Public Support for Cigarette Pack Pictorial Health Warnings Among US Adults: A Cross-sectional Analysis of the 2020 Health Information National Trends Survey

被引:4
|
作者
Kaufman, Annette R. [1 ]
D'Angelo, Heather [2 ]
Gaysynsky, Anna [2 ,3 ]
Seidenberg, Andrew B. [4 ]
Vollinger, Robert E., Jr. [5 ]
Blake, Kelly D. [2 ]
机构
[1] NCI, Tobacco Control Res Branch, Behav Res Program, Div Canc Control & Populat Sci, 9609 Med Ctr Dr, Rockville, MD 20850 USA
[2] NCI, Hlth Commun & Informat Res Branch, Behav Res Program, Div Canc Control & Populat Sci, Rockville, MD USA
[3] ICF, ICF Next Govt, Rockville, MD USA
[4] NCI, Behav Res Program, Div Canc Control & Populat Sci, Rockville, MD USA
[5] Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Policy Planning & Coordinat Unit, Off Smoking & Hlth, Natl Ctr Chron Dis Prevent & Hlth Promot, Washington, DC USA
关键词
LABELS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1093/ntr/ntab263
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction The US Food and Drug Administration issued a final rule requiring new warnings for cigarette packages and advertisements. This study examines population-level characteristics of support for-versus neutrality or opposition toward-cigarette pack warnings that use text and images to portray the negative health effects of smoking. Methods We used nationally representative cross-sectional data of US adults age 18 and older from the 2020 Health Information National Trends Survey (n = 3865). Frequencies and weighted proportions were calculated for neutrality toward, opposition to, and support for pictorial warnings across sociodemographics and other predictors. Weighted, multivariable logistic regression examined predictors of being neutral or opposed versus supportive of pictorial warnings. Results In 2020, an estimated 69.9% of US adults supported pictorial warnings, 9.1% opposed, and 20.9% neither supported nor opposed them. In fully adjusted models, current smokers had almost twice the odds of being neutral or opposed to pictorial warnings as never smokers (odds ratio [OR] = 1.99, confidence interval [CI] 1.12, 3.52). Adults 75 years and older (vs. 18-34) (OR = 0.55, CI 0.33, 0.94) and those with children under 18 in their household (vs. no children) (OR = 0.67, CI 0.46, 0.98) were less likely to be neutral or opposed. Conclusions In advance of the Food and Drug Administration's implementation of pictorial warnings on cigarette packages, nearly 70% of American adults support this policy. Disseminating information about the effectiveness of pictorial warnings may further strengthen support among current smokers who are less supportive than never smokers. Furthermore, framing messages around the benefits of pictorial warnings for protecting youth may increase public support. Implications While public support for pictorial warnings on cigarette packages is high in the United States, it may increase further after policy implementation and be strengthened by utilizing information campaigns that convey the evidence that pictorial warnings are an effective public health strategy.
引用
收藏
页码:924 / 928
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Disparities in Awareness of Hepatitis C Virus Among US Adults: An Analysis of the 2019 Health Information National Trends Survey
    Islam, Jessica Yasmine
    Spees, Lisa
    Camacho-Rivera, Marlene
    Vidot, Denise C.
    Yarosh, Rina
    Wheldon, Christopher W.
    [J]. SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASES, 2021, 48 (12) : 981 - 985
  • [22] Prostate-specific Antigen Testing in Men with Disabilities: A Cross-sectional Analysis of the Health Information National Trends Survey
    Leong, Joon Yau
    Pinkhasov, Ruben
    Chandrasekar, Thenappan
    Shapiro, Oleg
    Daneshvar, Michael
    Jacob, Joseph
    Sanford, Thomas
    Bratslavsky, Gennady
    Goldberg, Hanan
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 2022, 8 (05): : 1125 - 1132
  • [23] Perceptions of health warnings on cigarette sticks among the adult population in Al-Madinah, Saudi Arabia: A cross-sectional survey
    Al-Ahmadi, Ahmed F.
    Almatrafi, Mohammed A.
    Ali, Ahmed K.
    Alsaedi, Osama H.
    Al-Zalabani, Abdulmohsen H.
    [J]. TOBACCO INDUCED DISEASES, 2024, 22 : 1 - 11
  • [24] Disparities in Telehealth Offer and Use among US Adults: 2022 Health Information National Trends Survey
    Everson, Nicole Senft
    Jensen, Roxanne E.
    Vanderpool, Robin C.
    [J]. TELEMEDICINE AND E-HEALTH, 2024,
  • [25] Prevalence and correlates of cigarette smoking among Dulong adults in China: A cross-sectional survey in 2020
    Shao, Ying
    Zha, Shun
    Qin, Mingfang
    Zhu, Qiuyan
    Yang, Xiliang
    Yang, Cangjiang
    Wang, Xinlin
    Zhang, Yanli
    Yang, Weimei
    Zhou, Kunhua
    Li, Yanmei
    Tang, Xian
    Yu, Qiuli
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 10
  • [26] Age Differences in the Use of Health Information Technology Among Adults in the United States: An Analysis of the Health Information National Trends Survey
    Onyeaka, Henry K.
    Romero, Perla
    Healy, Brian C.
    Celano, Christopher M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGING AND HEALTH, 2021, 33 (1-2) : 147 - 154
  • [27] Smartphone Ownership Among US Adult Cigarette Smokers: 2014 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS) Data
    Heffner, Jaimee L.
    Mull, Kristin E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2017, 19 (08)
  • [28] HEALTH INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY USE AMONG ADULTS: ANALYSIS OF THE HEALTH INFORMATION NATIONAL TREND SURVEY
    Lee, E.
    Yeo, Y.
    LevKoff, S.
    [J]. GERONTOLOGIST, 2012, 52 : 563 - 563
  • [29] PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN TESTING IN THE DISABLED POPULATION: A CROSS-SECTIONAL ANALYSIS OF THE HEALTH INFORMATION NATIONAL TRENDS SURVEY (HINTS)
    Leong, Joon Yau
    Pinkhasov, Ruben
    Chandrasekar, Thenappan
    Shapiro, Oleg
    Daneshvar, Michael
    Sanford, Thomas
    Bratslavsky, Gennady
    Goldberg, Hanan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 206 : E1151 - E1151
  • [30] Prostate-specific antigen testing in the disabled population: A cross-sectional analysis of the Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS).
    Leong, Joon Yau
    Pinkhasov, Ruben
    Chandrasekar, Thenappan
    Shapiro, Oleg
    Daneshvar, Michael
    Sanford, Thomas
    Bratslavsky, Gennady
    Goldberg, Hanan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 39 (15)