Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for the Purposes of Groundwater Control System Design

被引:8
|
作者
Bajic, D. [1 ]
Polomcic, D. [1 ]
Ratkovic, J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Belgrade, Fac Min & Geol, Dept Hydrogeol, Belgrade, Serbia
关键词
Groundwater management; Hydrodynamic model; Multi-criteria decision-making; Expert judgment; Linguistic variables; Fuzzy optimization; Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process; MULTIOBJECTIVE FUZZY OPTIMIZATION; EXTENT ANALYSIS METHOD; WATER; CRITERIA; RANKING; ALTERNATIVES; SELECTION; NUMBERS; SEARCH; MINE;
D O I
10.1007/s11269-017-1777-4
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The best way for an engineer or scientist to express their knowledge, experience and opinions is day-to-day verbal communication. When a decision needs to be made about an optimal groundwater control system, the decision-making criteria need not always be numerical values. If fuzzy logic is used in multi-criteria decision-making, the criteria are described by linguistic variables that can be represented through fuzzy membership and expert judgment is used to describe such a system. Prior hydrodynamic modeling of the aquifer regime defines the management scenarios for groundwater control and provides an indication of their effectiveness. In this paper, the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process is applied to deal with a trending decision problem such as the selection of the optimal groundwater management system. Linguistic variables are used to evaluate all the criteria and sub-criteria that influence the final decision and the numerical weights of each alternative are determined by mathematical calculations. The paper presents a part of the algorithm - fuzzy optimization in hydrodynamic analysis, which leads to the selection of the optimal groundwater control system. The proposed method is applied in a real case study of an open-cast mine.
引用
收藏
页码:4759 / 4784
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Decerns: A Framework for Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis
    Boris Yatsalo
    Vladimir Didenko
    Sergey Gritsyuk
    Terry Sullivan
    International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 2015, 8 : 467 - 489
  • [22] Stakeholder involvement in Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis
    Praveen Thokala
    Guruprasad Madhavan
    Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, 16
  • [23] Modeling uncertainty in multi-criteria decision analysis
    Durbach, Ian N.
    Stewart, Theodor J.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2012, 223 (01) : 1 - 14
  • [24] Modeling the context in Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis
    Labreuche, Christophe
    NEW DIMENSIONS IN FUZZY LOGIC AND RELATED TECHNOLOGIES, VOL II, PROCEEDINGS, 2007, : 303 - 310
  • [25] Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Methods Comparison
    Zlaugotne, Beate
    Zihare, Lauma
    Balode, Lauma
    Kalnbalkite, Antra
    Khabdullin, Aset
    Blumberga, Dagnija
    ENVIRONMENTAL AND CLIMATE TECHNOLOGIES, 2020, 24 (01) : 454 - 471
  • [26] Decerns: A Framework for Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis
    Yatsalo, Boris
    Didenko, Vladimir
    Gritsyuk, Sergey
    Sullivan, Terry
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS, 2015, 8 (03) : 467 - 489
  • [27] Stakeholder involvement in Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis
    Thokala, Praveen
    Madhavan, Guruprasad
    COST EFFECTIVENESS AND RESOURCE ALLOCATION, 2018, 16
  • [28] Biases and Debiasing in Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis
    Montibeller, Gilberto
    von Winterfeldt, Detlof
    2015 48TH HAWAII INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEM SCIENCES (HICSS), 2015, : 1218 - 1226
  • [29] Multi-Criteria Fuzzy-Stochastic Diffusion Model of Groundwater Control System Selection
    Polomcic, Dusan
    Gligoric, Zoran
    Bajic, Dragoljub
    Gligoric, Milos
    Negovanovic, Milanka
    SYMMETRY-BASEL, 2019, 11 (05):
  • [30] Design synthesis using adaptive search techniques and multi-criteria decision analysis
    Nicholson, M
    Prasad, D
    SECOND IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENGINEERING OF COMPLEX COMPUTER SYSTEMS: HELD JOINTLY WITH 6TH CSESAW, 4TH IEEE RTAW, AND SES'96, 1996, : 522 - 525