An investigation of the deactivation behavior of industrial Mo/Al2O3 and Ni-Mo/Al2O3 catalysts in hydrotreating Kuwait atmospheric residue

被引:14
|
作者
Marafi, A
Stainslaus, A
Hauser, A
Matsushita, K
机构
[1] Kuwait Inst Sci Res, Petr Res & Studies Ctr, Petr Refining Dept, Safat 13109, Kuwait
[2] Kuwait Inst Sci Res, Cent Analyt Labs, Safat, Kuwait
[3] Kuwait Inst Sci Res, Petr Energy Ctr Japan, Kuwait Branch Lab, Kuwait, Kuwait
关键词
catalyst deactivation in hydrotreating; hydrometallization; residue upgrading;
D O I
10.1081/LFT-200030942
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The catalyst system for fixed-bed residue hydrotreating processes usually consists of different types of catalysts designed to promote hydrodemetallation (HDM), hydrodesulfurization (HDS) and hydrodenitrogenation (HDN) reactions to desired levels. Overall catalyst life is determined by the performance of the individual catalysts in the different reactors. Therefore, information about the activity, stability, selectivity, and deactivation behavior of the individual catalyst is highly desirable to design improved catalysts that can prolong catalyst life, increase stream efficiency, and improve process economics. In the present work, residue hydrotreating experiments were conducted on two types of industrial hydrotreating catalysts, namely Mo/Al2O3 and Ni-Mo/Al2O3, that have been used as HDM and HDS catalysts, respectively, in an industrial ARDS process. The primary objective of the study was to compare the deactivation behavior of both types of catalyst. The characterization of the used catalysts by elemental analysis, surface area, pore volume, and pore size measurements along with TPO-MS, C-13 NMR, and electron microprobe analysis showed significant differences in the nature of the coke and metal deposits on the two types of catalysts. The role of initial coking, the relative importance of the coke, and metal depositions on the deactivation of the two types of catalyst are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:385 / 408
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] MoS2 morphology and promoter segregation in commercial Type 2 Ni-Mo/Al2O3 and Co-Mo/Al2O3 hydroprocessing catalysts
    Eijsbouts, S
    van den Oetelaar, LCA
    van Puijenbroek, RR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CATALYSIS, 2005, 229 (02) : 352 - 364
  • [32] Effect of sulfiding pressure on the formation of the Ni site on Ni-Mo/Al2O3 and Ni-W/Al2O3
    Koizumi, N
    Yamazaki, M
    Iijima, M
    Yamada, M
    [J]. APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE, 1997, 121 : 429 - 432
  • [33] Pilot plant study of paraffin upgrading by hydrogenation over Ni-Mo/Al2O3 and Ni-W/Al2O3 catalysts
    Sánchez, J
    Tallafigo, MF
    Gilarranz, MA
    Rodríguez, F
    [J]. ENERGY & FUELS, 2004, 18 (05) : 1494 - 1499
  • [34] ON THE PROMOTING EFFECT IN SULFIDED NI-MO/AL2O3 CATALYSTS AS STUDIED BY CHEMISORPTION
    BACHELIER, J
    DUCHET, JC
    CORNET, D
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CATALYSIS, 1984, 87 (02) : 283 - 291
  • [35] KINETICS FOR SIMULTANEOUS HDS, HDN AND HYDROGENATION MODEL REACTIONS - COMPARISON BETWEEN NI-MO/AL2O3 AND CO-MO/AL2O3 CATALYSTS
    ZEUTHEN, PH
    STOLTZE, P
    BARTHOLDY, J
    [J]. ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1987, 193 : 23 - PETR
  • [36] Electrodeposition of Ni-Mo and Ni-Mo-(nano Al2O3) multilayer coatings
    Rezaeiolum, A.
    Aliofkhazraei, M.
    Karimzadeh, A.
    Rouhaghdam, A. S.
    Miresmaeili, R.
    [J]. SURFACE ENGINEERING, 2018, 34 (06) : 423 - 432
  • [37] Characterization and Catalytic Activity of Ni, Mo and Ni-Mo Supported on Al2O3 Systems
    Ezzo, E. M.
    El-Kherbawi, M. A.
    El-Aiashy, M. K.
    Mansour, R. M.
    [J]. EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY, 2012, 55 (03): : 307 - 319
  • [38] SYNERGISM IN HYDRODEAROMATIZATION OVER NI-MO/AL2O3 CATALYST
    NOVAK, M
    ZDRAZIL, M
    [J]. COLLECTION OF CZECHOSLOVAK CHEMICAL COMMUNICATIONS, 1989, 54 (07) : 1753 - 1759
  • [40] Synergetic effect between sulfurized Mo/γ-Al2O3 and Ni/γ-Al2O3 catalysts in hydrodenitrogenation of quinoline
    Liu, Lihua
    Liu, Bin
    Chai, Yongming
    Liu, Yunqi
    Liu, Chenguang
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NATURAL GAS CHEMISTRY, 2011, 20 (02): : 214 - 217