Ranking of simultaneously presented choice options in animal preference experiments

被引:0
|
作者
Halekoh, Ulrich
Jorgensen, Erik
Jensen, Margit Bak
Pedersen, Lene Juul
Studnitz, Merete
Hojsgaard, Soren
机构
[1] Res Ctr Foulum, Res Unit Stat & Decision Anal, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark
[2] Res Ctr Foulum, Res Unit Behaviour & Stress Biol, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark
[3] Natl Ctr, Danish Agr Advisory Serv, DK-8200 Arhus N, Denmark
关键词
Bayes inference; ethology; Markov chain Monte Carlo; multinomial mixed logistic; random intercept; T-maze;
D O I
10.1002/bimj.200610304
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
We considered experiments where animals chose one of all possible simultaneously presented options. The animals might be observed at repeated occasions. In the ethological literature the analysis is often focused on testing the global hypothesis of no difference in preferences by non-parametric methods. This fails to address the estimation of a ranking. Often this approach cannot adequately reflect the experimental setting and the repeated measurement structure. Therefore, we propose to model the choice probabilities for the options with a multinomial logistic model. The correlation induced by repeated measurements is incorporated by animal specific random intercepts. The ranking of the options is taken as the order of the choice probabilities. Adopting a Bayesian approach samples from the posterior distribution of the choice probabilities provide directly samples from the posterior of the rankings. Based on this an estimate of the ranking and description of its variability can be derived. The computation was performed via Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling and was implemented using WinBUGS. We illustrate our approach with an experiment to determine the preference of pigs for three different rooting materials. The proposed method allowed deriving an overall ranking for different combinations of the materials and the spatial positioning.
引用
收藏
页码:599 / 612
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Constructing D-optimal symmetric stated preference discrete choice experiments
    Demirkale, Fatih
    Donovan, Diane
    Street, Deborah J.
    JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL PLANNING AND INFERENCE, 2013, 143 (08) : 1380 - 1391
  • [42] A stated preference analysis comparing the Analytical Hierarchy Process versus Choice Experiments
    Kallas, Zein
    Lambarraa, Fatima
    Maria Gil, Jose
    FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE, 2011, 22 (02) : 181 - 192
  • [43] Discrete choice experiments identifying attributes influencing treatment preference in mild asthma
    Baggott, Christina
    Hardy, Jo
    Reddel, Helen
    Sparks, Jenny
    Sabbagh, Donah
    Mane, Saras
    Holliday, Mark
    Hancox, Robert J.
    Hansen, Paul
    Beasley, Richard
    Fingleton, James
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2019, 54
  • [44] MEASURING SELECTIVITY FROM MULTIPLE-CHOICE FEEDING-PREFERENCE EXPERIMENTS
    MANLY, BFJ
    BIOMETRICS, 1995, 51 (02) : 709 - 715
  • [45] COMMENTS ON DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF MULTIPLE-CHOICE FEEDING-PREFERENCE EXPERIMENTS
    MANLY, BFJ
    OECOLOGIA, 1993, 93 (01) : 149 - 152
  • [46] Would you choose your preferred option?: Comparing choice and recoded ranking experiments
    Caparros, Alejandro
    Oviedo, Jose L.
    Campos, Pablo
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2008, 90 (03) : 843 - 855
  • [47] Stated and Revealed Preference Issues: Product, patient and physicians' attributes in choice experiments
    Huttin, Christine C.
    TECHNOLOGY AND HEALTH CARE, 2017, 25 (05) : 1005 - 1020
  • [48] Including Opt-Out Options in Discrete Choice Experiments: Issues to Consider
    Campbell, Danny
    Erdem, Seda
    PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2019, 12 (01): : 1 - 14
  • [49] Including Opt-Out Options in Discrete Choice Experiments: Issues to Consider
    Danny Campbell
    Seda Erdem
    The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, 2019, 12 : 1 - 14
  • [50] Evaluating animal welfare with choice experiments: An application to Swedish pig production
    Liljenstolpe, Carolina
    AGRIBUSINESS, 2008, 24 (01) : 67 - 84