Testing vision testing: quantifying the effect of movement on visual acuity measurement

被引:5
|
作者
Tidbury, L. P. [1 ,2 ]
O'Connor, A. R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Liverpool, Directorate Orthopt & Vis Sci, Liverpool L69 3GB, Merseyside, England
[2] Univ Liverpool, Dept Psychol Sci, Liverpool L69 3GB, Merseyside, England
关键词
COMPACT REDUCED LOGMAR; ETDRS LOGMAR; CHART;
D O I
10.1038/eye.2014.247
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose Assessment of visual acuity (VA) has been shown to vary between tests, which may be attributable in part to test inaccuracies, such as a change in the distance between the chart and subject. Therefore, the study aim was to quantify changes in chart/ patient separation during near and distance VA testing, and to analyse the relationship between VA and movement observed. Methods Volunteer orthoptists and subjects were filmed during near and distance VA testing, with the amount of movement determined from the recording. Controlling for movement using chin rests and chart stands, VA was retested. Actual changes in VA due to a change in subject or chart movement were compared with theoretical predictions. Results Fifty-one subjects (18-73 years) were assessed. Median (interquartile) movements of 0.06m (0.07) towards and 0.11m (0.08) away from the chart were measured (maximum 0.17m towards and 0.24m away). Significant differences in VA score were measured when movement was restricted, at near and distance (P < 0.05). VA score change agreed with predicted values in 67% of the cases, however, reduced test distance during near vision testing resulted in a degradation of VA, opposite to the improvement expected. Conclusion There were significant variations in subject/ chart separation during testing, which could have affected VA values. While this movement is associated with a change in VA, additional factors to movement appear to influence the score achieved during near testing. Procedures to minimise variation, by eliminating movement of test chart or subject, will improve VA test accuracy.
引用
收藏
页码:129 / 135
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] STANDARDIZATION FOR TESTING ACUITY OF INTERMEDIATE VISION - CONCLUSION BY SYMPOSIUM
    KABAYAMA, H
    NARASAKI, S
    OSHIMA, S
    SUZUMURA, A
    YAMAJI, R
    FOLIA OPHTHALMOLOGICA JAPONICA, 1974, 25 (08): : 769 - 770
  • [42] A pilot trial for visual acuity testing using a random method visual acuity application
    Kim, Jae-Hyung
    Hyun, Sang Yoon
    Chae, Ju Byung
    Rhiu, Soolienah
    Lee, Hye Jin
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2015, 56 (07)
  • [43] An improved method of testing distant vision acuity in schools
    Elkington, JSC
    LANCET, 1908, 2 : 837 - 837
  • [44] COMPUTER AUTOMATED VISUAL-ACUITY TESTING FOR VISUAL SCREENING
    WONG, D
    PLUMB, A
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE OPHTHALMOLOGICAL SOCIETIES OF THE UNITED KINGDOM, 1986, 105 : 498 - 503
  • [45] Repeatability of visual acuity testing using a psychometric function
    Tomoki Tokutake
    Tomofusa Yamauchi
    Norihiro Mita
    Ken-ichiro Kawamoto
    Hitoshi Tabuchi
    Kazutaka Kani
    Heihachiro Hara
    Akio Tabuchi
    Hiroshi Sasaki
    Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology, 2014, 58 : 381 - 387
  • [46] Visual Acuity Testing for Telehealth Using Mobile Applications
    Steren, Benjamin J.
    Young, Benjamin
    Chow, Jessica
    JAMA OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2021, 139 (03) : 344 - 347
  • [47] Visual acuity testing. From the laboratory to the clinic
    Bailey, Ian L.
    Lovie-Kitchin, Jan E.
    VISION RESEARCH, 2013, 90 : 2 - 9
  • [48] Effectiveness of a smartphone application for testing near visual acuity
    Tofigh, S.
    Shortridge, E.
    Elkeeb, A.
    Godley, B. F.
    EYE, 2015, 29 (11) : 1464 - 1468
  • [49] Effectiveness of a smartphone application for testing near visual acuity
    S Tofigh
    E Shortridge
    A Elkeeb
    B F Godley
    Eye, 2015, 29 : 1464 - 1468
  • [50] Web-based visual acuity testing for children
    Birch, Eileen E.
    Hudgins, Lindsey A.
    Jost, Reed M.
    Cheng-Patel, Christina S.
    Morale, Sarah E.
    Kelly, Krista R.
    JOURNAL OF AAPOS, 2022, 26 (02): : 61.e1 - 61.e5