THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE RIGHT TO PUBLIC PARTICIPATION IN ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS AS A NEW CONCEPT OF ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION MAKING IN SERBIA

被引:0
|
作者
Drenovak-Ivanovic, Mirjana [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Belgrade, Dept Publ Law, Fac Law, Belgrade, Serbia
关键词
administrative decision making; development of the right to public participation; general administrative procedure; environmental impact assessment;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; D035 [国家行政管理]; D523 [行政管理]; D63 [国家行政管理];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ; 1204 ; 120401 ;
摘要
In recent years, environmental law and pol-icy have undergone a change of governance models, shifting from central state, top-down regulation to more transparent, local decision making structures involving private companies, non-governmental organizations, concerned cit-izens and interest groups. The Aarhus Conven-tion became a part of the Serbian legal system in 2009. Its provisions not only strengthen third-par-ty rights to participate, but furthermore oblige state authorities to be active in involving citizens in environmental decisions. The question arises about the extent of consequences of this devel-opment at the international level for the national legal system.Analysis of the implementation of the Gen-eral Administrative Procedural Act (GAPA) and the Law on Environmental Protection in Serbia shows that social actors used to be allowed to participate in citizens forums and decision mak-ing in environmental matters, and their role was important only if they were directly and individu-ally concerned. This situation changed partially in 2004 with the adoption of new laws. The article examines recent cases in which the public and public concerned were not able to participate in environmental decision making, even though the law stipulated such a possibility. The article examines the consequences of implementing a new model, where representatives of collective interests would be able to infuence environmen-tal decision making, proposed by the Draft of the new GAPA.
引用
收藏
页码:74 / 90
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Innovations in public participation and environmental decision making: Examples from the Great Lakes region
    Konisky, DM
    Beirele, TC
    SOCIETY & NATURAL RESOURCES, 2001, 14 (09) : 815 - 826
  • [32] Subtle implications: public participation versus community engagement in environmental decision-making
    Ross, Helen
    Baldwin, Claudia
    Carter, R. W.
    AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2016, 23 (02) : 123 - 129
  • [33] How law structures public participation in environmental decision making: A comparative law approach
    Akerboom, Sanne
    Craig, Robin Kundis
    ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY AND GOVERNANCE, 2022, 32 (03) : 232 - 246
  • [34] Challenges in Public Participation and Collaboration: A Case Study in Finnish Environmental Decision-making
    Paunu, Annarnaij A.
    Pansio, Jenni
    Helander, Nina
    Kapyla, Jonna
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 12TH INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY, KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING AND KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT (KMIS), VOL 3, 2020, : 172 - 179
  • [35] The role of participation in environmental decision-making
    Apostolidou, V. P.
    Sophoulis, C. M.
    PROCEEDING OF THE 9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY VOL B - POSTER PRESENTATIONS, 2005, : B1052 - B1057
  • [36] A comparative review and framework development on public participation for decision-making in Chinese public projects
    Zhou, Yijun
    Hou, Lei
    Yang, Yu
    Chong, Heap-Yih
    Moon, Sungkon
    ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2019, 75 : 79 - 87
  • [37] The right kind of participation? The effect of a deliberative mini-public on the perceived legitimacy of public decision-making
    Jacobs, Daan
    Kaufmann, Wesley
    PUBLIC MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2021, 23 (01) : 91 - 111
  • [38] PARTICIPATION OF FOSTER PARENTS IN DECISION MAKING - CONCEPT OF COLLEGIALITY
    REISTROFFER, ME
    CHILD WELFARE, 1972, 51 (01) : 25 - 29
  • [39] Is the Commission a "lawmaker"? On the right of initiative, institutional transparency and public participation in decision-making: ClientEarth
    Wyatt, Daniel
    COMMON MARKET LAW REVIEW, 2019, 56 (03): : 825 - 841
  • [40] Public participation in decision-making on the coverage of new antivirals for hepatitis C
    Kieslich, Katharina
    Ahn, Jeonghoon
    Badano, Gabriele
    Chalkidou, Kalipso
    Cubillos, Leonardo
    Hauegen, Renata Curi
    Henshall, Chris
    Krubiner, Carleigh B.
    Littlejohns, Peter
    Lu, Lanting
    Pearson, Steven D.
    Rid, Annette
    Whitty, Jennifer A.
    Wilson, James
    JOURNAL OF HEALTH ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT, 2016, 30 (05) : 769 - 785