Child wellbeing assessment in child welfare: A review of four measures

被引:24
|
作者
Rosanbalm, Katie D. [1 ]
Snyder, Elizabeth H. [1 ]
Lawrence, C. Nicole [1 ]
Coleman, Kanisha [2 ]
Frey, Joseph J. [2 ]
van den Ende, Johanna B. [1 ]
Dodge, Kenneth A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Ctr Child & Family Policy, Box 90539, Durham, NC 27708 USA
[2] Univ North Carolina Chapel Hill, Sch Social Work, Chapel Hill, NC USA
关键词
Child welfare; Child abuse; Foster care; Child wellbeing; Child functioning; Family functioning; Assessment; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT SCALE; TREATMENT OUTCOME PACKAGE; SERIOUS EMOTIONAL DISTURBANCE; MENTAL-HEALTH-SERVICES; PLACEMENT DECISION-MAKING; YOUTH-SELF-REPORT; BEHAVIOR CHECKLIST; STATE CUSTODY; FOSTER-CARE; RESIDENTIAL-TREATMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.childyouth.2016.06.023
中图分类号
D669 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号
1204 ;
摘要
Child wellbeing is identified as one of the three primary goals for child welfare outcomes, thus strong wellbeing assessment tools are crucial to the monitoring of child welfare success. Data from wellbeing measures can serve to identify child needs, inform case planning, monitor change over time, and evaluate intervention impact at the individual, local, state, and national levels. This paper examines the goals, strengths, and challenges of four wellbeing measures currently used with child welfare populations, namely: the Child and Adolescent Functional Assessment Scale (CAFAS), the Child and Adolescent Needs and Strengths Assessment Tool (CANS), the Child Behavior Checklist and related tools from the Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment (CBCL/ASEBA), and the Treatment Outcomes Package (TOP). For each measure, we describe the content, practical attributes, clinical applications, and evidence of reliability and validity. We explore implementation considerations and provide recommendations for system changes to ensure the optimal use of each instrument. Agencies are encouraged to carefully consider their needs, goals, capacities, and implementation infrastructure to inform selection of tools that will aid them in successfully supporting and monitoring child wellbeing over time. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 16
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] High cost child welfare cases: Child characteristics and child welfare services
    Yampolskaya, Svetlana
    Robst, John
    Armstrong, Mary I.
    CHILDREN AND YOUTH SERVICES REVIEW, 2020, 111
  • [22] Safety assessment in child welfare: A comparison of instruments
    Vial, Annemiek
    Assink, Mark
    Stams, Geert Jan J. M.
    van der Put, Claudia
    CHILDREN AND YOUTH SERVICES REVIEW, 2020, 108
  • [23] An Indian Child Welfare perspective on disproportionality in child welfare
    Crofoot, Thomas L.
    Harris, Marian S.
    CHILDREN AND YOUTH SERVICES REVIEW, 2012, 34 (09) : 1667 - 1674
  • [24] The assessment and management of risk in child welfare services
    Shlonsky, A
    Gambrill, E
    CHILDREN AND YOUTH SERVICES REVIEW, 2001, 23 (01) : 1 - 2
  • [25] THE CHILD ASSESSMENT SCHEDULE - PARENT-CHILD AGREEMENT AND VALIDITY MEASURES
    VERHULST, FC
    ALTHAUS, M
    BERDEN, GFMG
    JOURNAL OF CHILD PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY AND ALLIED DISCIPLINES, 1987, 28 (03): : 455 - 466
  • [26] Taking a Long View in Child Welfare: How Can We Evaluate Intervention and Child Wellbeing Over Time?
    McGhee, Janice
    Mitchell, Fiona
    Daniel, Brigid
    Taylor, Julie
    CHILD ABUSE REVIEW, 2015, 24 (02) : 95 - 106
  • [27] A Systematic Review of Measures of Child Neglect
    Haworth, Simon
    Schaub, Jason
    Kidney, Elaine
    Montgomery, Paul
    RESEARCH ON SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE, 2024, 34 (01) : 17 - 40
  • [28] Animal Abuse, Family Violence, and Child Wellbeing: A Review
    Samara McPhedran
    Journal of Family Violence, 2009, 24 : 41 - 52
  • [29] Animal Abuse, Family Violence, and Child Wellbeing: A Review
    McPhedran, Samara
    JOURNAL OF FAMILY VIOLENCE, 2009, 24 (01) : 41 - 52
  • [30] HEALTH AND WELLBEING OF CHILD
    HOCKENHULL, MC
    TEACHER OF THE DEAF, 1977, 1 (06): : 202 - 208