Clinical Predictors of Significant White-Coat Effect in Non-Diabetic Hypertensive Patients

被引:0
|
作者
Huang, Chin-Chou [1 ,2 ,4 ,6 ]
Wu, Tao-Cheng [2 ,4 ,5 ]
Lin, Shing-Jong [1 ,2 ,4 ,5 ]
Chen, Jaw-Wen [1 ,2 ,4 ,6 ]
Leu, Hsin-Bang [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Taipei Vet Gen Hosp, Dept Med Res & Educ, Taipei 112, Taiwan
[2] Taipei Vet Gen Hosp, Div Cardiol, Dept Med, Taipei 112, Taiwan
[3] Taipei Vet Gen Hosp, Hlth Care & Mgmt Ctr, Taipei 112, Taiwan
[4] Natl Yang Ming Univ, Cardiovasc Res Ctr, Taipei 112, Taiwan
[5] Natl Yang Ming Univ, Inst Clin Med, Taipei 112, Taiwan
[6] Natl Yang Ming Univ, Inst Pharmacol, Taipei 112, Taiwan
关键词
Hypertension; Predictors; White-coat effect; AMBULATORY BLOOD-PRESSURE; SUSTAINED HYPERTENSION; PROGNOSTIC VALUE; DETERMINANTS; RISK; HOME; MORTALITY; OFFICE; ASSOCIATION; POPULATION;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: The presence of a clinically important white-coat effect (WCE) may lead to incorrect hypertension management. The aim of our study was to investigate the possible causes of WCE in non-diabetic hypertensive patients. Methods: Consecutive non-diabetic hypertensive patients were evaluated. A comprehensive history-taking and physical check-up were conducted. All patients received a series of studies including office blood pressure (BP), 24-hour ambulatory BP recording, and blood sampling. WCE was defined as the difference between office systolic BP (SBP) and daytime SBP. Significant WCE was defined as [(office SBP - daytime SBP)/office SBP >= 10%]. Results: Totally 121 patients (mean age 45.70 +/- 10.61 years, 45 females) were enrolled into our study. Totally 33 patients (27.3%) had significant WCE in the study. Patients with significant WCE had more female gender (p < 0.001), lower body mass index (p = 0.012), higher office SBP (p < 0.001), lower office heart rate (HR, p = 0.005), lower triglyceride (p = 0.008), alanine aminotransferase (p = 0.021) and aspartate aminotransferase (p = 0.008), and higher high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (p = 0.039). Multivariate analysis showed that female gender [odds ratio (OR) 3.290, 95% confident interval (CI) 1.018-10.631, p = 0.047], office SBP (OR 1.079, 95% CI 1.034-1.125, p < 0.001), and office HR (OR 0.930, 95% CI 0.885-0.978, p = 0.005) could predict the patients with significant WCE. Conclusion: Significant WCE could be predicted by female gender, higher office SBP, and lower office HR. Our current study may help us to identify patients with WCE and to improve the treatment of non-diabetic hypertensive patients.
引用
收藏
页码:151 / 156
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Nursing actions increases the control of hypertensive patients and reduces white-coat effect
    Colosimo, Flavia Cortez
    Bagno Eleuterio da Silva, Stael Silvana
    Toma, Gabriela de Andrade
    Geraldo Pierin, Angela Maria
    REVISTA DA ESCOLA DE ENFERMAGEM DA USP, 2012, 46 : 10 - 15
  • [12] Genome-wide association study of white-coat effect in hypertensive patients
    Rimpela, Jenni M.
    Niiranen, Teemu
    Jula, Antti
    Porsti, Ilkka H.
    Tikkakoski, Antti
    Havulinna, Aki
    Lehtimaki, Terho
    Salomaa, Veikko
    Kontula, Kimmo K.
    Hiltunen, Timo P.
    BLOOD PRESSURE, 2019, 28 (04) : 239 - 249
  • [13] Can Pulse Pressure Predict the White-Coat Effect in Treated Hypertensive Patients?
    Yoon, Hyun Ju
    Ahn, Youngkeun
    Kim, Kye Hun
    Park, Jong Chun
    Park, Jeong Bae
    Park, Chang Gyu
    Youn, Ho Joong
    Choi, Dong Ju
    Shin, Joon-Han
    Kim, Dong-Woon
    Rim, Se Joong
    Bae, Jang Ho
    Kim, Chong Wook
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL HYPERTENSION, 2012, 34 (08) : 555 - 560
  • [14] White-coat hypertension and HOMA index in elderly hypertensive patients
    Noain, AG
    Mellado, AM
    Aguar, RB
    Liarte, MCG
    Duarte, JM
    Asensio, AMB
    Gomez, PC
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2005, 23 : S98 - S98
  • [15] Arterial Stiffness in Treated Hypertensive Patients With White-Coat Hypertension
    Barochiner, Jessica
    Aparicio, Lucas S.
    Alfie, Jose
    Morales, Margarita S.
    Cuffaro, Paula E.
    Rada, Marcelo A.
    Marin, Marcos J.
    Galarza, Carlos R.
    Waisman, Gabriel D.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL HYPERTENSION, 2017, 19 (01): : 6 - 10
  • [16] Prevalence and predictors of white-coat response in patients with treated hypertension
    MacDonald, MB
    Laing, GP
    Wilson, MP
    Wilson, TW
    CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 1999, 161 (03) : 265 - 269
  • [17] The deep-breath test as a diagnostic maneuver for white-coat effect in hypertensive patients
    Augustovski, FA
    Calvo, CB
    Deprati, M
    Waisman, G
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN BOARD OF FAMILY PRACTICE, 2004, 17 (03): : 184 - 189
  • [18] Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring is useful to establish white coat effect in diabetic hypertensive patients as well as in non diabetic hypertensive patients
    Vagropoulos, I.
    Agapidou, A.
    Kontos, V.
    Grigoriadis, N.
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2008, 26 : S188 - S189
  • [19] Managing White-Coat Effect
    Handler, Joel
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL HYPERTENSION, 2008, 10 (08): : 649 - 654
  • [20] Assessment of the white-coat effect
    Gerin, W
    Ogedegbe, G
    Schwartz, JE
    Chaplin, WF
    Goyal, T
    Clemow, L
    Davidson, KW
    Burg, M
    Lipsky, S
    Kentor, R
    Jhalani, J
    Shimbo, D
    Pickering, TG
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2006, 24 (01) : 67 - 74