Recent Advances in Measurement and Dietary Mitigation of enteric Methane emissions in Ruminants

被引:88
|
作者
Patra, Amlan K. [1 ]
机构
[1] West Bengal Univ Anim & Fishery Sci, Fac Vet & Anim Sci, Dept Anim Nutr, Kolkata, India
关键词
methane; ruminants; measurement method; mitigation technology; diet; SF6 TRACER TECHNIQUE; SULFUR-HEXAFLUORIDE TRACER; NITROUS-OXIDE EMISSIONS; FATTY-ACID PROFILES; DAIRY-COWS; GAS-PRODUCTION; IN-VITRO; BEEF-CATTLE; MICROBIAL-POPULATIONS; RESPIRATION CHAMBERS;
D O I
10.3389/fvets.2016.00039
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
Methane (CH4) emission, which is mainly produced during normal fermentation of feeds by the rumen microorganisms, represents a major contributor to the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Several enteric CH4 mitigation technologies have been explored recently. A number of new techniques have also been developed and existing techniques have been improved in order to evaluate CH4 mitigation technologies and prepare an inventory of GHG emissions precisely. The aim of this review is to discuss different CH4 measuring and mitigation technologies, which have been recently developed. Respiration chamber technique is still considered as a gold standard technique due to its greater precision and reproducibility in CH4 measurements. With the adoption of recent recommendations for improving the technique, the SF6 method can be used with a high level of precision similar to the chamber technique. Short-term measurement techniques of CH4 measurements generally invite considerable within- and between-animal variations. Among the short-term measuring techniques, Greenfeed and methane hood systems are likely more suitable for evaluation of CH4 mitigation studies, if measurements could be obtained at different times of the day relative to the diurnal cycle of the CH4 production. Carbon dioxide and CH4 ratio, sniffer, and other short-term breath analysis techniques are more suitable for on farm screening of large number of animals to generate the data of low CH4-producing animals for genetic selection purposes. Different indirect measuring techniques are also investigated in recent years. Several new dietary CH4 mitigation technologies have been explored, but only a few of them are practical and cost-effective. Future research should be directed toward both the medium- and long-term mitigation strategies, which could be utilized on farms to accomplish substantial reductions of CH4 emissions and to profitably reduce carbon footprint of livestock production systems. This review presents recent developments and critical analysis on different measurements and dietary mitigation of enteric CH4 emissions technologies.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Effect of Dietary Nitrates and Sulfates on Enteric Methane Mitigation in Finishing Cattle
    Abdelmoteleb, Mohamed
    Knoell, Allie
    Fernando, Samodha
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2020, 98 : 220 - 220
  • [32] Dietary manipulation: a sustainable way to mitigate methane emissions from ruminants
    Haque, Md Najmul
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 60
  • [33] Measurement of enteric methane from ruminants using a hand-held laser methane detector
    Chagunda, M. G. G.
    Ross, D.
    Rooke, J.
    Yan, T.
    Douglas, J. -L.
    Poret, L.
    McEwan, N. R.
    Teeranavattanakul, P.
    Roberts, D. J.
    ACTA AGRICULTURAE SCANDINAVICA SECTION A-ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2013, 63 (02): : 68 - 75
  • [34] Evaluation of an enteric methane emissions measurement system for cattle.
    Andreini, E. M.
    Calvo-Lorenzo, M. S.
    Richards, C. J.
    White, J. E.
    Place, S. E.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2016, 94 : 576 - 577
  • [35] Enteric methane mitigation interventions
    Fouts, Julia Q.
    Honan, Mallory C.
    Roque, Breanna M.
    Tricarico, Juan M.
    Kebreab, Ermias
    TRANSLATIONAL ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2022, 6 (02)
  • [36] Reducing the carbon footprint of Australian milk production by mitigation of enteric methane emissions
    Moate, Peter J.
    Deighton, Matthew H.
    Williams, S. Richard O.
    Pryce, Jennie E.
    Hayes, Ben J.
    Jacobs, Joe L.
    Eckard, Richard J.
    Hannah, Murray C.
    Wales, William J.
    ANIMAL PRODUCTION SCIENCE, 2016, 56 (07) : 1017 - 1034
  • [37] Symposium review: Development of a funding program to support research on enteric methane mitigation from ruminants
    Tricarico, J. M.
    de Haas, Y.
    Hristov, A. N.
    Kebreab, E.
    Kurt, T.
    Mitloehner, F.
    Pitta, D.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2022, 105 (10) : 8535 - 8542
  • [38] The effects of dietary supplementation with 3-nitrooxypropanol on enteric methane emissions, rumen fermentation, and production performance in ruminants: a meta-analysis
    Kim, Hanbeen
    Le, Hyo Gun
    Beek, Youl-Chang
    Lee, Seyoung
    Seo, Jakyeom
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 62 (01) : 31 - 42
  • [39] Feed additives for methane mitigation: Modeling the impact of feed additives on enteric methane emission of ruminants-Approaches and recommendations
    Dijkstra, Jan
    Bannink, Andre
    S., Guilhermo F.
    Ellis, Jennifer L.
    Eugene, Maguy
    Garcia, Florencia
    Niu, Mutian
    Vibart, Ronaldo E.
    Yanez-Ruiz, David R.
    Kebreab, Ermias
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2025, 108 (01) : 356 - 374
  • [40] Animal board invited review: genetic possibilities to reduce enteric methane emissions from ruminants
    Pickering, N. K.
    Oddy, V. H.
    Basarab, J.
    Cammack, K.
    Hayes, B.
    Hegarty, R. S.
    Lassen, J.
    McEwan, J. C.
    Miller, S.
    Pinares-Patino, C. S.
    de Haas, Y.
    ANIMAL, 2015, 9 (09) : 1431 - 1440