High-Frequency Impulse Therapy for Treatment of Chronic Back Pain: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Pilot Study

被引:5
|
作者
Amirdelfan, Kasra [1 ]
Hong, Mindy [2 ]
Tay, Bobby [3 ]
Reddy, Surekha [4 ]
Reddy, Vinay [4 ]
Yang, Michael [5 ]
Khanna, Krishn [3 ]
Shirvalkar, Prasad [6 ]
Abrecht, Christopher [7 ]
Gulati, Amitabh [8 ]
机构
[1] IPM Med Grp, Walnut Creek, CA USA
[2] Hinge Hlth, San Francisco, CA USA
[3] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Orthopaed Surg, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[4] Spine & Nerve Diagnost Ctr, Roseville, CA USA
[5] Summit Pain Alliance, Santa Rosa, CA USA
[6] Univ Calif San Francisco, UCSF Weill Inst Neurosci, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[7] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Anesthesia & Perioperat Care, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[8] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF PAIN RESEARCH | 2021年 / 14卷
关键词
HFIT; pain; chronic pain; neuromodulation; noninvasive treatment; ELECTRICAL NERVE-STIMULATION; SPINAL-CORD; SAMPLE-SIZE; TENS; METAANALYSIS;
D O I
10.2147/JPR.S325230
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: This study aims to examine high-frequency impulse therapy (HFIT) impact on pain and function among patients undergoing care for chronic low back pain (CLBP). Methods: A pilot randomized-controlled trial of HFIT system versus sham was conducted across 5 orthopedic and pain center sites in California, USA. Thirty-six patients seeking clinical care for CLBP were randomized. Primary outcome was function measured by the Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT). Secondary outcomes were function (Timed Up and Go [TUG] and Oswestry Disability Index [ODI]), pain (Numerical Rating Scale [NRS]), quality of life (Patient Global Impression of Change [PGIC]), and device use. Patients were assessed at baseline and every week for 4 weeks of follow-up. Mann-Whitney U-test was used to analyze changes in each outcome. Repeated measures ANOVA was used to assess the effect of treatment over time. Results: The average age of subjects was 53.9 +/- 15.7 (mean +/- SD) years, with 12.1 +/- 8.8 years of chronic low back pain. Patients who received an HFIT device had a significantly higher 6MWT score at weeks 2 [Cohen's d (95% CI): 0.33 (0.02, 0.61)], 3 [0.32 (0.01, 0.59)] and 4 [0.31 (0.01, 0.60)], respectively, as compared to their baseline scores (p < 0.05). Patients in the treatment group had significantly lower TUG scores at week 3 [0.30 (0.04, 0.57)] and significantly lower NRS scores at weeks 2 [0.34 (0.02, 0.58)] and 4 [0.41 (0.10, 0.67)] (p < 0.05). Conclusion: A larger-scale RCT can build on the findings of this study to test whether HFIT is effective in reducing pain and improving function in CLBP patients. This study shows encouraging evidence of functional improvement and reduction in pain in subjects who used HFIT. The efficacy and minimally invasive nature of HFIT is anticipated to substantially improve the management of CLBP patients.
引用
收藏
页码:2991 / 2999
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Balneotherapy for chronic low back pain: a randomized, controlled study
    Nur Kesiktas
    Sinem Karakas
    Kerem Gun
    Nuran Gun
    Sadiye Murat
    Murat Uludag
    Rheumatology International, 2012, 32 : 3193 - 3199
  • [22] Comparison of 10-kHz High-Frequency and Traditional Low-Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation for the Treatment of Chronic Back and Leg Pain: 24-Month Results From a Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Pivotal Trial
    Kapural, Leonardo
    Yu, Cong
    Doust, Matthew W.
    Gliner, Bradford E.
    Vallejo, Ricardo
    Sitzman, B. Todd
    Amirdelfan, Kasra
    Morgan, Donna M.
    Yearwood, Thomas L.
    Bundschu, Richard
    Yang, Thomas
    Benyamin, Ramsin
    Burgher, Abram H.
    NEUROSURGERY, 2016, 79 (05) : 667 - 676
  • [23] THE EFFECT OF HIGH-FREQUENCY REPETITIVE OLFACTORY STIMULATION ON PAIN SEVERITY IN CHRONIC BACK PAIN
    Ogunsola, Muyiwa
    Asante, Abisola
    Ebo, Kambi
    Nwulia, Onyeka
    Rai, Narayan
    Hipolito, Maria
    Nwulia, Evaristus
    NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2024, 49 : 450 - 451
  • [24] Trunk stabilization among women with chronic lower back pain: a randomized, controlled, and blinded pilot study
    Andrusaitis, Silvia Ferreira
    Brech, Guilherme Carlos
    Vitale, Gabriela Faller
    D'Andrea Greve, Julia Maria
    CLINICS, 2011, 66 (09) : 1645 - 1650
  • [25] Telerehabilitation for the treatment in chronic low back pain: A randomized controlled trial
    Villatoro-Luque, Francisco Jesus
    Rodriguez-Almagro, Daniel
    Aibar-Almazan, Agustin
    Fernandez-Carnero, Samuel
    Pecos-Martin, Daniel
    Ibanez-Vera, Alfonso Javier
    Castro-Martin, Eduardo
    Achalandabaso-Ochoa, Alexander
    JOURNAL OF TELEMEDICINE AND TELECARE, 2023,
  • [26] Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Effect of Home-Based Exercise on Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain The Japan Low Back Pain Exercise Therapy Study
    Shirado, Osamu
    Doi, Tokuhide
    Akai, Masami
    Hoshino, Yuichi
    Fujino, Keiji
    Hayashi, Kunihiko
    Marui, Eiji
    Iwaya, Tsutomu
    SPINE, 2010, 35 (17) : E811 - E819
  • [27] TREATMENT COVERAGE FOR ACUTE AND CHRONIC BACK PAIN: A PILOT STUDY
    Lin, D. H.
    Murimi, I. B.
    Tierce, J.
    Jones, C. M.
    Alexander, G. C.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2017, 20 (05) : A230 - A230
  • [28] Client-centered therapy vs exercise therapy for chronic low back pain: A pilot randomized controlled trial in Brazil
    Machado, Luciana A. C.
    Azevedo, Daniel C.
    Capanema, Maria B.
    Neto, Tuffi N.
    Cerceau, Daniella M.
    PAIN MEDICINE, 2007, 8 (03) : 251 - 258
  • [29] Comment on the "Assessment of a traditional acupuncture therapy for chronic neck pain: A pilot randomized controlled study"
    Piao, Yuanlin
    COMPLEMENTARY THERAPIES IN MEDICINE, 2011, 19 (06) : 349 - 350
  • [30] Comparison of 10-kHz High-Frequency and Traditional Low-Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation for the Treatment of Chronic Back and Leg Pain: 24-Month Results From a Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Pivotal Trial COMMENTS
    Rubino, Sebastian
    Pilitsis, Julie G.
    Mogilner, Alon Y.
    NEUROSURGERY, 2016, 79 (05) : 676 - 677