A Case Study on Pixel-by-pixel Radiometric Normalization between Sentinel-2A and Landsat-8 OLI

被引:0
|
作者
Xu, Yuwen [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Hao [2 ]
Chen, Zhengchao [2 ]
Jing, Haitao [1 ]
机构
[1] Henan Polytech Univ, Sch Surveying & Land Informat Engn, Jiaozuo 454003, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Remote Sensing & Digital Earth, 9 Dengzhuang South Rd, Beijing 100094, Peoples R China
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Multi-source medium-to-high resolution remote sensing data differs in their spectral specifications and imaging process. To efficiently use the multi-source data and minimize the surface reflectance retrieval inconsistency from different sensors, it is a key step to apply the radiometric normalization before synthesizing these different datasets with similar spectral bands. Many traditional methods, such as pseudo invariant feature normalization (PIF), time invariant cluster (TIC), automatic scattergram-controlled regression (ASCR) and so on, usually determine the corresponding conversion coefficients of each similar band from different images mainly through the entire image statistics, without considering the different characterizations behaving in variety of the ground covers, so the conversion coefficients are the same for all pixels in a whole band. Unlikely, this paper compensated the differences of variety of ground covers, on the basis of the iteratively re-weighted multiple change detection transform (IR-MAD), proposed a pixel-by-pixel radiometric normalization method. According to matching model and transformation model between the multispectral image pixel spectral and the ground spectral library, the spectral response adjustment matching factor was used to complete the radiometric normalization of the image pairs As a case study, this method was applied to similar bands (visible-near infrared, VNIR) of Sentinel-2A (S2A) and Landsat-8 OLI (L8) data, acquired over quasi-simultaneously in Xianghe County, Hebei Province, on September 12, 2017. Compared with using traditional method IR-MAD alone, the method in this paper could effectively minimize the differences among the medium-to-high resolution surface reflectance images Before processing, the mean and standard deviation of reflectance image of the S2A in the VNIR bands was 0.0763 +/- 0.0518, 0.0891 +/- 0.0481, 0.0861 +/- 0.0609, 0.2955 +/- 0.0693. While the L8 was 0.0530 +/- 0.0361, 0.0752 +/- 0.0371, 0.0757 +/- 0.0482, 0.2711 +/- 0.0645, all lower than S2A. After the normalization, the corresponding statistical value of S2A normalized image dropped to the value which was 0.0556 +/- 0.0375, 0.0758 +/- 0.0370, 0.0741 +/- 0.0419, 0.2713 +/- 0.0610. But the result of only using IR-MAD was 0.0589 +/- 0.0390, 0.0774 +/- 0.0367, 0.0763 0.0463, 0.2719 +/- 0.0602. It indicates that the method proposed from us could achieve a more satisfactory normalization effect Next step in our research, we will further verify and improve this method for more images.
引用
收藏
页码:1188 / 1193
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Preliminary tests and results concerning integration of sentinel-2 and Landsat-8 OLI for crop monitoring
    Lessio A.
    Fissore V.
    Borgogno-Mondino E.
    Journal of Imaging, 2017, 3 (04)
  • [32] A Global Analysis of Sentinel-2A, Sentinel-2B and Landsat-8 Data Revisit Intervals and Implications for Terrestrial Monitoring
    Li, Jian
    Roy, David P.
    REMOTE SENSING, 2017, 9 (09):
  • [33] Fracture network mapping using Landsat-8 OLI, Sentinel-2A, ASTER, and ASTER-GDEM data, in the Rich area (Central High Atlas, Morocco)
    Ibtissame Bentahar
    Mohammed Raji
    Hicham Si Mhamdi
    Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2020, 13
  • [34] Fracture network mapping using Landsat-8 OLI, Sentinel-2A, ASTER, and ASTER-GDEM data, in the Rich area (Central High Atlas, Morocco)
    Bentahar, Ibtissame
    Raji, Mohammed
    Mhamdi, Hicham Si
    ARABIAN JOURNAL OF GEOSCIENCES, 2020, 13 (16)
  • [35] Assessment of Workflow Feature Selection on Forest LAI Prediction with Sentinel-2A MSI, Landsat 7 ETM+ and Landsat 8 OLI
    Brede, Benjamin
    Verrelst, Jochem
    Gastellu-Etchegorry, Jean-Philippe
    Clevers, Jan G. P. W.
    Goudzwaard, Leo
    den Ouden, Jan
    Verbesselt, Jan
    Herold, Martin
    REMOTE SENSING, 2020, 12 (06)
  • [36] Accuracies of support vector machine and random forest in rice mapping with Sentinel-1A, Landsat-8 and Sentinel-2A datasets
    Mansaray, Lamin R.
    Wang, Fumin
    Huang, Jingfeng
    Yang, Lingbo
    Kanu, Adam Sheka
    GEOCARTO INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 35 (10) : 1088 - 1108
  • [37] Optimal Solar Zenith Angle Definition for Combined Landsat-8 and Sentinel-2A/2B Data Angular Normalization Using Machine Learning Methods
    Li, Jian
    Chen, Baozhang
    REMOTE SENSING, 2021, 13 (13)
  • [38] Empirical cross sensor comparison of Sentinel-2A and 2B MSI, Landsat-8 OLI, and Landsat-7 ETM + top of atmosphere spectral characteristics over the conterminous United States
    Chastain, Robert
    Housman, Ian
    Goldstein, Joshua
    Finco, Mark
    Tenneson, Karis
    REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 221 : 274 - 285
  • [39] Evaluation of Landsat-8 OLI and Sentinel-2 MSI images for estimating the ecological quality of port waters
    Pieri, Maurizio
    Massi, Luca
    Nuccio, Caterina
    Lazzara, Luigi
    Scapini, Felicita
    Rossano, Claudia
    Maselli, Fabio
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2021, 54 (01) : 281 - 295
  • [40] Harmonizing Landsat-8 OLI and Sentinel-2 MSI: an assessment of surface reflectance and vegetation index consistency
    Zhang, Jiaqi
    Zhou, Xiaocheng
    Liu, Xueping
    Wang, Xiaoqin
    He, Guojin
    Zhang, Youshui
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DIGITAL EARTH, 2025, 18 (01)