Pathobionts in the Vaginal Microbiota: Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis of Three Sequencing Studies

被引:20
|
作者
van de Wijgert, Janneke H. H. M. [1 ,2 ]
Verwijs, Marijn C. [1 ]
Gill, A. Christina [1 ,6 ]
Borgdorff, Hanneke [3 ,7 ]
van der Veer, Charlotte [4 ,8 ]
Mayaud, Philippe [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Liverpool, Inst Infect & Global Hlth, Dept Clin Infect Microbiol & Immunol, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
[2] Univ Utrecht, Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Julius Ctr Hlth Sci & Primary Care, Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam Inst Global Hlth & Dev, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Amsterdam Publ Hlth Serv, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, London, England
[6] Univ Oxford, Dept Biomed Serv, Oxford, England
[7] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Leiden, Netherlands
[8] Malawi Liverpool Wellcome Trust Clin Res Programm, Blantyre, Malawi
基金
欧盟第七框架计划; 英国惠康基金;
关键词
vaginal microbiota; bacterial vaginosis; Streptococcus; Staphylococcus; Enterococcus; Escherichia; pathobionts; ethnicity; BACTERIAL VAGINOSIS; VAGINITIS;
D O I
10.3389/fcimb.2020.00129
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Sequencing studies have shown that optimal vaginal microbiota (VMB) are lactobacilli-dominated and that anaerobes associated with bacterial vaginosis (BV-anaerobes) are commonly present. However, they overlooked a less prevalent but more pathogenic group of vaginal bacteria: the pathobionts that cause maternal and neonatal infections and pelvic inflammatory disease. We conducted an individual participant data meta-analysis of three VMB sequencing studies that included diverse groups of women in Rwanda, South Africa, and the Netherlands (2,044 samples from 1,163 women in total). We identified 40 pathobiont taxa but only six were non-minority taxa (at least 1% relative abundance in at least one sample) in all studies: Streptococcus (54% of pathobionts reads), Staphylococcus, Enterococcus, Escherichia/Shigella, Haemophilus, and Campylobacter. When all pathobionts were combined into one bacterial group, the VMB of 17% of women contained a relative abundance of at least 1%. We found a significant negative correlation between relative abundances (rho = -0.9234), but not estimated concentrations (r = 0.0031), of lactobacilli and BV-anaerobes; and a significant positive correlation between estimated concentrations of pathobionts and BV-anaerobes (r = 0.1938) but not between pathobionts and lactobacilli (r = 0.0436; although lactobacilli declined non-significantly with increasing pathobionts proportions). VMB sequencing data were also classified into mutually exclusive VMB types. The overall mean bacterial load of the >= 20% pathobionts VMB type (5.85 log(10) cells/mu l) was similar to those of the three lactobacilli-dominated VMB types (means 5.13-5.83 log(10) cells/mu l) but lower than those of the four anaerobic dysbiosis VMB types (means 6.11-6.87 log(10) cells/mu l). These results suggest that pathobionts co-occur with both lactobacilli and BV-anaerobes and do not expand as much as BV-anaerobes do in a dysbiotic situation. Pathobionts detection/levels were increased in samples with a Nugent score of 4-6 in both studies that conducted Nugent-scoring. Having pathobionts was positively associated with young age, non-Dutch origin, hormonal contraceptive use, smoking, antibiotic use in the 14 days prior to sampling, HIV status, and the presence of sexually transmitted pathogens, in at least one but not all studies; inconsistently associated with sexual risk-taking and unusual vaginal discharge reporting; and not associated with vaginal yeasts detection by microscopy. We recommend that future VMB studies quantify common vaginal pathobiont genera.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Empathic disequilibrium in schizophrenia: An individual participant data meta-analysis
    Shalev, Ido
    Shamay-Tsoory, Simone G.
    Montag, Christiane
    Assaf, Michal
    Smith, Matthew J.
    Eran, Alal
    Uzefovsky, Florina
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, 2025, 181 : 253 - 261
  • [22] Psychometric Properties of the BAASIS: A Meta-analysis of Individual Participant Data
    Denhaerynck, Kris
    Dobbels, Fabienne
    Kostalova, Barbora
    De Geest, Sabina
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2023, 107 (08) : 1795 - 1809
  • [23] Incorporating Baseline Outcome Data in Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis of Non-randomized Studies
    Syrogiannouli, Lamprini
    Wildisen, Lea
    Meuwese, Christiaan
    Bauer, Douglas C.
    Cappola, Anne R.
    Gussekloo, Jacobijn
    den Elzen, Wendy P. J.
    Trompet, Stella
    Westendorp, Rudi G. J.
    Jukema, J. Wouter
    Ferrucci, Luigi
    Ceresini, Graziano
    Asvold, Bjorn O.
    Chaker, Layal
    Peeters, Robin P.
    Imaizumi, Misa
    Ohishi, Waka
    Vaes, Bert
    Voelzke, Henry
    Sgarbi, Jose A.
    Walsh, John P.
    Dullaart, Robin P. F.
    Bakker, Stephan J. L.
    Iacoviello, Massimo
    Rodondi, Nicolas
    Del Giovane, Cinzia
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY, 2022, 13
  • [24] Methods for meta-analysis of individual participant data from Mendelian randomisation studies with binary outcomes
    Burgess, Stephen
    Thompson, Simon G.
    STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2016, 25 (01) : 272 - 293
  • [25] Meta-analysis of a binary outcome using individual participant data and aggregate data
    Riley, Richard D.
    Steyerberg, Ewout W.
    RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS, 2010, 1 (01) : 2 - 19
  • [26] Analyzing Data of a Multilab Replication Project With Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis
    van Aert, Robbie C. M.
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PSYCHOLOGIE-JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 230 (01): : 60 - 72
  • [27] Vaginal misoprostol versus vaginal dinoprostone for cervical ripening and induction of labour: An individual participant data meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
    Patabendige, Malitha
    Chan, Fei
    Vayssiere, Christophe
    Ehlinger, Virginie
    Van Gemund, Nicolette
    Le Cessie, Saskia
    Prager, Martina
    Marions, Lena
    Rozenberg, Patrick
    Chevret, Sylvie
    Young, David C.
    Le Roux, Paul A.
    Gregson, Sarah
    Waterstone, Mark
    Rolnik, Daniel L.
    Mol, Ben W.
    Li, Wentao
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2024, 131 (09) : 1167 - 1180
  • [28] Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis Including Moderators: Empirical Validation
    Moeyaert, Mariola
    Yang, Panpan
    Xue, Yukang
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL EDUCATION, 2024, 92 (04): : 723 - 740
  • [29] Retrieval barriers in individual participant data reviews with network meta-analysis
    Veroniki, Areti Angeliki
    Stewart, Lesley A.
    Le, Susan P. C.
    Clarke, Mike
    Tricco, Andrea C.
    Straus, Sharon E.
    BMJ EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE, 2023, 28 (02) : 119 - 125
  • [30] Highlighting the Benefits and Disadvantages of Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis in Radiology
    Costa, Andre L. F.
    Lopes, Sergio L. P. C.
    RADIOLOGY-IMAGING CANCER, 2024, 6 (02):