Better Estimation of Spontaneous Preterm Birth Prediction Performance through Improved Gestational Age Dating

被引:5
|
作者
Burchard, Julja [1 ]
Saade, George R. [2 ]
Boggess, Kim A. [3 ]
Markenson, Glenn R. [4 ]
Iams, Jay D. [5 ]
Coonrod, Dean V. [6 ]
Pereira, Leonardo M. [7 ]
Hoffman, Matthew K. [8 ]
Polpitiya, Ashoka D. [1 ]
Treacy, Ryan [1 ]
Fox, Angela C. [1 ]
Randolph, Todd L. [1 ]
Fleischer, Tracey C. [1 ]
Dufford, Max T. [1 ]
Garite, Thomas J. [1 ]
Critchfield, Gregory C. [1 ]
Boniface, J. Jay [1 ]
Kearney, Paul E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Sera Prognost Inc, Salt Lake City, UT 84109 USA
[2] Univ Texas Med Branch, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Galveston, TX 77555 USA
[3] Univ N Carolina, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[4] Boston Univ, Sch Med, Maternal Fetal Med, Boston, MA 02118 USA
[5] Ohio State Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[6] Valleywise Hlth, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Phoenix, AZ 85008 USA
[7] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Portland, OR 97239 USA
[8] Christiana Care Hlth Syst, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Newark, DE 19718 USA
关键词
gestational age; gestational age dating; preterm birth; spontaneous preterm birth; proteomic biomarker risk predictor; LAST MENSTRUAL PERIOD; ULTRASOUND; PREGNANCY; VALIDATION; RISK; DATE;
D O I
10.3390/jcm11102885
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The clinical management of pregnancy and spontaneous preterm birth (sPTB) relies on estimates of gestational age (GA). Our objective was to evaluate the effect of GA dating uncertainty on the observed performance of a validated proteomic biomarker risk predictor, and then to test the generalizability of that effect in a broader range of GA at blood draw. In a secondary analysis of a prospective clinical trial (PAPR; NCT01371019), we compared two GA dating categories: both ultrasound and dating by last menstrual period (LMP) (all subjects) and excluding dating by LMP (excluding LMP). The risk predictor's performance was observed at the validated risk predictor threshold both in weeks 19(1/7)-20(6/7) and extended to weeks 18(0/7)-20(6/7). Strict blinding and independent statistical analyses were employed. The validated biomarker risk predictor showed greater observed sensitivity of 88% at 75% specificity (increases of 17% and 1%) in more reliably dated (excluding-LMP) subjects, relative to all subjects. Excluding dating by LMP significantly improved the sensitivity in weeks 19(1/7)-20(6/7). In the broader blood draw window, the previously validated risk predictor threshold significantly stratified higher and lower risk of sPTB, and the risk predictor again showed significantly greater observed sensitivity in excluding-LMP subjects. These findings have implications for testing the performance of models aimed at predicting PTB.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Knowledge mapping for prediction of spontaneous preterm birth
    Shen, Hui
    Zhang, Lihe
    Bai, Han
    Wu, Lihong
    Du, Liu
    Xie, Hongning
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2025, 309 : 79 - 88
  • [32] The Preterm Prediction Study: Recurrence risk of spontaneous preterm birth
    Pun, TC
    Lee, CP
    Lao, TT
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1998, 178 (05) : 1104 - 1105
  • [33] Metabolomic Biomarkers in the Prediction of Spontaneous PreTerm Birth
    Thomas, Melinda M.
    Sulek, Karolina
    Villas-Boas, Silas G.
    Considine, Liz
    Kenny, Louise C.
    Baker, Philip N.
    REPRODUCTIVE SCIENCES, 2015, 22 : 156A - 156A
  • [34] Socioeconomic disparities in small-for-gestational-age birth and preterm birth
    Bushnik, Tracey
    Yang, Seungmi
    Kaufman, Jay S.
    Kramer, Michael S.
    Wilkins, Russell
    HEALTH REPORTS, 2017, 28 (11) : 3 - 10
  • [35] Risk factors associated with preterm birth according to gestational age at birth
    Ofori, Benjamin D.
    Le Tiec, Magali
    Berard, Anick
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2008, 17 (06) : 556 - 564
  • [36] Gestational age at birth and school performance
    Ahmed, Asma
    Yang, Seungmi
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2023, 380
  • [37] The Estimation of Gestational Age at Birth in Database Studies
    Eberg, Maria
    Platt, Robert W.
    Filion, Kristian B.
    EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2017, 28 (06) : 854 - 862
  • [38] The effect of gestational age and cervical length measurements in the prediction of spontaneous preterm birth in twin pregnancies: an individual patient level meta-analysis
    Kindinger, L. M.
    Poon, L. C.
    Cacciatore, S.
    MacIntyre, D. A.
    Fox, N. S.
    Schuit, E.
    Mol, B. W.
    Liem, S.
    Lim, A. C.
    Serra, V.
    Perales, A.
    Hermans, F.
    Darzi, A.
    Bennett, P.
    Nicolaides, K. H.
    Teoh, T. G.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2016, 123 (06) : 877 - 884
  • [39] The Preterm Prediction Study: Quantitative fetal fibronectin values and the prediction of spontaneous preterm birth
    Goepfert, AR
    Goldenberg, RL
    Mercer, B
    Iams, J
    Meis, P
    Moawad, A
    Thom, E
    VanDorsten, JP
    Caritis, SN
    Thurnau, G
    Miodovnik, M
    Dombrowski, M
    Roberts, JM
    McNellis, D
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2000, 183 (06) : 1480 - 1483
  • [40] Infection in the prediction and antibiotics in the prevention of spontaneous preterm labour and preterm birth
    Lamont, RF
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2003, 110 : 71 - 75