Antisocial punishment in two social dilemmas

被引:8
|
作者
Fatas, Enrique [1 ]
Mateu, Guillermo [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ E Anglia, Sch Econ, Norwich NR4 7TJ, Norfolk, England
[2] Burgundy Sch Business, Finance Control & Law Dept, Lab Social Sci & Behav Anal, Dijon, France
来源
关键词
anti social behavior; punishment; public goods; coordination; experiments JEL classification numbers: C92; EQUILIBRIUM SELECTION; ALTRUISTIC PUNISHMENT; COORDINATION FAILURE; COOPERATION; RECIPROCITY; ENFORCEMENT; COMPETITION; PROVISION; EVOLUTION; CULTURE;
D O I
10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00107
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The effect of sanctions on cooperation depends on social and cultural norms. While free riding is kept at bay by altruistic punishment in certain cultures, antisocial punishment carried out by free riders pushes back cooperation in others. In this paper we analyze sanctions in both a standard public goods game with a linear production function and an otherwise identical social dilemma in which the minimum contribution determines the group outcome. Experiments were run in a culture with traditionally high antisocial punishment (Southern Europe). We replicate the detrimental effect of antisocial sanctions on cooperation in the linear case. However, we find that punishment is still widely effective when actions are complementary: the provision of the public good significantly and substantially increases with sanctions, participants punish significantly less and sanctions radically transform conditional cooperation patterns to generate significant welfare gains.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条