A Nomogram to Predict for Malignant Diagnosis of BI-RADS Category 4 Breast Lesions

被引:8
|
作者
Mazouni, Chafika [1 ]
Sneige, Nour [2 ]
Rouzier, Roman [3 ]
Balleyguier, Corinne [4 ]
Bevers, Therese [5 ]
Andre, Fabrice [1 ]
Vielh, Philippe [1 ]
Delaloge, Suzette [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Gustave Roussy, Dept Breast Oncol, F-94805 Villejuif, France
[2] Hop Tenon, Dept Pathol, F-75970 Paris, France
[3] Hop Tenon, Dept Breast Oncol, F-75970 Paris, France
[4] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Radiol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[5] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Canc Prevent Ctr, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
breast cancer; BI-RADS; 4; fine-needle aspiration; mammography; nomogram; CANCER RISK; GAIL MODEL; WOMEN; CHEMOTHERAPY; MAMMOGRAPHY; CYTOLOGY; NETWORK;
D O I
10.1002/jso.21616
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background and Objective: BI-RADS Category classification is the most powerful predictor of breast cancer (BC). However, BI-RADS Category 4 lesions are associated with a highly variable rate of BC. The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a nomogram for the prediction of individual probability of BC in patients with BI-RADS Category 4 lesions. Methods: The study included all patients with BI-RADS Category 4 lesions at screening mammogram, who underwent diagnostic cytology or biopsy and, as needed, surgery or follow-up. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to develop the model and build the nomogram. This nomogram was evaluated on a training set of 170 patients treated at IGR Cancer Center, Paris, France. Nomogram performance was evaluated on an external independent dataset of 188 patients from MDA Cancer Center, Houston, Texas. Results: A total of 51(28.5%) patients in the training set and 73 (42.4%) patients in the validation set were diagnosed with BC. The final, most informative, nomogram included information on patient age (P = 0.04), palpable tumor (P = 0.002), menopausal status (P = 0.32), lesion size (P = 0.81), HRT (P = 0.09), and Gail risk (P = 0.58). The predictive accuracy of the nomogram was 0.716, respectively. The concordance index of the model was 0.66 in the validation set. Conclusion: The nomogram based on clinical and radiological findings may help inform the patients before surgical explorations, to decrease the number of missed cancer cases but currently cannot replace FNA or biopsy. J. Surg. Oncol. 2010;102:220-224. (C) 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:220 / 224
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Use of BI-RADS lesion descriptors in computer-aided diagnosis of malignant and benign breast lesions
    Jiang, YL
    Schmidt, RA
    Nishikawa, RM
    D'Orsi, CJ
    Vyborny, CJ
    Newstead, GM
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2004: IMAGE PERCEPTION, OBSERVER PERFORMANCE, AND TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, 2004, 5372 : 199 - 202
  • [22] Abnormal BI-RADS Breast Lesions in Gabon
    Ivanga, Mahine
    Koumakpayi, Ismael H.
    Engohan-Aloghe, Corinne
    Mipinda, Gaelle Ebinda
    Mboumba, Chermine
    Ankely, Junie Chansy K.
    Belembaogo, Ernest
    BREAST JOURNAL, 2017, 23 (05): : 615 - 616
  • [23] A nomogram for diagnosis of BI-RADS 4 breast nodules based on three-dimensional volume ultrasound
    Jiang, Xianping
    Chen, Chen
    Yao, Jincao
    Wang, Liping
    Yang, Chen
    Li, Wei
    Ou, Di
    Jin, Zhiyan
    Liu, Yuanzhen
    Peng, Chanjuan
    Wang, Yifan
    Xu, Dong
    BMC MEDICAL IMAGING, 2025, 25 (01):
  • [24] Can Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging Prevent Biopsy or Change the Management of BI-RADS® Category 4 Breast Lesions?
    Turnaoglu, Hale
    Ozturk, Emine
    Yucesoy, Cuneyt
    Teber, Mehmet Akif
    Turan, Aynur
    Ozbalci, Aysu Basak
    Seker, Ebru Gaye
    Onal, Binnur
    Hekimoglu, Baki
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2018, 80 (05) : 505 - 512
  • [25] The use of CAD analysis in BI-RADS category 3 lesions
    Buchbinder, SS
    Leichter, IS
    Lederman, R
    Novak, B
    Bamberger, P
    Fields, S
    RADIOLOGY, 2002, 225 : 602 - 602
  • [26] Can Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging Prevent Biopsy or Change the Management of BI-RADS® Category 4 Breast Lesions?
    Hale Turnaoglu
    Emine Ozturk
    Cuneyt Yucesoy
    Mehmet Akif Teber
    Aynur Turan
    Aysu Basak Ozbalci
    Ebru Gaye Seker
    Binnur Onal
    Baki Hekimoglu
    Indian Journal of Surgery, 2018, 80 : 505 - 512
  • [27] Detection and diagnosis of automated breast ultrasound in patients with BI-RADS category 4 microcalcifications: a retrospective study
    Yu, Li-Fang
    Dai, Chao-Chao
    Zhu, Luo-Xi
    Xu, Xiao-Jing
    Yan, Hong-Ju
    Jiang, Chen-Xiang
    Bao, Ling-Yun
    BMC MEDICAL IMAGING, 2024, 24 (01):
  • [28] Dedicated breast PET value to evaluate BI-RADS 4 breast lesions
    Grana-Lopez, L.
    Herranz, M.
    Dominguez-Prado, I
    Argibay, S.
    Villares, A.
    Ruibal, A.
    Vazquez-Caruncho, M.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2018, 108 : 201 - 207
  • [29] BI-RADS 4 breast lesions: could multi-mode ultrasound be helpful for their diagnosis?
    Liu, Gang
    Zhang, Meng-Ke
    He, Yan
    Liu, Yuan
    Li, Xi-Ru
    Wang, Zhi-Li
    GLAND SURGERY, 2019, 8 (03) : 258 - 270
  • [30] Malignancy in BI-RADS category 3 mammographic lesions - Response
    Rosen, EL
    RADIOLOGY, 2002, 225 (03) : 919 - 920