Accuracy and Interobserver Variability in Reporting of PI-RADS Version 2

被引：9
|
作者：
Flood, Thomas F. [1 ]
Pokharel, Sajal S. [1 ]
Patel, Nayana U. [1 ]
Clark, Toshimasa J. [1 ]
机构：
[1] Univ Colorado Denver, Dept Radiol, Anschutz Med Campus, Aurora, CO USA
来源：
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY | 2017年 / 14卷 / 09期
关键词：
s; PROSTATE-CANCER; DATA SYSTEM;
D O I：
10.1016/j.jacr.2017.04.012
中图分类号：
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号：
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要：
[No abstract available]
引用
收藏
页码：1202 / 1205
页数：4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Performance of PI-RADS version 1 versus version 2 regarding the relation with histopathological results
    Auer, Thomas
    Edlinger, Michael
    Bektic, Jasmin
    Nagele, Udo
    Herrmann, Thomas
    Schaefer, Georg
    Aigner, Friedrich
    Junker, Daniel
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 35 (05) : 687 - 693
  • [32] Commentary regarding the inter-reader reproducibility of PI-RADS version 2
    Andrew B. Rosenkrantz
    Daniel J. Margolis
    Abdominal Radiology, 2016, 41 : 907 - 909
  • [33] Organized Chaos: Does PI-RADS Version 2 Work in the Transition Zone?
    Weinreb, Jeffrey C.
    RADIOLOGY, 2018, 288 (02) : 492 - 494
  • [34] URO - PI-RADS version 2.1 proves its worth
    Krome, Susanne
    ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 2025, 197 (02): : 131 - 131
  • [35] Correlation between Intraprostatic PSMA Uptake and MRI PI-RADS of [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI in Patients with Prostate Cancer: Comparison of PI-RADS Version 2.0 and PI-RADS Version 2.1
    Zhao, Jing
    Mangarova, Dilyana B.
    Brangsch, Julia
    Kader, Avan
    Hamm, Bernd
    Brenner, Winfried
    Makowski, Marcus R.
    CANCERS, 2020, 12 (12) : 1 - 13
  • [36] Comparison of the PI-RADS 2.1 scoring system to PI-RADS 2.0: Impact on diagnostic accuracy and inter-reader agreement
    Hotker, Andreas M.
    Bluthgen, Christian
    Rupp, Niels J.
    Schneider, Aurelia F.
    Eberli, Daniel
    Donati, Olivio F.
    PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (10):
  • [37] Accuracy of prostate imaging reporting and data system (PI-RADS v2) in the detection of prostate cancer (PCa).
    Gill, David Michael
    Bishoff, Jay
    Lynch, Steven C.
    Foy, Bridget
    Evans, Jaden D.
    Haslem, Derrick S.
    Yeatman, Timothy Joseph
    McLean, Logan
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 38 (15)
  • [38] Interobserver Agreement of PI-RADS v. 2: Not All Features or Observers Are Created Equal
    Schieda, Nicola
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2020, 51 (02) : 605 - 606
  • [39] Implications of PI-RADS Version 1 and Updated Version 2 on the Scoring of Prostatic Lesions in Multiparametric MRI
    Haas, M.
    Guenzel, K.
    Penzkofer, T.
    Maxeiner, A.
    Fischer, T.
    Miller, K.
    Hamm, B.
    Asbach, P.
    Cash, H.
    AKTUELLE UROLOGIE, 2016, 47 (05) : 383 - 387
  • [40] Direct comparison of PI-RADS version 2 and version 1 regarding interreader agreement and diagnostic accuracy for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer
    Becker, Anton S.
    Cornelius, Alexander
    Reiner, Cacilia S.
    Stocker, Daniel
    Ulbrich, Erika J.
    Barth, Borna K.
    Mortezavi, Ashkan
    Eberli, Daniel
    Donati, Olivio F.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2017, 94 : 58 - 63
12345