study, the authors report on a quasi-experimental field trial of a theoretically grounded and language-based reading intervention framed around language components (semantics, syntax, and morphology), language functions, discussion, and reading comprehension. A sample of 239 Portuguese-English and Spanish-English bilingual students in grades 4 and 5 worked in small instructional groups to explore language, apply reading strategies, and discuss and write about big ideas in text. Half of the students were assigned to the intervention group (n = 119) and the other half (n = 120) to a business-as-usual control group. Classroom teachers (n = 12) and specialists (n = 10) implemented the intervention with small groups of four to six students. Results showed practically meaningful effects of the intervention on standardized measures of both academic language (Hedges's g = 0.248) and reading comprehension (Hedges's g = 0.166), with implications for theory, research, and classroom practice.
引用
收藏
页码:95 / 122
页数:28
相关论文
共 50 条