Planned nerve preservation to reduce positive surgical margins during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

被引:31
|
作者
Zorn, Kevin C. [1 ]
Gofrit, Ofer N. [1 ]
Steinberg, Gary P. [1 ]
Taxy, Jerome B. [1 ]
Zagaja, Gregory P. [1 ]
Shalhav, Arieh L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chicago, Urol Sect, Pritzker Sch Med, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1089/end.2008.0009
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: The main objective of radical prostatectomy (RP) is optimal oncologic resection with preservation of sexual function (SF). During our initial experience with robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RLRP), we noted a high rate of posterolateral location of positive surgical margins (PSM) with nerve preservation (NP). With its magnified view of the surgical field and improved instrument precision, one potential advantage of RLRP is the ability to tailor the degree of NP. We evaluated the effect of a protocol for side-specific NP based on preoperative variables on PSM rates and SF outcomes. Methods: Between June and November 2006, 150 consecutive RLRPs were performed using a surgical protocol to select side-specific NP techniques (interfascial [IF], partial extrafascial [pEF], and wide extrafascial resection [WEFR]) based on preoperative risk factors (clinical stage, biopsy Gleason score, percentage of positive cores and maximal core cancer percentage, and preoperative PSA). Pathologic and SF outcomes in these patients were compared with those of a control group of 245 consecutive RLRPs in whom non-selective IF dissection was performed. All data were prospectively collected. Results: Mean patient age, PSA, clinical stage, biopsy Gleason score and positive core involvement, pathologic Gleason score, and stage were comparable among the two groups. The overall PSM rate (12.6% v 20.4%; P = 0.04) and posterolateral location of PSMs (37% v 70%; P = 0.04) were significantly lower in the study group. At 12 months, potency was reported in 80%, 67%, and 11% of men undergoing bilateral IFNP, partial extrafascial nerve preservation (pEFNP), and WEFR, respectively (P = 0.27). Conclusions: Planning side-specific NP during RLRP, according to selected preoperative variables, can significantly reduce overall and posterolateral PSM rates. Furthermore, partial nerve sparing (pEFNP) also appears to confer favorable early SF outcomes.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:1303 / 1309
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] POSITIVE SURGICAL MARGIN RATES IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING BILATERAL INTRAFACIAL NERVE SPARING ROBOT-ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Labanaris, Apostolos P.
    Wagner, Christian
    Witt, Jorn H.
    Zugor, Vahudin
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2012, 26 : A224 - A224
  • [32] Reality of nerve sparing and surgical margins in surgeons' early experience with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in Japan
    Tatsugami, Katsunori
    Yoshioka, Kunihiko
    Shiroki, Ryoichi
    Eto, Masatoshi
    Yoshino, Yasushi
    Tozawa, Keiichi
    Fukasawa, Satoshi
    Fujisawa, Masato
    Takenaka, Atsushi
    Nasu, Yasutomo
    Kashiwagi, Akira
    Gotoh, Momokazu
    Terachi, Toshiro
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 24 (03) : 191 - 196
  • [33] High-risk prostate cancer surgical margins during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Duperron, C.
    Moulin, M.
    Koutlidis, N.
    Mourey, E.
    Cormier, L.
    PROGRES EN UROLOGIE, 2015, 25 (07): : 390 - 395
  • [34] The impact of 3D models on positive surgical margins after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Checcucci, Enrico
    Pecoraro, Angela
    Amparore, Daniele
    De Cillis, Sabrina
    Granato, Stefano
    Volpi, Gabriele
    Sica, Michele
    Verri, Paolo
    Piana, Alberto
    Piazzolla, Pietro
    Manfredi, Matteo
    Vezzetti, Enrico
    Di Dio, Michele
    Fiori, Cristian
    Porpiglia, Francesco
    Urology, Uro-technology And Some Working Group Of The Young Academic Urologists Working Party Of The European Association Of
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 40 (09) : 2221 - 2229
  • [35] The impact of 3D models on positive surgical margins after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Enrico Checcucci
    Angela Pecoraro
    Daniele Amparore
    Sabrina De Cillis
    Stefano Granato
    Gabriele Volpi
    Michele Sica
    Paolo Verri
    Alberto Piana
    Pietro Piazzolla
    Matteo Manfredi
    Enrico Vezzetti
    Michele Di Dio
    Cristian Fiori
    Francesco Porpiglia
    World Journal of Urology, 2022, 40 : 2221 - 2229
  • [36] Identification and preservation of accessory pudendal vessels during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical retropubic prostatectomy
    Sterrett S.P.
    Laurila T.
    Bandi G.
    Jarrard D.F.
    Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2008, 2 (1) : 31 - 34
  • [37] Robot-assisted or pure laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: What is the optimal procedure for the surgical margins? A single center experience
    Koutlidis, Nicolas
    Mourey, Eric
    Champigneulle, Jacqueline
    Mangin, Philippe
    Cormier, Luc
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 19 (12) : 1076 - 1081
  • [38] INVERSE CORRELATION BETWEEN PROSTATE SIZE AND POSITIVE SURGICAL MARGINS IN ROBOT ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPIC PROSTATECTOMY AND RADICAL RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY
    Thumar, Adeep
    Chandrasekar, Thenappan
    Lee, Franklin
    Lappe, Stefanie
    McCue, Peter
    Lallas, Costas
    Gomella, Leonard
    Trabulsi, Edouard
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 183 (04): : E756 - E756
  • [39] EARLY RETROGRADE NERVE PRESERVATION DURING ROBOT-ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY IMPROVES POTENCY OUTCOMES
    Sivaraman, A.
    Orvieto, M. A.
    Coelho, R. F.
    Chauhan, S.
    Marchetti, P. E.
    Ardilla, B.
    Palmer, K.
    Patel, V.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2010, 24 : A348 - A348
  • [40] PREDICTORS OF POSITIVE SURGICAL MARGINS IN ROBOT-ASSITED LAPAROSCOPIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Albala, David
    Tsivian, Matvay
    Yong, Daniel
    Zilberman, Dorit
    Ferrandino, Michael
    Mouraviev, Vladimir
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2011, 25 : A64 - A64