Evidence of unique and shared responses to major biotic and abiotic stresses in chickpea

被引:47
|
作者
Mantri, Nitin L. [1 ]
Ford, Rebecca [2 ]
Coram, Tristan E. [3 ,4 ]
Pang, Edwin C. K. [1 ]
机构
[1] RMIT Univ, Sch Appl Sci Biotechnol & Environm Biol, Bundoora, Vic 3083, Australia
[2] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne Sch Land & Environm, Melbourne, Vic 3010, Australia
[3] N Carolina State Univ, USDA, ARS, Eastern Reg Small Grains Genotyping Lab, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
[4] N Carolina State Univ, Dept Crop Sci, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
关键词
Chickpea; Drought; Cold; High salinity; Ascochyta blight; cDNA microarray; GENE-EXPRESSION PROFILE; ASCOCHYTA BLIGHT; SALT TOLERANCE; SALICYLIC-ACID; HIGH-SALINITY; ARABIDOPSIS; DROUGHT; PROTEIN; COLD; OVEREXPRESSION;
D O I
10.1016/j.envexpbot.2010.05.003
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Microarrays have been used extensively for transcriptional profiling of plant responses to biotic and abiotic stresses. However, most studies focused on either biotic or abiotic stresses, making it difficult to construe the genes that that may be common to both biotic and abiotic-stress responses. Such information may help molecular breeders to develop cultivars with broad-spectrum resistances to these stresses. A 768-featured boutique microarray was employed to compare the genes expressed by chickpea in response to drought, cold, high salinity and the fungal pathogen Ascochyta rabiei and 46,54,266 and 51 differentially expressed transcripts were identified, respectively. The expression of common genes indicated crosstalk in the genetic pathways involved in responses to these stress conditions. The response of ICC 3996 to A. rabiei was more similar to that of high-salinity stress than to drought or cold stress conditions. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:286 / 292
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The Responses of Wheat Autophagy and ATG8 Family Genes to Biotic and Abiotic Stresses
    Zhang, Jiazi
    Yang, Wenwen
    Yue, Jieyu
    Liu, Yanni
    Pei, Dan
    Wang, Huazhong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PLANT GROWTH REGULATION, 2020, 39 (02) : 867 - 876
  • [32] Editorial: Structural bioinformatics and biophysical approaches for understanding the plant responses to biotic and abiotic stresses
    Sperotto, Raul A.
    Hrmova, Maria
    Graether, Steffen P.
    Timmers, Luis Fernando S. M.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2022, 13
  • [33] Transcriptional Regulation of Biotic and Abiotic Stress Responses: Challenges and Potential Mechanism for Stress Tolerance and Chickpea Improvement
    Rai, Nidhi
    Sarma, Birinchi Kumar
    Rai, Shashi Pandey
    [J]. TROPICAL PLANT BIOLOGY, 2024, 17 (02) : 83 - 107
  • [34] Transcriptional Regulation of Biotic and Abiotic Stress Responses: Challenges and Potential Mechanism for Stress Tolerance and Chickpea Improvement
    Nidhi Rai
    Birinchi Kumar Sarma
    Shashi Pandey Rai
    [J]. Tropical Plant Biology, 2024, 17 : 83 - 107
  • [35] Comprehensive analyses of the SPL transcription factor family in Paulownia fortunei and their responses to biotic and abiotic stresses
    Yang, Haibo
    Zhai, Xiaoqiao
    Zhao, Zhenli
    Fan, Guoqiang
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL MACROMOLECULES, 2023, 226 : 1261 - 1272
  • [36] The miR393-Target Module Regulates Plant Development and Responses to Biotic and Abiotic Stresses
    Jiang, Jinjin
    Zhu, Haotian
    Li, Na
    Batley, Jacqueline
    Wang, Youping
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR SCIENCES, 2022, 23 (16)
  • [37] Metabolic responses of Thellungiella halophila/salsuginea to biotic and abiotic stresses: Metabolite profiles and quantitative analyses
    Pedras, M. Soledade C.
    Zheng, Qing-An
    [J]. PHYTOCHEMISTRY, 2010, 71 (5-6) : 581 - 589
  • [38] Taxonomically Restricted Genes Are Associated With Responses to Biotic and Abiotic Stresses in Sugarcane (Saccharum spp.)
    Cardoso-Silva, Claudio Benicio
    Aono, Alexandre Hild
    Mancini, Melina Cristina
    Sforca, Danilo Augusto
    da Silva, Carla Cristina
    Pinto, Luciana Rossini
    Adams, Keith L.
    de Souza, Anete Pereira
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2022, 13
  • [39] Regulation of biotic interactions and responses to abiotic stresses by MAP kinase pathways in plant pathogenic fungi
    Zhang, Xue
    Wang, Zeyi
    Jiang, Cong
    Xu, Jin-Rong
    [J]. STRESS BIOLOGY, 2021, 1 (01):
  • [40] Meta-Analysis of Common and Differential Transcriptomic Responses to Biotic and Abiotic Stresses in Arabidopsis thaliana
    Biniaz, Yaser
    Tahmasebi, Aminallah
    Afsharifar, Alireza
    Tahmasebi, Ahmad
    Poczai, Peter
    [J]. PLANTS-BASEL, 2022, 11 (04):