Putting children forward for epilepsy surgery: A qualitative study of UK parents' and health professionals' decision-making experiences

被引:20
|
作者
Heath, Gemma [1 ,2 ]
Abdin, Shanara [1 ]
Begum, Rahima [1 ]
Kearney, Shauna [2 ]
机构
[1] Aston Univ, Dept Psychol, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[2] Birmingham Childrens Hosp, Dept Psychol, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
关键词
Qualitative research; Epilepsy; Decision-making; Parents; Healthcare professionals; TEAM;
D O I
10.1016/j.yebeh.2016.05.037
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Background: Against a backdrop of recommendations for increasing access to and uptake of early surgical intervention for children with medically intractable epilepsy, it is important to understand how parents and professionals decide to put children forward for epilepsy surgery and what their decisional support needs are. Aim: The aim of this study was to explore how parents and health professionals make decisions regarding putting children forward for pediatric epilepsy surgery. Methods: Individual interviews were conducted with nine parents of children who had undergone pediatric epilepsy surgery at a specialist children's hospital and ten healthcare professionals who made up the children's epilepsy surgery service multidisciplinary healthcare team (MDT). Three MDT meetings were also observed. Data were analyzed thematically. Findings: Four themes were generated from analysis of interviews with parents: presentation of surgery as a treatment option, decision-making, looking back, and interventions. Three themes were generated from analysis of interviews/observations with health professionals: triangulating information, team working, and patient and family perspectives. Discussion: Parents wanted more information and support in deciding to put their child forward for epilepsy surgery. They attempted to balance the potential benefits of surgery against any risks of harm. For health professionals, a multidisciplinary approach was seen as crucial to the decision-making process. Advocating for the family was perceived to be the responsibility of nonmedical professionals. Conclusion: Decision-making can be supported by incorporating families into discussions regarding epilepsy surgery as a potential treatment option earlier in the process and by providing families with additional information and access to other parents with similar experiences. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:185 / 191
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Recruiting parents and children into a research project: a qualitative exploration of families' decision-making processes
    Lewis, Ruth
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2009, 12 (05) : 405 - 419
  • [42] Decision-making by Adolescents and Parents of Children With Cancer Regarding Health Research Participation
    Read, Kate
    Fernandez, Conrad Vincent
    Gao, Jun
    Strahlendorf, Caron
    Moghrabi, Albert
    Pentz, Rebecca Davis
    Barfield, Raymond Carlton
    Baker, Justin Nathaniel
    Santor, Darcy
    Weijer, Charles
    Kodish, Eric
    [J]. PEDIATRICS, 2009, 124 (03) : 959 - 965
  • [43] Ethical Decision-making of Health Professionals Caring for People Living with HIV/AIDS in Hunan, China: A Qualitative Study
    Lu, Xiaoxiao
    Huang, Hangyu
    Khoshnood, Kaveh
    Koniak-Griffin, Deborah
    Wang, Honghong
    Yang, Min
    [J]. INQUIRY-THE JOURNAL OF HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION PROVISION AND FINANCING, 2022, 59
  • [44] Chinese mental health professionals' perceptions of shared decision-making regarding people diagnosed with schizophrenia: A qualitative study
    Huang, Chongmei
    Lam, Louisa
    Zhong, Yaping
    Plummer, Virginia
    Cross, Wendy
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH NURSING, 2021, 30 (01) : 189 - 199
  • [45] Investigating factors influencing decision-making around use of breastmilk substitutes by health care professionals: a qualitative study
    Islam, Maisha
    Assani, Dourra
    Ramlawi, Serine
    Murphy, Malia S. Q.
    Alibhai, Kameela Miriam
    White, Ruth Rennicks
    Dingwall-Harvey, Alysha L. J.
    Dunn, Sandra, I
    El-Chaar, Darine
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL BREASTFEEDING JOURNAL, 2024, 19 (01):
  • [46] Experiences with the end-of-life decision-making process in children with cancer, their parents, and healthcare professionals: A systematic review and meta-ethnography
    Hirata, Mika
    Kobayashi, Kyoko
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC NURSING-NURSING CARE OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES, 2023, 69 : e45 - e64
  • [47] DECISION-MAKING FOR CHILDREN FOLLOWING A CANCER DIAGNOSIS- PRELIMINARY FINDINGS FROM A QUALITATIVE STUDY WITH PARENTS AND ONCOLOGISTS
    Badarau, D.
    Colita, A.
    Dragomir, M.
    Elger, B.
    Kuehne, T.
    Miron, I.
    Niggli, F.
    Ruhe, K.
    Wangmo, T.
    [J]. PEDIATRIC BLOOD & CANCER, 2014, 61 : S366 - S366
  • [48] Understanding the Influences Behind Parents’ Asthma Decision-Making: A Qualitative Exploration of the Asthma Network of Parents with Children with Asthma
    Pamela Srour-Alphonse
    Biljana Cvetkovski
    Elizabeth Azzi
    Cynthia Rand
    Lynn H. M. Cheong
    Vicky Kritikos
    Sinthia Bosnic-Anticevich
    [J]. Pulmonary Therapy, 2021, 7 : 151 - 170
  • [49] Clinician Experiences in Treatment Decision-Making for Patients with Spinal Metastases A Qualitative Study
    Barton, Lauren B.
    Arant, Kaetlyn R.
    Blucher, Justin A.
    Sarno, Danielle L.
    Redmond, Kristin J.
    Balboni, Tracy A.
    Colman, Matthew
    Goodwin, C. Rory
    Laufer, Ilya
    Placide, Rick
    Shin, John H.
    Sciubba, Daniel M.
    Losina, Elena
    Katz, Jeffrey N.
    Schoenfeld, Andrew J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2021, 103 (01): : E1
  • [50] Experiences of prenatal diagnosis and decision-making about termination of pregnancy: A qualitative study
    Hodgson, Jan
    Pitt, Penelope
    Metcalfe, Sylvia
    Halliday, Jane
    Menezes, Melody
    Fisher, Jane
    Hickerton, Chriselle
    Petersen, Kerry
    McClaren, Belinda
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2016, 56 (06): : 605 - 613