Multi-Objective Decision-Making of Cluster Heads Election in Routing Algorithm for Field Observation Instruments Network

被引:8
|
作者
Yang, Jiguang [1 ]
Huo, Jiuyuan [1 ,2 ]
Al-Neshmi, Hamzah Murad Mohammed [1 ]
机构
[1] Lanzhou Jiaotong Univ, Sch Elect & Informat Engn, Lanzhou 730070, Peoples R China
[2] Natl Cryosphere Desert Data Ctr NCDC, Lanzhou 730000, Peoples R China
关键词
Clustering algorithms; Routing; Wireless sensor networks; Optimization; Heuristic algorithms; Sensors; Instruments; Clustering routing algorithms; entropy; field observation instrument network (FOIN); multi-objective decision-making; TOPSIS; MATERIAL SELECTION; ENERGY-EFFICIENT; SENSOR; PROTOCOL; DESIGN; TOPSIS;
D O I
10.1109/JSEN.2021.3119332
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Field observation systems are mainly deployed in the harsh natural environment. These systems principally focus on observation and study within the station currently, which leads to problems such as the inability to form combined network observation and quite challenging to answer the scientific questions of wider regions and scales. To form Field Observation Instruments Networks (FOINs) and accelerate the general automation rate as well as in real-time data exchange in field observation, a multi-objective decision-making mehod named Entropy-based TOPSIS (Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution) Clustering routing algorithm (ETC) for FOIN is proposed in this paper. The ETC algorithm can select the optimal cluster head (Optimal-CH) through multi-objective decision-making and mainly solves the problem that some existing multi-objective optimization algorithms cannot dynamically and objectively allocate weights. The ETC algorithm was compared with some latest work and similar kinds of work from network lifespan, the number of CH and energy consumption in the Matlab simulations experiments. The result shows that the ETC algorithm performs well, enhancing energy conservation and extending the existence of FOIN.
引用
收藏
页码:25796 / 25807
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Multi-objective decision-making of materials selection in green design
    School of Mechanical and Automotive Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China
    Jixie Gongcheng Xuebao, 2006, 8 (131-136):
  • [22] A multi-objective model for computer-mediated decision-making
    Wang, J
    Li, Y
    Proceedings of 2005 International Conference on Public Administration, 2005, : 712 - 718
  • [23] Multi-Objective Decision-Making for Mobile Cloud Offloading: A Survey
    Wu, Huaming
    IEEE ACCESS, 2018, 6 : 3962 - 3976
  • [24] Multi-objective Coevolution and Decision-making for Cooperative and Competitive Environments
    Suresh, Anirudh
    Kongmanee, Jaturong
    Deb, Kalyanmoy
    Boddeti, Vishnu Naresh
    2021 IEEE CONGRESS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION (CEC 2021), 2021, : 1601 - 1608
  • [25] MULTI-OBJECTIVE DECISION-MAKING IN WASTE-DISPOSAL PLANNING
    PERLACK, RD
    WILLIS, CE
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING-ASCE, 1985, 111 (03): : 373 - 385
  • [26] A multi-objective decision-making approach to the journal submission problem
    Wong, Tony E.
    Srikrishnan, Vivek
    Hadka, David
    Keller, Klaus
    PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (06):
  • [27] A Multi-Objective Decision-Making Approach for the Sustainable Maintenance of Roadways
    Shoghli, Omidreza
    De La Garza, Jesus M.
    CONSTRUCTION RESEARCH CONGRESS 2016: OLD AND NEW CONSTRUCTION TECHNOLOGIES CONVERGE IN HISTORIC SAN JUAN, 2016, : 1424 - 1434
  • [28] Application of Improved SAW in the Multi-objective Decision-making Process
    Zhang Hengquan
    Lin Bin
    SYSTEMS, ORGANIZATIONS AND MANAGEMENT: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 3RD WORKSHOP OF INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY IN SCIENTIFIC INVENTIONS, 2009, : 212 - 216
  • [29] Multi-Objective Decision-Making Method for Service Portfolio Design
    Li, Qi
    Miao, Rui
    2019 IEEE 6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND APPLICATIONS (ICIEA), 2019, : 531 - 535
  • [30] MULTI-OBJECTIVE DECISION-MAKING IN WATER-RESOURCE SYSTEM
    NATCHKOV, IG
    SYSTEMS ANALYSIS MODELLING SIMULATION, 1988, 5 (01): : 43 - 50