Is the Routine Use of Drainage After Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Justified? A Randomized Trial

被引:36
|
作者
Georgiou, Chrysanthos [1 ]
Demetriou, Nicoleta [2 ]
Pallaris, Theodoros [2 ]
Theodosopoulos, Theodosis [3 ]
Katsouyanni, Klea [4 ]
Polymeneas, Georgios [3 ]
机构
[1] Nicosia Gen Hosp, Dept Surg, CY-2029 Nicosia, Cyprus
[2] Larnaca Gen Hosp, Dept Surg, Larnax, Cyprus
[3] Aretaie Hosp, Athens Med Sch, Dept Surg 2, Athens, Greece
[4] Univ Athens, Sch Med, Dept Hyg Epidemiol & Med Stat, GR-11527 Athens, Greece
来源
JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES | 2011年 / 21卷 / 02期
关键词
SURGICAL DRAINAGE;
D O I
10.1089/lap.2010.0003
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the gold standard for the surgical treatment of cholelithiasis. However, the use of drainage after elective LC in literature remains controversial. Methods: A randomized study was performed in Larnaka General Hospital. The purpose of the study was to evaluate drainage of the gallbladder bed after elective LC. One hundred sixteen patients were randomly allocated in two groups, sustained an uneventful LC, and were included in the study after an informed consent was obtained. Sixty-three patients were included in drainage group (YD) and 53 patients in nondrainage group (ND). Drain tubes, made of polyethylene, were placed at the end of the procedure in the patients of YD group. Postoperative pain was assessed using two scales: a 10-point visual analog scale and a 5-point verbal response scale. The two groups were evaluated and compared regarding postoperative pain, the time needed for surgery, length of postoperative hospital stay, the postoperative collection of fluid in the subhepatic space, and the incidence of postoperative complications. Chi-square and t-tests were used to evaluate the data, and statistical significance was established at P < .05. Results: The mean operative time in YD patients was 6.9 minutes longer compared with ND patients (P = .056). The postoperative pain was higher in the YD group by more than one point on the average in the visual analog scale both at 6 and 24 hours (P = .01 and < .001, respectively). When measured with the verbal response scale, the difference in the reported pain was very significant at 24 hours (mean level for YD 1.24 and for ND 0.75). The proportion of patients staying in hospital for > 2 days was higher in the YD group: 28.6% of the patients versus 13.2% in the ND group (P = .05). Subhepatic fluid was more often observed in the YD group (47% versus 34% in the ND), but the difference was not statistically significant. There was no statistical difference in the rate of wound infections, shoulder pain, nausea, vomiting, and respiratory infections between the two groups. Conclusions: Our results indicate that routine drainage of gallbladder bed after elective LC may not be justified. Drainage causes more postoperative pain, prolongs the operative time and hospital stay, increases the occurrence of fluid in the subhepatic space, and does not protect from other complications.
引用
收藏
页码:119 / 123
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The value of routine histopathology analysis of gallbladder specimens after elective and emergency laparoscopic cholecystectomy
    Elafandy, Abdelrahman
    Riaz, Amjad
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2024, 111
  • [32] INTRAOPERATIVE CHOLANGIOGRAPHY - ROUTINE USE ON ELECTIVE CHOLECYSTECTOMY
    NOCCHIKALIL, A
    PEREIRALIMA, L
    JOURNAL DE CHIRURGIE, 1992, 129 (01): : 31 - 34
  • [33] Randomized clinical trial of routine on-table cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy
    Khan, O. A.
    Balaji, S.
    Branagan, G.
    Bennett, D. H.
    Davies, N.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2011, 98 (03) : 362 - 367
  • [34] Is routine preoperative group and save necessary for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy?
    Asif, Zarin
    Stewart, Brian
    Duncan, James
    Mahmud, Sajid
    Zaidi, Syed
    Khan, Khurram
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2020, 107 : 146 - 146
  • [35] Fluorescence or X-ray cholangiography in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized clinical trial
    Lehrskov, L. L.
    Westen, M.
    Larsen, S. S.
    Jensen, A. B.
    Kristensen, B. B.
    Bisgaard, T.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2020, 107 (06) : 655 - 661
  • [36] Is routine drain insertion after laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis beneficial? A multicenter, prospective randomized controlled trial
    Kim, Eun Young
    Lee, Soo Ho
    Lee, Jun Suh
    Yoon, Young Chul
    Park, Sung Kyun
    Choi, Ho Joong
    Yoo, Dong Do
    Hong, Tae Ho
    JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SCIENCES, 2015, 22 (07) : 551 - 557
  • [37] RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY AND MINI-CHOLECYSTECTOMY
    MCGINN, FP
    MILES, AJG
    UGLOW, M
    OZMEN, M
    TERZI, C
    HUMBY, M
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1995, 82 (10) : 1374 - 1377
  • [38] Randomized trial of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and mini-cholecystectomy
    Rozsos, S
    Jako, GJ
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1996, 83 (05) : 708 - 708
  • [39] Randomized trial of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and mini-cholecystectomy
    Wallace, DH
    McMahon, AJ
    ODwyer, PJ
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1996, 83 (02) : 279 - 280
  • [40] Clinical significance of drainage tube insertion in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized controlled trial
    Uchiyama, Kazuhisa
    Tani, Masaji
    Kawai, Manabu
    Terasawa, Hiroshi
    Hama, Takashi
    Yamaue, Hiroki
    JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SURGERY, 2007, 14 (06): : 551 - 556