共 50 条
Comparison of kidney-tonifying and blood-activating medicinal herbs vs NSAIDs in patients with knee osteoarthritis A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
被引:3
|作者:
Huang, Hetao
[1
]
Huang, Sicong
[2
]
Liang, Guihong
[3
]
Zeng, Lingfeng
[3
]
Pan, Jianke
[3
]
Yang, Weiyi
[3
]
Chen, Hongyun
[3
]
Liu, Jun
[3
]
Pan, Biqi
[4
]
机构:
[1] Guangzhou Univ Chinese Med, Sch Clin Med 2, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Foshan Second Peoples Hosp, Dept Orthopaed, Foshan, Peoples R China
[3] Guangzhou Univ Chinese Med, Guangdong Prov Hosp Chinese Med, Affiliated Hosp 2, Dept Orthopaed, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[4] GuangDong Women & Children Hosp, Dept Tradit Chinese Med, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
来源:
基金:
中国博士后科学基金;
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词:
Chinese medicine;
knee osteoarthritis;
meta-analysis;
randomized control trials;
PROLIFERATION;
CHONDROCYTES;
CAPSULE;
TRIALS;
PAIN;
D O I:
10.1097/MD.0000000000019370
中图分类号:
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号:
1002 ;
100201 ;
摘要:
Background: Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is one of the most common chronic muscular diseases in old people. In recent years. ' people are more and more interested in the use of Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) in the treatment of KOA, such as kidney-tonifying and blood-activating medicinal herbs (KTBAMs) in the treatment of KOA. Many studies have confirmed that KTBAMs are effective in the treatment of KOA. However, it is still unknown whether KTBAMs and NSAIDs are more effective in the treatment of KOA. Therefore, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of KTBAMs and NSAIDs in the treatment of KOA. Methods: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from online databases including PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chinese Scientific Journal Database, Wanfang Data. and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database that compared the efficacy of KTBAMs and NSAIDs in the treatment of KOA were retrieved. The main outcomes included the evaluation of functional outcomes, pain and adverse effects. The Cochrane risk of bias (ROB) tool was used to assess methodological quality. Results: The literature will provide a high-quality analysis of the current evidence supporting KTBAMs for KOA based on various comprehensive assessments including the total effective rate, visual analog scale scores, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Lequence scores, Knee Society Scale (KSS) scores, and adverse effects. Conclusion: This proposed systematic review will provide up-to-date evidence to assess the effect of KTBAMs in the treatment for patients with KOA.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文