Feasibility of Classification of Triple Negative Breast Cancer by Immunohistochemical Surrogate Markers

被引:41
|
作者
Kim, Sewha [1 ]
Moon, Byung-In [2 ]
Lim, Woosung [2 ]
Park, Sanghui [3 ]
Cho, Min Sun [3 ]
Sung, Sun Hee [3 ]
机构
[1] CHA Univ, Dept Pathol, CHA Bundang Med Ctr, Seongnam Si, Gyeonggi Do, South Korea
[2] Ewha Womans Univ, Dept Surg, Sch Med, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Ewha Womans Univ, Dept Pathol, Sch Med, 1071 Anyangcheon Ro, Seoul 07985, South Korea
关键词
Basal-like immune-activated; Basal-like immune-suppressed; Immunohistochemistry; Molecular subtype; Triple negative breast carcinoma; ANDROGEN RECEPTOR; EXPRESSION; IDENTIFICATION; TUMORS; BASAL; SUBTYPES;
D O I
10.1016/j.clbc.2018.03.012
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Using the 7 immunohistochemical surrogate markers, we tried to classify 200 TNBCs into 4 molecular subtypes; luminal androgen receptor, mesenchymal, basal-like immune-activated, and basal-like immune-suppressive types. Our results showed that each subtype had significant differences in clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis. Introduction: Recently, Burstein et al identified 4 stable molecular subtypes of triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) by mRNA profiling: luminal androgen receptor (LAR), mesenchymal (MES), basal-like immune-activated (BLIA), and basallike immune-suppressive (BLIS) types. The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility of immunohistochemistry (IHC) surrogate panel in classifying the TNBC molecular subtypes using a large cohort of TNBC retrieved from a single institution. Materials and Methods: IHC for androgen receptor [AR], claudin-3, E-cadherin, cytokeratin 5/6 [CK5/6], epidermal growth factor receptor [EGFR], indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 [IDO1], and Forkhead box C1 [FOXC1] were performed using the tissue microarray constructed from 200 TNBC samples. Results: The 200 TNBCs were classified as LAR (AR(+), n = 22; 11.0%), MES (claudin 3(-) and/or E-cadherin(-), n = 23; 11.5%), basal-like (CK5/6(+) and/or EGFR(+), n = 85; 42.5%), mixed (n = 60; 30%), and unclassifiable type (n = 10; 5%). LAR type was associated with older patient age, apocrine histologic features, low density of stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL), and low Ki-67 labeling index. MES type was associated with tumor cell discohesiveness and metaplastic features. Basal-like type was associated with younger patient age, high histologic grade, high stromal TIL density, and high Ki-67 labeling index. Basal-like TNBCs were further classified as BLIA (IDO1(+) and FOXC1(+), n = 27) or BLIS type (IDO1-and FOXC1(+), n = 11). BLIS type was associated with large tumor size and low stromal TIL density, which had the worst prognostic outcome among 4 subtypes. Conclusion: The IHC surrogate panel may define TNBC subtypes with distinct clinicopathologic characteristics and prognostic significance.
引用
收藏
页码:E1123 / E1132
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Expression of 'Tissue Specific' IHC Markers in Triple Negative Breast Cancer
    Han, Rachel
    Nofech-Mozes, Sharon
    Lu, Fang-I
    Plotkin, Anna
    Hanna, Wedad
    Slodkowska, Elzbieta
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2021, 34 (SUPPL 2) : 107 - 108
  • [42] Novel prognostic markers for patients with triple-negative breast cancer
    Zhou, Ling
    Li, Ke
    Luo, Yanli
    Tian, Ling
    Wang, Min
    Li, Chuanyuan
    Huang, Qian
    HUMAN PATHOLOGY, 2013, 44 (10) : 2180 - 2187
  • [43] Expression of 'Tissue Specific' IHC Markers in Triple Negative Breast Cancer
    Han, Rachel
    Nofech-Mozes, Sharon
    Lu, Fang-I
    Plotkin, Anna
    Hanna, Wedad
    Slodkowska, Elzbieta
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2021, 101 (SUPPL 1) : 107 - 108
  • [44] Candidate markers of homologous recombination deficiency for triple negative breast cancer
    Havrysh, K. V.
    Mukhametshina, G.
    Petrov, S.
    Safina, S.
    Kiyamova, R.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2018, 29
  • [45] Prognostic Value of Multiple Triple-Negative Markers in Breast Cancer
    Lu, S.
    Walter, O.
    Vohra, P.
    Kandil, D.
    Wang, L. J.
    Mercurio, A. M.
    Khan, A.
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2010, 23 : 60A - 61A
  • [46] Prognostic Value of Multiple Triple-Negative Markers in Breast Cancer
    Lu, S.
    Walter, O.
    Vohra, P.
    Kandil, D.
    Wang, L. J.
    Mercurio, A. M.
    Khan, A.
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2010, 90 : 60A - 61A
  • [47] Clinical significance of immunohistochemical androgen receptor expression in triple negative breast cancer
    Sakata, E.
    Makino, A.
    Miyahira, H.
    Endo, Y.
    Shibuya, H.
    Hashidate, H.
    Mitsuma, H.
    Mio, K.
    BREAST, 2017, 32 : S45 - S46
  • [48] HETEROGENEITY OF TRIPLE NEGATIVE BREAST CANCER OCCURRING IN YOUNG WOMEN: AN IMMUNOHISTOCHEMICAL ANALYSIS
    Tsvetkova, Vassilena
    Miglietta, Federica
    Griguolo, Gaia
    Guarneri, Valentina
    Lo Mele, Marcello
    Orvieto, Enrico
    Dieci, Maria Vittoria
    BREAST, 2018, 41 : S19 - S19
  • [49] Biology of the Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Immunohistochemical, RNA, and DNA Features
    Herrera Juarez, Mercedes
    Tolosa Ortega, Pablo
    Sanchez de Torre, Ana
    Ciruelos Gil, Eva
    BREAST CARE, 2020, 15 (03) : 208 - 216
  • [50] Triple-negative breast cancer: Histological subtypes and immunohistochemical and clinicopathological features
    Ishikawa, Yuko
    Horiguchi, Jun
    Toya, Hiroyuki
    Nakajima, Hiroki
    Hayashi, Mitsuhiro
    Tagaya, Nobumi
    Takeyoshi, Izumi
    Oyama, Tetsunari
    CANCER SCIENCE, 2011, 102 (03) : 656 - 662