共 50 条
Better Estimation of Spontaneous Preterm Birth Prediction Performance through Improved Gestational Age Dating
被引:5
|作者:
Burchard, Julja
[1
]
Saade, George R.
[2
]
Boggess, Kim A.
[3
]
Markenson, Glenn R.
[4
]
Iams, Jay D.
[5
]
Coonrod, Dean V.
[6
]
Pereira, Leonardo M.
[7
]
Hoffman, Matthew K.
[8
]
Polpitiya, Ashoka D.
[1
]
Treacy, Ryan
[1
]
Fox, Angela C.
[1
]
Randolph, Todd L.
[1
]
Fleischer, Tracey C.
[1
]
Dufford, Max T.
[1
]
Garite, Thomas J.
[1
]
Critchfield, Gregory C.
[1
]
Boniface, J. Jay
[1
]
Kearney, Paul E.
[1
]
机构:
[1] Sera Prognost Inc, Salt Lake City, UT 84109 USA
[2] Univ Texas Med Branch, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Galveston, TX 77555 USA
[3] Univ N Carolina, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[4] Boston Univ, Sch Med, Maternal Fetal Med, Boston, MA 02118 USA
[5] Ohio State Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[6] Valleywise Hlth, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Phoenix, AZ 85008 USA
[7] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Portland, OR 97239 USA
[8] Christiana Care Hlth Syst, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Newark, DE 19718 USA
关键词:
gestational age;
gestational age dating;
preterm birth;
spontaneous preterm birth;
proteomic biomarker risk predictor;
LAST MENSTRUAL PERIOD;
ULTRASOUND;
PREGNANCY;
VALIDATION;
RISK;
DATE;
D O I:
10.3390/jcm11102885
中图分类号:
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号:
1002 ;
100201 ;
摘要:
The clinical management of pregnancy and spontaneous preterm birth (sPTB) relies on estimates of gestational age (GA). Our objective was to evaluate the effect of GA dating uncertainty on the observed performance of a validated proteomic biomarker risk predictor, and then to test the generalizability of that effect in a broader range of GA at blood draw. In a secondary analysis of a prospective clinical trial (PAPR; NCT01371019), we compared two GA dating categories: both ultrasound and dating by last menstrual period (LMP) (all subjects) and excluding dating by LMP (excluding LMP). The risk predictor's performance was observed at the validated risk predictor threshold both in weeks 19(1/7)-20(6/7) and extended to weeks 18(0/7)-20(6/7). Strict blinding and independent statistical analyses were employed. The validated biomarker risk predictor showed greater observed sensitivity of 88% at 75% specificity (increases of 17% and 1%) in more reliably dated (excluding-LMP) subjects, relative to all subjects. Excluding dating by LMP significantly improved the sensitivity in weeks 19(1/7)-20(6/7). In the broader blood draw window, the previously validated risk predictor threshold significantly stratified higher and lower risk of sPTB, and the risk predictor again showed significantly greater observed sensitivity in excluding-LMP subjects. These findings have implications for testing the performance of models aimed at predicting PTB.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文