Modification of safety critical systems: an assessment of three approaches

被引:0
|
作者
Stalhane, T [1 ]
Wedde, KJ [1 ]
机构
[1] SINTEF Telecom & Informat, N-7034 Trondheim, Norway
关键词
safety critical systems; fault tree analysis; failure mode effect analysis; code analysis;
D O I
10.1016/S0141-9331(98)00063-5
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
This paper sums up the experience at SINTEF Telecom and Informatics on analysis of safety critical systems. After a short description of the system under consideration, the paper naturally falls into two parts. The first one is a description of two modifications, how they were implemented and how they were analysed for safety. The second one contains a discussion of the three methods used-FTA, FMECA and code analysis. We here concentrate on how these methods differ in focus, the knowledge and information needed, and the types of problems they can handle. The paper's conclusion is that all three methods are needed when analysing the modifications of a safety critical system. The knowledge needed and the problem focus will, however, differ. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:611 / 619
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Auditing safety critical systems
    Reeve, A
    CONTROL AND INSTRUMENTATION, 1996, 28 (06): : 45 - 46
  • [32] SAFETY-CRITICAL SYSTEMS
    RUDALL, BH
    ROBOTICA, 1990, 8 : 184 - 184
  • [33] A Quantitative Safety Assessment Methodology for Safety-Critical Programmable Electronic Systems Using Fault Injection
    Reynolds, Michael A.
    Elks, Carl R.
    George, Nishant
    Sekhar, Meenakshi
    DeLong, Todd
    Johnson, Barry W.
    SAE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PASSENGER CARS-ELECTRONIC AND ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS, 2009, 2 (01): : 287 - 300
  • [34] Approaches to Selection of Combinatorial Algorithm for Optimization in Network Traffic Control of Safety-Critical Systems
    Kuchuk, Georgiy
    Kharchenko, Vyacheslav
    Kovalenko, Andriy
    Ruchkov, Eugen
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2016 IEEE EAST-WEST DESIGN & TEST SYMPOSIUM (EWDTS), 2016,
  • [35] Secure and safety-critical vs. insecure, non safety-critical embedded systems: Do they require completely different design approaches?
    Marwedel, P
    Gebotys, C
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HARDWARE/SOFTWARE CODESIGN AND SYSTEM SYNTHESIS, 2004, : 72 - 73
  • [36] The quantitative safety assessment for safety-critical software
    Yu, YY
    Johnson, BW
    29th Annual IEEE/NASA Software Engineering Workshop, Proceedings, 2005, : 150 - 159
  • [37] Systems Approaches in Risk Assessment
    Lesko, L. J.
    Zheng, S.
    Schmidt, S.
    CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2013, 93 (05) : 413 - 424
  • [38] Formal safety assessment: A critical review
    Laboratory for Maritime Transport, School of Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, Zografou, Greece
    Mar Technol, 2009, 1 (45-59):
  • [39] Assessment and certification of safety critical software
    El Koursi, EM
    Mariano, G
    ROBOTICS, AUTOMATION AND CONTROL AND MANUFACTURING: TRENDS, PRINCIPLES AND APPLICATIONS, 2002, 14 : 51 - 57
  • [40] Assessment Criteria for safety critical computer
    El koursi, EM
    Meganck, P
    1998 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS, MAN, AND CYBERNETICS, VOLS 1-5, 1998, : 3240 - 3245