Recruitment of Scc2/4 to double-strand breaks depends on γH2A and DNA end resection

被引:9
|
作者
Scherzer, Martin [1 ]
Giordano, Fosco [1 ]
Ferran, Maria Sole [1 ]
Strom, Lena [1 ]
机构
[1] Karolinska Inst, Dept Cell & Mol Biol, Stockholm, Sweden
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
SISTER-CHROMATID COHESION; REPLICATION PROTEIN-A; HOMOLOGOUS RECOMBINATION; HISTONE H2A; GENE-EXPRESSION; INO80; COMPLEX; DAMAGE; PHOSPHORYLATION; REPAIR; BINDING;
D O I
10.26508/lsa.202101244
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Homologous recombination enables cells to overcome the threat of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), allowing for repair without the loss of genetic information. Central to the homologous recombination repair process is the de novo loading of cohesin around a DSB by its loader complex Scc2/4. Although cohesin's DSB accumulation has been explored in numerous studies, the prerequisites for Scc2/4 recruitment during the repair process are still elusive. To address this question, we combine chromatin immunoprecipitation-qPCR with a site-specific DSB in vivo, in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We find that Scc2 DSB recruitment relies on gamma H2A and Tel1, but as opposed to cohesin, not on Mec1. We further show that the binding of Scc2, which emanates from the break site, depends on and coincides with DNA end resection. Absence of chromatin remodeling at the DSB affects Scc2 binding and DNA end resection to a comparable degree, further indicating the latter to be a major driver for Scc2 recruitment. Our results shed light on the intricate DSB repair cascade leading to the recruitment of Scc2/4 and subsequent loading of cohesin.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 14
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Human HELQ regulates DNA end resection at DNA double-strand breaks and stalled replication forks
    Zhao, Yuqin
    Hou, Kaiping
    Li, Youhang
    Hao, Shuailin
    Liu, Yu
    Na, Yinan
    Li, Chao
    Cui, Jian
    Xu, Xingzhi
    Wu, Xiaohua
    Wang, Hailong
    NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2023, 51 (22) : 12207 - 12223
  • [22] End resection and telomere healing of DNA double-strand breaks during nematode programmed DNA elimination
    Estrem, Brandon
    Davis, Richard E.
    Wang, Jianbin
    NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2024, 52 (15) : 8913 - 8929
  • [23] Postreplicative recruitment of cohesin to double-strand breaks is required for DNA repair
    Ström, L
    Lindroos, HB
    Shirahige, K
    Sjögren, C
    MOLECULAR CELL, 2004, 16 (06) : 1003 - 1015
  • [24] DNA double-strand breaks with 5′ adducts are efficiently channeled to the DNA2-mediated resection pathway
    Tammaro, Margaret
    Liao, Shuren
    Beeharry, Neil
    Yan, Hong
    NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2016, 44 (01) : 221 - 231
  • [25] Antibody to γ-H2A-S(4C)Q detects DNA double-strand breaks
    Rogakou, EP
    Redon, C
    Pilch, DR
    Sedelnikova, O
    Bonner, WM
    RADIATION RESEARCH, 2001, 156 (04) : 442 - 442
  • [26] EXOSC10 is required for RPA assembly and controlled DNA end resection at DNA double-strand breaks
    Domingo-Prim, Judit
    Endara-Coll, Martin
    Bonath, Franziska
    Jimeno, Sonia
    Prados-Carvaja, Rosario
    Friedlander, Marc R.
    Huertas, Pablo
    Visa, Neus
    NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2019, 10 (1)
  • [27] EXOSC10 is required for RPA assembly and controlled DNA end resection at DNA double-strand breaks
    Judit Domingo-Prim
    Martin Endara-Coll
    Franziska Bonath
    Sonia Jimeno
    Rosario Prados-Carvajal
    Marc R. Friedländer
    Pablo Huertas
    Neus Visa
    Nature Communications, 10
  • [28] REPAIR OF DNA DOUBLE-STRAND BREAKS REQUIRES 2 HOMOLOGOUS DNA DUPLEXES
    LUCHNIK, AN
    GLASER, VM
    SHESTAKOV, SV
    MOLECULAR BIOLOGY REPORTS, 1977, 3 (06) : 437 - 442
  • [29] Nonhomologous DNA end-joining for repair of DNA double-strand breaks
    Pannunzio, Nicholas R.
    Watanabe, Go
    Lieber, Michael R.
    JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY, 2018, 293 (27) : 10512 - 10523
  • [30] E2F1 promotes the recruitment of DNA repair factors to sites of DNA double-strand breaks
    Chen, Jie
    Zhu, Feng
    Weaks, Regina L.
    Biswas, Anup K.
    Guo, Ruifeng
    Li, Yanjie
    Johnson, David G.
    CELL CYCLE, 2011, 10 (08) : 1287 - 1294