A Comparative Analysis of Metal Shielding for Mammography Using Monte Carlo Simulation

被引:0
|
作者
Kim, Jang Oh [1 ,4 ]
Kwon, Da-Eun [2 ]
Han, Dong-Hee [2 ]
Jung, Kyung-Hwan [2 ]
Min, Byung In [3 ]
Baek, Cheol Ha [2 ,4 ]
Lee, Chang-Lae [5 ]
机构
[1] Kangwon Natl Univ, Hlth & Med Educ Res Inst, 346 Jungang Ro, Samcheok Si 25949, Gangwon Do, South Korea
[2] Kangwon Natl Univ, Grad Sch, Dept Hlth Med Sci, 346 Jungang Ro, Samcheok Si 25949, Gangwon Do, South Korea
[3] Inje Univ, Dept Nucl Appl Engn, 197 Inje Ro, Gimhae Si 50834, Gyeongsangnam D, South Korea
[4] Kangwon Natl Univ, Dept Radiol Sci, 346 Jungang Ro, Samcheok Si 25949, Gangwon Do, South Korea
[5] Yonsei Univ, Dept Radiol Sci, 1 Yonseidae Gil, Wonju 26493, Gangwon Do, South Korea
关键词
mammography; Monte Carlo simulation; shielding rate; lead; bismuth; tungsten;
D O I
10.4283/JMAG.2021.26.4.463
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
As the incidence of breast cancer increases, concerns about unnecessary exposure to radiation during mammography are increasing. This study quantitatively evaluated the thickness and weight showing 95 % shielding ability of silicon, lead, bismuth, and tungsten with a tube voltage of 30 kVp and a distance between the X-ray tube and shield of 100 cm using Geant4 Application for Tomographic Emission (GATE). The absorbed dose to the breast was derived when the optimal shield derived from GATE was used using Monte Carlo N-Particle code. The optimal thickness was in the order of tungsten, lead, bismuth, and silicon, and the total weight was found in the order of bismuth, lead, tungsten, and silicon. There was no difference in the absorbed dose to the breast depending on the material. When considering the thickness and weight of the shield, lead appears to be the best material. Lead can be an optimal shield with reduced thickness and weight if it is wrapped with a minimum amount of silicon.
引用
收藏
页码:463 / 466
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Digital mammography image simulation using Monte Carlo
    Peplow, DE
    Verghese, K
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2000, 27 (03) : 568 - 579
  • [2] Dosimetry in contact and magnification mammography, using Monte Carlo simulation
    Koutalonis, M.
    Delis, H.
    Spyrou, G.
    Costaridou, L.
    Tzanakos, G.
    Panayiotakis, G.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 15TH IASTED INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON APPLIED SIMULATION AND MODELLING, 2006, : 389 - +
  • [3] Shielding Analysis of Metal Hydride-based Materials for Both Neutron and Gamma Rays Using Monte Carlo Simulation
    Kwak, Jeongkwon
    Muth, Boravy
    Yang, Hyeon-Woo
    Park, Chang Je
    Kang, Woo Seung
    Kim, Sun-Jae
    [J]. KOREAN JOURNAL OF METALS AND MATERIALS, 2021, 59 (12): : 921 - 925
  • [4] Performance and feasibility evaluation for radiation shielding of metal oxides: Monte Carlo simulation
    Da-Eun Kwon
    Dong-Hee Han
    Kyung-Hwan Jung
    Seung-Jae Lee
    Jang-Oh Kim
    Cheol-Ha Baek
    [J]. Journal of the Korean Physical Society, 2023, 82 : 813 - 817
  • [5] Performance and feasibility evaluation for radiation shielding of metal oxides: Monte Carlo simulation
    Kwon, Da-Eun
    Han, Dong-Hee
    Jung, Kyung-Hwan
    Lee, Seung-Jae
    Kim, Jang-Oh
    Baek, Cheol-Ha
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY, 2023, 82 (08) : 813 - 817
  • [6] MONTE CARLO SIMULATION OF ACCELERATOR ROOM SHIELDING
    Tarnavski, N.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2008, 88 : S411 - S411
  • [7] Effect of thyroid shielding during mammography: measurements on phantom and patient as well as estimation with Monte Carlo simulation
    Pyka M.
    Eschle P.
    Sommer C.
    Weyland M.S.
    Kubik R.
    Scheidegger S.
    [J]. European Radiology Experimental, 2 (1)
  • [8] A Monte Carlo simulation of x-ray mammography
    Spyrou, G
    Panayiotakis, G
    Tzanakos, G
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 18TH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY, VOL 18, PTS 1-5, 1997, 18 : 842 - 843
  • [9] Optimization of digital subtraction mammography using Monte Carlo simulation of the imaging chain
    Ullman, G
    Sandborg, M
    Dance, DR
    Yaffe, M
    Skarpathiotakis, M
    Carlsson, GA
    [J]. DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY, PROCEEDINGS, 2003, : 152 - 154
  • [10] Comparative Monte Carlo efficiency by Monte Carlo analysis
    Rubenstein, B. M.
    Gubernatis, J. E.
    Doll, J. D.
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2010, 82 (03):