The Influence of Hard- and Software Improvement of Intraoral Scanners on the Implant Transfer Accuracy from 2012 to 2021: An In Vitro Study

被引:10
|
作者
Schmidt, Alexander [1 ]
Schlenz, Maximiliane Amelie [1 ]
Liu, Haoyu [1 ]
Kaempe, Holger Sebastian [2 ]
Woestmann, Bernd [1 ]
机构
[1] Justus Liebig Univ, Dent Clin, Dept Prosthodont, Schlangenzahl 14, D-35392 Giessen, Germany
[2] Dent Practice, Rommelstr 1, D-35708 Haiger, Germany
来源
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL | 2021年 / 11卷 / 15期
关键词
dental implants; digital dentistry; dental impression technique; dimensional measurement accuracy; intraoral scanner; IMPRESSION TECHNIQUES; DIGITAL IMPRESSIONS; PRECISION; POSITION; BODIES;
D O I
10.3390/app11157166
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
This study aimed to investigate the transfer accuracy (trueness and precision) of three different intraoral scanning families using different hardware and software versions over the last decade from 2012 to 2021, compared to a conventional impression. Therefore, an implant master model with a reference cube was digitized and served as a reference dataset. Digital impressions of all three scanning families (True definition, TRIOS, CEREC) were recorded (n = 10 per group), and conventional implant impressions were taken (n = 10). The conventional models were digitized, and all models (conventional and digital) were measured. Therefore, it was possible to obtain the deviations between the master model and the scans or conventional models in terms of absolute three-dimensional (3D) deviations, deviations in rotation, and angulation. The results for deviations between the older and newer scanning systems were analyzed using pairwise comparisons (p < 0.05; SPSS 26). The absolute 3D deviations increased with increasing scan path length, particularly for the older hardware and software versions (old vs. new (MW +/- SD) True Definition: 355 +/- 62 mu m vs. 483 +/- 110 mu m; TRIOS: 574 +/- 274 mu m vs. 258 +/- 100 mu m; and CEREC: 1356 +/- 1023 mu m vs. 110 +/- 49 mu m). This was also true for deviations in rotation and angulation. The conventional impression showed an advantage only regarding the absolute 3D deviation compared to the older systems. Based on the data of the present study, the accuracy of intraoral scanners is decisively related to hardware and software; though, newer systems or software do not necessarily warrant improvement. Nevertheless, to achieve high transfer accuracy, regular updating of digital systems is recommended. The challenge of increasing errors with increasing scan paths is overcome in the most recent systems. The combination of two different scanning principles in a single device seems to be beneficial.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] Influence of Liquid on the Tooth Surface on the Accuracy of Intraoral Scanners: An In Vitro Study
    Chen, Yuming
    Zhai, Zhihao
    Li, Hefei
    Yamada, Shuhei
    Matsuoka, Takashi
    Ono, Shinji
    Nakano, Tamaki
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY, 2022, 31 (01): : 59 - 64
  • [2] Accuracy evaluation of two different intraoral scanners in implant prosthodontics. A comparative in vitro study
    Verniani, G.
    Casucci, A.
    Nosrati, N.
    D'Arienzo, L. F.
    Val, M.
    Cagidiaco, E. Ferrari
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OSSEOINTEGRATION, 2024, 16 (01) : 61 - 64
  • [3] Influence of intraoral scanning coverage on the accuracy of digital implant impressions - An in vitro study
    Wang, Zhen-yu
    Gong, Yu
    Liu, Fei
    Chen, Du
    Shen, Jie-fei
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2024, 143
  • [4] Influence of Different Material Substrates on the Accuracy of Three Intraoral Scanners: A Single-Blinded In Vitro Study
    Michelinakis, George
    Apostolakis, Dimitrios
    Tsagarakis, Andreas
    Lampropoulos, Panagiotis
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS, 2022, 35 (01) : 82 - 93
  • [5] Investigation of the Accuracy of Four Intraoral Scanners in Mandibular Full-Arch Digital Implant Impression: A Comparative In Vitro Study
    Di Fiore, Adolfo
    Graiff, Lorenzo
    Savio, Gianpaolo
    Granata, Stefano
    Basilicata, Michele
    Bollero, Patrizio
    Meneghello, Roberto
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (08)
  • [6] Investigation of the effects of arch size and implant angulation on the accuracy of digital impression using two intraoral scanners: An in vitro study
    Geramipanah, Farideh
    Sadighpour, Leyla
    Payaminia, Leila
    [J]. CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL DENTAL RESEARCH, 2023, 9 (06): : 983 - 992
  • [7] Influence of the implant scan body bevel location, implant angulation and position on intraoral scanning accuracy: An in vitro study
    Gomez-Polo, Miguel
    Alvarez, Francisco
    Ortega, Rocio
    Gomez-Polo, Cristina
    Barmak, Abdul B.
    Kois, John C.
    Revilla-Leon, Marta
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2022, 121
  • [8] Accuracy of single implant scans with a combined healing abutment-scan body system and different intraoral scanners: An in vitro study
    Cakmak, Gulce
    Donmez, Mustafa Borga
    Atalay, Sevda
    Yilmaz, Hakan
    Kokat, Ali Murat
    Yilmaz, Burak
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2021, 113
  • [9] Comparison of Different Intraoral Scanners With Prefabricated Aid on Accuracy and Framework Passive Fit of Digital Complete-Arch Implant Impression: An In Vitro Study
    Fu, Xiao-Jiao
    Liu, Min
    Shi, Jun-Yu
    Deng, Ke
    Lai, Hong-Chang
    Gu, Wen
    Zhang, Xiao-Meng
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2024,
  • [10] Influence of Scanning-Aid Materials on the Accuracy and Time Efficiency of Intraoral Scanners for Full-Arch Digital Scanning: An In Vitro Study
    Oh, Hyun-Su
    Lim, Young-Jun
    Kim, Bongju
    Kim, Myung-Joo
    Kwon, Ho-Beom
    Baek, Yeon-Wha
    [J]. MATERIALS, 2021, 14 (09)